Beyond Habermas, with Habermas: Adjudicating Ethical Issues in Sport through a Discourse Ethics-based Normative Theory of Sport

References

• Apel, K.-O. 1980. Towards a transformation of philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Apel, K.-O. 2001. The response of discourse ethics: To the moral challenge of the human situation as such and especially today : (Mercier lectures, Louvain-la-Neuve, March 1999). Leuven: Peeters.
   Google Scholar
• Baynes, K. 2016. Habermas. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cloete, M. 2000. Is Habermas a transcendental thinker? South African Journal of Philosophy 19 (2): 95–117. doi:10.4314/sajpem.v19i2.31310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conill, J. 2017. The hermeneutical and deliberative nature of applied ethics. In Public reason and applied ethics: the ways of practical reason in a pluralist society, edited by A. Cortina and D. García-Marzá. New York, NY: Routledge: 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, A. 2017. The public task of applied ethics: transnational civic ethics. In Public reason and applied ethics: the ways of practical reason in a pluralist society, edited by A. Cortina and D. García-Marzá. New York, NY: Routledge: 9–32.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. 2008. Guide to the world anti-doping code: The fight for the spirit of sport. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar, A. 2006. Habermas: The key concepts. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar, A. 2007. Sport as strategic action: A Habermasian perspective. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1): 33–46. doi:10.1080/17511320601142977
   Google Scholar
• Fultner, B. and I. Ebrary. 2011. Jurgen Habermas: Key Concepts. Durham; Montreal: Acumen Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• García-Marzá, D. 2017. Responsibility for praxis: Discourse ethics as applied ethics. In Public reason and applied ethics: The ways of practical reason in a pluralist society, edited by A. Cortina and D. García-Marzá. New York, NY: Routledge: 113–33.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1991. On the logic of the social sciences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1995a. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1995b. Postmetaphysical thinking: Philosophical essays. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1999. The structural transformation of the public sphere. An inquiry into the category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2001. Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics. C. Cronin, Trans. Cambridge, Mass: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2001. The hermeneutical claim to universality. In Contemporary hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as method, philosophy, and critique, edited by J. Bleicher. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul: 181–211.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2003). Truth and justification. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2017. Postmetaphysical thinking II: Essays and replies. (C. Cronin, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2018. Philosophical introductions: Five approaches to communicative reason. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, D. 2011. Human nature and autonomy. Jurgen Habermas’ critique of liberal eugenics. Ethical Perspectives 18 (2): 249–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hortal, A. 2017. Applied ethics and moral knowledge. In Public reason and applied ethics: The ways of practical reason in a pluralist society, edited by A. Cortina and D. García-Marzá. New York, NY: Routledge: 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Howman, D. 2015. The path to a fairer, stronger, Code. Available at: https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/wada_pt_issue_02_14_en_final_web.pdf [accessed 4 May 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. 1991. Habermas on Strategic and Communicative Action. Political Theory 19 (2): 181–201. doi:10.1177/0090591791019002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettner, M. 2006. Discourse ethics. Apel, Habermas, and beyond. In Bioethics in cultural contexts, edited by C. Rehmann-Sutter, M. Düwell, and D. Mieth. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands: 299–318. doi:10.1080/17511320701676866
   Google Scholar
• Khan, G. 2012. Politics and morality in Habermas’ discourse ethics. Philosophy & Social Criticism 38 (2): 149–68. doi:10.1177/0191453711427254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretchmar, R.S. 2007. Dualisms, dichotomies and dead ends: Limitations of analytic thinking about sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (3): 266–80. doi:10.1080/17511320701676866
   Google Scholar
