Engaging the Audience in a Digitised Television Production Process

REFERENCES

• Andrejevic, Mark. 2009. “Critical Media Studies 2.0: An Interactive Upgrade.” Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture 1 (1): 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Renee. 2016. “The Ecology of Participation.” In SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism, edited by Tamara Witschge, Chris W. Anderson, David Domingo and Alfred Hermida, 179–191. Los Angeles: SAGE reference.
   Google Scholar
• Born, Georgina. 2000. “Reports and Debates. Special Debate: Inside Television: Television Studies and the Sociology of Culture.” Screen 41 (4): 404–424. doi: 10.1093/screen/41.4.404
   Google Scholar
• Brants, Kees, and Yael de Haan. 2010. “Taking the Public Seriously: Three Models of Responsiveness in Media and Journalism.” Media, Culture & Society 32 (3): 411–428. doi: 10.1177/0163443709361170
   Google Scholar
• Bro, Peter, and Filip Wallberg. 2015. “Gatekeeping in a Digital Era: Principles, Practices and Technological Platforms.” Journalism Practice 9 (1): 92–105. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2014.928468
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. 2016. Social Research Methods. Fifth ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, John T. 2008. Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Console-Ing Passions. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, John T. 2009. “Cultures of Production: Studying Industry’s Deep Texts, Reflexive Rituals, and Managed Self-Disclosures.” In Media Industries: History, Theory, and Method, edited by Jennifer Holt and Alisa Perren, 199–212. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, Muriel. 1971. The Hollywood TV Producer: His Work and His Audience. New York: Basic Books Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Carah, Nicholas, and Eric Louw. 2015. Media and Society: Production, Content and Participation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin De Cleen. 2008. “Introduction.” In Participation and Media Production: Critical Reflections on Content Creation, edited by Nico Carpentier and Benjamin De Cleen, 1–12. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, Stephen, and Karen Ross. 2010. The Media and the Public: “Them” and “us” in Media Discourse. Communication in the Public Interest. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, Peter. 2009. Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication, and Democracy. Communication, Society and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deuze, Mark. 2009. “Convergence Culture and Media Work.” In Media Industries: History, Theory, and Method, edited by Jennifer Holt and Alisa Perren, 144–156. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, José, and Thomas Poell. 2015. “Making Public Television Social? Public Service Broadcasting and the Challenges of Social Media.” Television & New Media 16 (2): 148–164. doi: 10.1177/1527476414527136
   Google Scholar
• Domingo, David. 2008. “Interactivity in the Daily Routines of Online Newsrooms: Dealing with an Uncomfortable Myth.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (3): 680–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00415.x
   Google Scholar
• Enli, Gunn Sara. 2008. “Redefining Public Service Broadcasting: Multi-Platform Participation.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14 (1): 105–120. doi: 10.1177/1354856507084422
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Elisabeth. 2016. “Negotiating 'Engagement' Within Transmedia Culture.” Paper presented at the Summer School in Cultural Studies, Jyvaskyla, June 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Stuart, Ian Connell, and Lidia Curti. 2007. “The ‘Unity’ of Current Affairs Television.” In CCCS Selected Working Papers, edited by Ann Gray, Jan Campbell, Mark Erickson, Stuart Hanson and Helen Wood, Vol. 2, 326–364. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, Thomas, and Claudia Mellado. 2011. “What Shapes the News around the World? How Journalists in Eighteen Countries Perceive Influences on Their Work.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (3): 404–426. doi: 10.1177/1940161211407334
   Google Scholar
• Havens, Timothy, and Amanda D. Lotz. 2012. Understanding Media Industries. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Heinonen, Ari. 2011. “The Journalist’s Relationship with Users: New Dimensions to Conventional Roles.” In Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, edited by Jane B. Singer, Alfred Hermida, David Domingo, Ari Heinonen, Steve Paulussen, Thorsten Quandt, Zvi Reich and Marina Vujnovic, 34–56. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, Nele, Wiebke Loosen, Julius Reimer, and Jan-Hindrik Schmidt. 2014. “Including the Audience: Comparing the Attitudes and Expectations of Journalists and users Towards Participation in German TV News Journalism.” Journalism Studies 15 (4): 411–430. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2013.831232
   Google Scholar
• Hermes, Joke. 2013. “Cought: Critical versus Everyday Perspectives on Television.” In After the Break, 35–50. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermida, Alfred, and Neil Thurman. 2008. “A Clash of Cultures: The Integration of User-Generated Content within Professional Journalistic Frameworks at British Newspaper Websites.” Journalism Practice 2 (3): 343–356. doi: 10.1080/17512780802054538
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry, Sam Ford, and Joshua Green. 2013. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. London: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Joli. 1984. “An Interpretive Appraoch to Culture Production.” In Interpreting Television: Current Research Perspectives, 98–118. Beverly Hills: SAGE publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, Susan. 2011. “Shifting Circles: Reconceptualizing Shoemaker and Reese’s Theory of a Hierarchy of Influences on Media Content for a Newer Media Era.” Web Journal of Mass Communication Research 29: 1–1.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, Sonia M. 2005. Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere. Changing Media-Changing Europe Series, v. 2. Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Mortelmans, Dimitri. 2007. Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden. Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Eggo. 2009. “Formatted Spaces of Participation: Interactive Television and the Changing Relationship between Production and Consumption.” In Digital Material: Tracing New Media in Everyday Life and Technology, edited by Marianne van den Boomen, 49–63. MediaMatters. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, John, and Ari Heinonen. 2008. “Old Values, New Media: Journalism Role Perceptions in a Changing World.” Journalism Practice 2 (3): 357–371. doi: 10.1080/17512780802281081
   Google Scholar
• Paulussen, Steve. 2016. “Innovation in the Newsroom.” In SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism, edited by Tamara Witschge, C. W. Anderson, David Domingo and Alfred Hermida, 192–206. Los Angeles: SAGE reference.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Chris, and Tamara Witschge. 2015. “From Grand Narratives of Democracy to Small Expectations of Participation: Audiences, Citizenship, and Interactive Tools in Digital Journalism.” Journalism Practice 9 (1): 19–34. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2014.928455
   Google Scholar
• Reese, Stephen D. 2001. “Understanding the Global Journalist: A Hierarchy-of-Influences Approach.” Journalism Studies 2 (2): 173–187. doi: 10.1080/14616700118394
   Google Scholar
• Reese, Stephen D., and Pamela J. Shoemaker. 2016. “A Media Sociology for the Networked Public Sphere: The Hierarchy of Influences Model.” Mass Communication and Society 19 (4): 389–410. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2016.1174268
   Google Scholar
• Reul, Robin, Steve Paulussen, Danielle Raeijmaekers, Laurens van der Steen, and Pieter Maeseele. 2016. “Professional Journalistic Routines and the Protest Paradigm: The Big Potato Swap in Traditional and Alternative Media.” Journalism, first published online: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Jay. 2008. “The People Formerly Known as the Audience.” In Participation and Media Production: Critical Reflections on Content Creation, edited by Nico Carpentier and Benjamin De Cleen, 163–165. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ryfe, David. 2012. Can Journalism Survive?: An inside Look at American Newsrooms. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, Michael. 1989. “The Sociology of News Production.” Media, Culture & Society 11 (3): 263–282. doi: 10.1177/016344389011003002
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, Pamela J. 1991. Gatekeeping. Communication Concepts 3. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, Pamela J., and Stephen D. Reese. 1996. Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. 2nd ed. White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Spigel, Lynn. 2006. “Introduction.” In Television after TV: Essays on a Medium in Transition. 2nd ed., edited by Lynn Spigel and Jan Olsson, 1–34. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, Line Hassall. 2014. “Ethnographic Fieldwork: Studying Journalists at Work.” In SAGE Research Methods Cases. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/978144627305014539108.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Graeme. 2010. Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn. Theory, Culture & Society. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, Nikki. 2014. Making News at the New York Times. The New Media World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bulck, Hilde, and Karen Donders. 2016. “Naar Een Nieuwe Beheersovereenkomst. Multistakeholdersonderhandelingen En Politiek.” In Een VRT Voor Morgen of Morgen Geen VRT Meer? De Publieke Omroep Tussen Politiek, Publiek, Partners En Concurrenten, edited by Tim Raats, Hilde Van den Bulck and Leen d’Haenens, 179–200. Kalmthout: Pelckmans Pro (GPRC label).
   Google Scholar
• VRT. 2015. “Beheersovereenkomst 2016-2020 tussen de Vlaamse Gemeenschap en VRT.” Brussels: VRT.
   Google Scholar