1,357
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Normalizing Online Comments

&

REFERENCES

  • Barnard, Stephen R. 2014. “‘Tweet or Be Sacked’: Twitter and the New Elements of Journalistic Practice.” Journalism 17 (2): 190–207. doi: 10.1177/1464884914553079
  • Bergström, Annika, and Ingela Wadbring. 2015. “Beneficial Yet Crappy: Journalists and Audiences on Obstacles and Opportunities in Reader Comments.” European Journal of Communication 30 (2): 137–151. doi: 10.1177/0267323114559378
  • Boczkowski, Pablo. 2005. Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bogdan, Robert C., and Sari K. Biklen. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Brechin, Ann, and Sidell, Moyra. 2000. “Ways of Knowing.” In Using Evidence in Health and Social Care, edited by Roger Gomm and Celia Davies, 3–23. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Brost, Lori. 2013. “Editors Have Mixed Feelings on User-Generated Comments.” Newspaper Research Journal 34 (3): 101–115. doi: 10.1177/073953291303400308
  • Canter, Lily. 2013. “The Misconception of Online Comment Threads: Content and Control on Local Newspaper Websites.” Journalism Practice 7 (5): 604–619. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2012.740172
  • Cassell, Joan. 1977. “The Relationship Observer to Observed in Peer Group Research.” Human Organization 36: 412–416. doi: 10.17730/humo.36.4.b3h110730h2240jn
  • Chen, Gina Masullo, and Shuning Lu. forthcoming. “Online Political Discourse: Exploring Differences in Effects of Civil and Uncivil Disagreement in News Website Comments.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.
  • Chess, Shira, and Adrienne Shaw. 2015. “A Conspiracy of Fishes, or, How We Learned to Stop Worrying About #GamerGate and Embrace Hegemonic Masculinity.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 59 (1): 208–220. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2014.999917
  • Coe, Kevin, Kate Kenski, and Stephen A. Rains. 2014. “Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments.” Journal of Communication 64: 658–679. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12104
  • Cole, Kirsti K. 2015. “‘It’s Like She’s Eager to be Verbally Abused’: Twitter, Trolls, and (En)Gendering Disciplinary Rhetoric.” Feminist Media Studies 15 (2): 356–358. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2015.1008750
  • Diakopoulos, Nicholas, and Mor Naaman. 2011. “Towards Quality Discourse in Online News Comments.” Proceedings of the CSCW. Hangzhou, China. March 19-23.
  • Cresswell, JohnW. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Research Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Gastil, John. 2008. Political Communication and Deliberation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hatcher, John A., and Mary Currin-Percival. 2016. “Does the Structural Pluralism Model Predict Differences in Journalists’ Perceptions of Online Comments?” Digital Journalism 4 (3): 302–320. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2015.1049636
  • Hermida, Alfred. 2011. “Fluid Spaces, Fluid Journalism: Lessons in Participatory Journalism.” In Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, edited by Jane B. Singer, David Domingo, Ari Heinonen, Alfred Hermida, Steve Paulussen, Thorsten Quandt, Zvi Reich, and Marina Vujnovic, 177–191. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Hughey, Matthew W., and Jessie Daniels. 2013. “Racist Comments at Online News Sites: A Methodological Dilemma for Discourse Analysis.” Media, Culture & Society 35 (3): 332–347. doi: 10.1177/0163443712472089
  • Jacobs, Lawrence R., Fay Lomax Cook, and Michael X. Delli Carpini. 2009. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ksiazek, Thomas B. 2015. “Civil Interactivity: How News Organizations’ Commenting Policies Explain Civility and Hostility in User Comments.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 59 (4): 556–573. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2015.1093487
  • Kvale, Steinar, and Svend Brinkman. 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lasorsa, Dominic L., Seth C. Lewis, and Avery E. Holton. 2012. “Normalizing Twitter: Journalism Practice in the Emerging Communication Space.” Journalism Studies 13 (1): 19–36. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825
  • Lewis, Seth C., Avery E. Holton, and Mark Coddington. 2014. “Reciprocal Journalism.” Journalism Practice 8 (2): 229–241. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2013.859840
  • Loke, Jaime. 2012. “Old Turf, New Neighbors.” Journalism Practice 6 (2): 233–249. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2011.616649
  • Mabweazara, Hayes M. 2014. “Reader Comments on Zimbabwean Newspaper Websites.” Digital Journalism 2 (1): 44–61. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2013.850200
  • Manosevitch, Edith, and Dana Walker. 2009. “Reader Comments to Online Opinion Journalism: A Space of Public Deliberation.” International Symposium of Online Journalism 10: 10–30.