• Kretchmar, R.S. 2018. Formalism and Sport. In Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Sport, edited by W.J. Morgan and M.J. McNamee. New York: Routledge: 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, Ø. 2009. Right to dissent: The critical principle in discourse ethics and deliberative democracy. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Loland, S. 2018. Morgan, the ‘Gratuitous’ logic of sport, and the art of self-imposed constraints. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy: 1–13. doi:10.1080/17511321.2018.1493530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loland, S. and M. McNamee. 2019. The ‘spirit of sport,’ WADAs code review, and the search for an overlapping consensus. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics: 1–13. doi:10.1080/19406940.2019.1581646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez Frias, F.J. 2014. William J. Morgan’s ‘conventionalist internalism’ approach. Furthering internalism? A critical hermeneutical response. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 8 (2): 157–71. doi:10.1080/17511321.2014.932430
   Google Scholar
• Lopez Frias, F.J. 2018. A critique of mutualism’s combination of the Aristotelian and Kantian traditions. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 45 (2): 161–76. doi:10.1080/00948705.2018.1479854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez Frias, F.J. 2018b. The use of performance-enhancing technologies in sports through Nicholas Agar’s “truly human enhancement” approach. Performance Enhancement and Health. doi:10.1016/j.peh.2018.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Macedo,E. 2018. WADA and imperialism? A philosophical look into anti-doping and athletes as coloniser and colonised, International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(3): 415–427, doi:10.1080/19406940.2017.1383930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendieta, E. 1996. Introduction. In Karl Otto Apel: Selected essays. Volume two: Ethics and the theory of rationality, edited by K.O. Apel. New Jersey: Humanities Press: xi–xxiii.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, W. J. 1994. Leftist theories of sport: A critique and reconstruction. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, W.J. 2006. Why sports morally matter. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, W.J. 2012. Broad internalism, deep conventions, moral entrepreneurs, and sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1): 65–100. doi:10.1080/00948705.2012.675069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, W.J. 2015. Sport, Habermas, and the moral sphere: A response to Lopez Frias. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 9 (3): 287–302. doi:10.1080/17511321.2015.1094821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, W.J. 2016. The normativity of sport: A historicist take on broad internalism. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (1): 27–39. doi:10.1080/00948705.2015.1112240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, W.J. 2018. Conventionalism and sport. In Routledge handbook of the philosophy of sport,edited by M. McNamee and W.J. Morgan. New York, NY: Routledge: 35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, T.H. and J. Habermas. 1990. Jürgen Habermas: Morality, society and ethics: An interview with Torben Hviid Nielsen. Acta Sociologica 33(2): 93–114. doi:10.1177/000169939003300201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, J. 2018. Doping, “mechanical doping,” and local essentialism in the individuation of sports. In Ethics in sport, edited by W.J. In Morgan. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics: 321–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, I. 2014. Pierre de Coubertin, Doped ‘Amateurs’ and the ‘Spirit of Sport’: The role of mythology in olympic anti-doping policies The International Journal of The History of Sport 31 (8): 820–838. doi:10.1080/09523367.2014.883500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J.S. 1999. Are rules all an umpire has to work with? Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 26 (1): 27–49. doi:10.1080/00948705.1999.9714577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, R.L. 2004. From ethnocentrism to realism: Can discourse ethics bridge the gap? Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 31 (2): 122–41. doi:10.1080/00948705.2004.9714656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, R.L., C.R. Torres, and P.F. Hager. 2015. Fair play. The ethics of sport. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
   Google Scholar
• Siurana, J.C. 2012. La sociedad ética: Indicadores para evaluar eticamente una sociedad. Cànoves i Samalús: Editorial Proteus.
   Google Scholar
• “The New ADAMS: Update”. 2015. Available at: https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/2015-03/the-new-adams-update (accessed 25 June 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J.B. 1981. Critical Hermeneutics: A study in the thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timmons, M. 2017. Decision procedures, moral criteria, and the problem of relevant descriptions in Kant’s ethics. In Significance and system: Essays on Kant’s ethics, M. Timmons. London: Oxford University Press: 50–81.
   Google Scholar
• WADA. 2015. World anti-doping code. Available at: https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/wada-2015-world-anti-doping-code.pdf (accessed 28 June 2019).
   Google Scholar
• WADA. 2014. Athlete committee terms of reference [online]. Availableat: https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/wada-athlete-committee-terms-of-reference-2014.pdf (accessed 28 June).
   Google Scholar
• Warnke, G. 1993. Justice and interpretation. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar