References
- AIMC. 2018. Resumen General (Abril a Marzo de 2018). https://www.aimc.es/a1mc-c0nt3nt/uploads/2018/04/resumegm118.pdf.
- Alcibar, Miguel. 2018. “Information Visualisation as a Resource for Popularising the Technical-Biomedical Aspects of the Last Ebola Virus Epidemic: The Case of the Spanish Reference Press.” Public Understanding of Science 27 (3): 365–381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517702047.
- Allen, Ira, and Saul Allen. 2016. “God Terms and Activity Systems: A Definition of Religion for Political Science.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (3): 557–570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916654014.
- Allum, Nick, Elissa Sibley, Patrick Sturgis, and Paul Stoneman. 2014. “Religious Beliefs, Knowledge About Science and Attitudes Towards Medical Genetics.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (7): 833–849. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513492485.
- Alonso-Flores, Javier, and Carolina Moreno-Castro. 2018. “Does Science Communication Enhance Researcher Impact? A Survey among Scientists at Spanish Universities.” Journal of Education & Social Policy 5 (2), https://www.jespnet.com/journals/Vol_5_No_2_June_2018/5.pdf.
- Amend, Elyse, Gabriela Capurro, and David M. Secko. 2014. “The Use of Science Journalism Models to Clarify the Impacts of Alternative Forms of Production.” Journalism Practice 6 (8). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.868146.
- Arruga, Maria Victoria. 2017. “Mecanismos biológicos intrínsecos a la identidad humana: transhumanismo y poshumanismo.” Crítica 1024: 6–19. http://www.revista-critica.es/2017/11/13/mecanismos-biologicos-intrinsecos-a-la-identidad-humana-transhumanismo-y-poshumanismo/.
- Artigas, Mariano, Thomas F. Glick, and Rafael A. Martinez. 2006. Negotiating Darwin: The Vatican Confronts Evolution, 1877–1902. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Bauer, Martin W., Nick Allum, and Steve Miller. 2007. “What Can We Learn from 25 Years of PUS Survey Research? Liberating and Expanding the Agenda.” Public Understanding of Science 16 (1): 79–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071287.
- Brewer, Paul R., and Barbara L. Ley. 2013. “Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment.” Science Communication 35 (1): 115–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691.
- Brossard, Dominique, Dietram K. Scheufele, Eunkyung Kim, and Bruce Lewenstein. 2009. “Religiosity as a Perceptual Filter: Examining Processes of Opinion Formation About Nanotechnology.” Public Understanding of Science 18 (5): 546–558. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507087304.
- Cacciatore, Michel A., Nick Browning, Dietram A. Scheufele, Dominique Brossard, Michael A. Xenos, and Elizabeth A. Corley. 2018. “Opposing Ends of the Spectrum: Exploring Trust in Scientific and Religious Authorities.” Public Understanding of Science 27 (1): 11–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516661090.
- Cassany, Roger, Sergi Cortiñas-Rovira, and Albert Elduque. 2018. “Communicating Science: The Profile of Science Journalists in Spain.” Comunicar 26 (55): 09–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-01.
- CIS. 2008. Religiosidad (I). http://www.cis.es/cis/export/sites/default/-Archivos/Marginales/2740_2759/2752/e275200.html.
- CIS. 2018. Barómetro de Marzo. http://www.cis.es/cis/export/sites/default/-Archivos/Marginales/3200_3219/3207/es3207mar.pdf.
- Clement, Pierre. 2015. “Creationism, Science and Religion: A Survey of Teachers’ Conceptions in 30 Countries.” Social and Behavioral Sciences 167 (8): 279–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.675.
- Coenen, Christopher. 2016. “El discurso sobre la biología sintética y la innovación responsable. Observaciones desde una perspectiva histórica.” Isegoría 55: 393–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2016.055.01.
- Cortiñas-Rovira, Sergi, and Felipe Alonso-Marcos. 2014. “La decadencia de la sección de ciencia en lo medios tradicionales.” Prisma Social 12 (12): 402–435. http://www.isdfundacion.org/publicaciones/revista/numeros/12/secciones/tematica/t-12-decadencia-medios.html.