  • McCracken, Grant D. 1988. The Long Interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Meltzer, Kimberly. 2015. “Journalistic Concern About Uncivil Political Talk in Digital News Media: Responsibility, Credibility, and Academic Influence.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 20 (1): 85–107. doi: 10.1177/1940161214558748
  • Meyer, Hans K., and Michael C. Carey. 2014. “In Moderation: Examining How Journalists’ Attitudes Toward Online Comments Affect the Creation of Community.” Journalism Practice 8 (2): 213–228. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2013.859838
  • Nielsen, Carolyn. (2012). Newspaper journalists support online comments. Newspaper Research Journal 33 (1), 86–100. doi: 10.1177/073953291203300107
  • Papacharissi, Zizi. 2004. “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society 6 (2): 259–283. doi: 10.1177/1461444804041444
  • Reader, Bill. 2012. “Free Press vs. Free speech? The Rhetoric of ‘Civility’ in Regard to Anonymous Online Comments.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89 (3): 495–513. doi: 10.1177/1077699012447923
  • Reese, Stephen D. 2016. “The New Geography of Journalism Research: Levels and Spaces.” Digital Journalism. doi:10.1080/21670811.2016.11.52903.
  • Reich, Zvi. 2011. “User Comments: The Transformation of Participatory Space.” In Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, edited by Jane B. Singer, Alfred Hermida, David Domingo, Ari Heinonen, Steve Paulussen, Thorsten Quandt, Zvi Reich, and Marina Vujnovic, 96–117. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Rodino-Colocino, Michelle. 2014. “#YesAllWomen: Intersectional Mobilization Against Sexual Assault is Radical (Again).” Feminist Media Studies 14 (1): 1113–1115. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2014.975475
  • Rosenberry, Jack. 2005. “Few Papers Use Online Techniques to Improve Public Communication. Newspaper Research Journal 26 (4): 61–73.
  • Rösner, Leonie, Stephan Winter, and Nicole C. Krämer. 2016. “Dangerous Minds? Effects of Uncivil Online Comments on Aggressive Cognitions, Emotions, and Behavior.” Computers in Human Behavior 58: 4610–470. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.022
  • Ruiz, Carlos, David Domingo, Josep L. Micó, Javier Díaz-Noci, Koldo Meso, and Pere Maship. 2011. “Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers.” International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (4): 463–487. doi: 10.1177/1940161211415849
  • Santana, Arthur D. 2011. “Online Readers’ Comments Represent New Opinion Pipeline.” Newspaper Research Journal 32 (3): 66–81. doi: 10.1177/073953291103200306
  • Santana, Arthur D. 2014. “Virtuous or Vitriolic.” Journalism Practice 8 (1): 18–33. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
  • Santana, Arthur D. 2016. “Controlling the Conversation.” Journalism Studies 17 (2): 141–158. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2014.972076
  • Santana, Arthur D., and John Russial. 2013. “Photojournalists’ Role Expands at Most Daily Newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal 34 (1): 74–88. doi: 10.1177/073953291303400107
  • Shoemaker, Pamela J., and Philip R. Johnson, Hyunjin Seo, Xiuli Wang. 2010. “Readers as Gatekeepers of Online News: Brazil, China and the United States.” Brazilian Journalism Research 6 (1): 55–77.
  • Shoemaker, Pamela J., and Tim P. Vos. 2009a. Gatekeeping Theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Shoemaker, Pamela J., and Tim P. Vos. 2009b. “Media Gatekeeping.” In An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and ResearchE, edited by Don W. Stacks and Michael B. Salwen. 2nd ed. 75–87. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Singer, Jane B. 2005. “The Political J-bloggers: ‘Normalizing’ a New Medium to Fit Old Norms and Practices.” Journalism 6 (2): 173–198. doi: 10.1177/1464884905051009
  • Singer, Jane B. 2007. “Contested Autonomy.” Journalism Studies 8 (1): 79–95. doi: 10.1080/14616700601056866
  • Singer, Jane B. 2010. “Quality Control.” Journalism Studies 4 (1): 127–142.
  • Singer, Jane B., and Ashman, Ian. 2009. “‘Comment is Free, But Facts Are Sacred’: User-Generated Content and Ethical Constructs in the Guardian.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (1): 3–21. doi: 10.1080/08900520802644345
  • Stroud, Natalie J., Joshua M. Scacco, Ashley Muddiman, and Alexander L. Curry. 2015. “Changing Deliberative Norms on News Organizations’ Facebook Sites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20: 188–203. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12104
  • Sukumaran, Abhay, Stephanie Vezich, Melanie McHugh, and Clifford Nass. 2011. “Normative Influences on Thoughtful Online Participation.” Proceedings of the CHI 2011 Session: Incentives & User Generated Content, Vancouver, British Columbia, 3401–3410.
  • Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2001. “Letters to the Editor as a Forum for Public Deliberation: Modes of Publicity and Democratic Debate?” Critical Studies in Media Communication 18 (3): 303–320. doi: 10.1080/07393180128085
  • Welch, Susan. 1975. “Sampling by Referral in a Dispersed Population.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 39: 237–245. doi: 10.1086/268221

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.