- Deuze, M. 2011. “Media Life.” Media, Culture & Society 33 (1): 137–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710386518.
- Díez-Bosch, Míriam, Josep Lluis Micó-Sanz, and Alba Sabaté-Gauxachs. 2018. “Construcción de comunidades online a partir de comunidades presenciales consolidadas. El caso de la Iglesia Católica en internet.” El Profesional de la Información 27 (6): 12–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.09.
- Dominguez, Marti, Ingrid Lafita, and Anna Mateu. 2017. “Taking Climate Change Seriously: An Analysis of Op-Ed Articles in Spanish Press.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (7): 861–871. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516641844.
- Ecklund, Elaine Howard, David R. Johnson, Christopher P. Scheitle, Kristin R. W. Mattheuws, and Steven W. Lewis. 2016. “Religion Among Scientists in International Context. A New Study of Scientists in Eight Regions.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 2: 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116664353.
- Elías, Carlos. 2015. Big data y periodismo en la sociedad red. Madrid: Síntesis.
- Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
- Erviti, Maria Carmen. 2018. “El cambio climático en la agenda mediática: alertas, silencios y controversias.” In Los medios de comunicación como difusores del cambio climático, edited by Daniel Rodrigo-Cano, Patricia de-Casas-Moreno, and Pablo Toboso-Alonso, 67–86. Madrid: Egreguius.
- Evans, Michael S. 2012. “Supporting Science: Reasons, Restrictions, and the Role of Religion.” Science Communication 34 (3): 334–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547011417890.
- FECYT. 2014. Percepción Social de la Ciencia y la Tecnología 2014. Madrid: Fundación Española de Ciencia y Tecnología. https://www.fecyt.es/es/node/3118/pdf-viewer.
- FECYT. 2016. Percepción Social de la Ciencia y la Tecnología 2016. Madrid: Fundación Española de Ciencia y Tecnología. https://www.fecyt.es/es/node/4137/pdf-viewer.
- Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780405.
- Gebauer, Jochen L., Delroy L. Paulhus, and Wiebke Neberich. 2013. “Big Two Personality and Religiosity Across Cultures: Communals as Religious Conformists and Agentics as Religious Contrarians.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 4 (1): 21–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612442553.
- Génova, Francisco J. 2017. “Inteligencia artificial y transhumanismo. Un reto teológico.” Revista Aragonesa de Teología 23 (46): 77–94.
- Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Edit. Aldine Pub.
- Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- González-Pedraz, Cristina, Ana Victoria Pérez-Rodriguez, Eva Campos-Domínguez, and Miguel A. Quintanilla. 2017. “Comparative Analysis of Spanish Universities Presence in National and Local Digital Press.” Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 9 (72): 861–882. doi:https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1197.
- Groves, Tamar, Carlos G. Figuerola, and Miguel A. Quintanilla. 2016. “Ten Years of Science News: A Longitudinal Analysis of Scientific Culture in the Spanish Digital Press.” Public Understanding of Science 25 (6): 691–705. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515576864.
- Hanusch, Folker. 2012. “The Visibility of Disaster Deaths in News Images. A Comparison of Newspapers from 15 Countries.” International Communication Gazette 74 (7): 655–672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048512458560.
- Hefner, Philip. 2009. “The Animal That Aspires to Be an Angel: The Challenge of Transhumanism.” Dialog: A Journal of Theology 48 (2): 164–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6385.2009.00451.x.
- Henne, Peter S. 2012. “The Two Swords: Religion–State Connections.” Journal of Peace Research 49 (6): 753–768. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312456225.
- Hjarvard, Stig. 2012. “Three Forms of Mediatized Religion. Changing the Public Face of Religion.” In Mediatization and Religion. Nordic Perspectives, edited by Stig Hjarvard and Mia Lövheim, 21–44. Göteborg: Nordicom.
- Illouz, Eva. 2008. Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley: CA: University of California Press.
- Johnson, David, Elaine Howard Ecklund, Di Di, and R. K. Matthews. 2018. “Responding to Richard: Celebrity and (Mis)Representation of Science.” Public Understanding of Science 27 (5): 535–549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516673501.
- Keel, Terence D. 2013. “Religion, Polygenism and the Early Science of Human Origins.” History of the Human Sciences 26 (2): 3–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695113482916.
- Knudsen, Sanne. 2017. “Thinking Inside the Frame: A Framing Analysis of the Humanities in Danish Print News Media.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (8): 908–924. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517693452.
- Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Lewis, Seth, Rodrigo Zamith, and Alfred Hermida. 2013. “Content Analysis in an Era of Big Data: A Hybrid Approach to Computational and Manual Methods.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57 (1): 34–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.761702.
- Lipovetsky, Gilles. 2007. La felicidad paradójica. Ensayo sobre la sociedad de hiperconsumo. Barcelona: Anagrama.
- Llera, Jose A. 2003. “Una historia abreviada de la prensa satírica en España: desde El duende crítico de Madrid hasta Gedeón.” Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 9: 203–214. http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ESMP/article/view/ESMP0303110203A/12690.
- López-Cantos, Francisco. 2015. “Communication Research Using BigData Methodology.” Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 70: 878–890. doi:https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2015-1076en.
- López-Cantos, Francisco. 2017a. Cultura visual y conocimiento científico. Comunicación transmedia de la Ciencia en la era BigData. Barcelona: UOC.
- López-Cantos, Francisco. 2017b. “Comunicación pública de la ciencia y ética periodística. La representación del bosón de Higgs.” Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico 23 (2): 1199–1213. doi:https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.58040.
- Mauri-Rios, Marcel, Marta Perez-Pereira, and Monica Figueras-Mas. 2014. “The Public and the Journalists’ Views on the Humoristic Treatment of Religion in Spain.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91 (3): 471–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014538830.
- Merton, Robert K. 1938. “Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England.” Osiris 4 (4): 360–632. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/368484.
- Moreno-Castro, Carolina. 2011. Periodismo y divulgación científica. Tendencias en el ámbito iberoamericano. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva / OEI-Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos.
- Moreno-Castro, Carolina. 2015. “La influencia de los medios de comunicación sobre el efecto Weber: Correlación entre las noticias publicadas sobre la vacuna del VPH y las alertas registradas en farmacovigilancia.” Panace@ 16 (42): 537–1964. http://www.medtrad.org/panacea/IndiceGeneral/n42_tribuna-CMorenoCastro.pdf.
- Morozov, Evgeny. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
- Nuñez, Juan P. 2018. “Hombres y máquinas. Futuro y límites del transhumanismo.” Razón y fe 278 (1434): 73–82.
- OJD. 2018. Datos mensuales, Noviembre. https://extranet.introl.es/web_ojd/DatosMensuales_ojd.aspx?codigoclasificacion=1.
- Peifer, Jared L., Simranjit Khalsa, and Elaine Howard Ecklund. 2016. “Political Conservatism, Religion, and Environmental Consumption in the United States.” Environmental Politics 25 (661): 689. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1159604.
- Postigo, Elena. 2010. “Transhumanismo y posthumano. Principios teóricos e implicaciones bioéticas.” Medicina y ética 21 (1): 65–83. http://dspace.ceu.es/bitstream/10637/3694/2/EPostigotranshumanismo.pdf.
- Pou, Maria Jose. 2008. “El hecho religioso y su tratamiento periodístico: limitaciones y dificultades.” Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico 14: 561–573. http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ESMP/article/view/ESMP0808110561A/12003.
- Requena, Miguel, and Mikolaj Stanek. 2014. “Religiosity and Politics in Spain and Poland: A Period Effect Analysis.” Social Compass 61 (3): 348–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768614535704.
- Roos, J. Micah. 2014. “Measuring Science or Religion? A Measuring Analysis of the National Science Foundation Sponsored Science Literacy Scale 2006–2010.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (7): 797–813. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512464318.
- Scheitle, Christopher P., and Elaine Howard Ecklund. 2017. “The Influence of Science Popularizers on the Public’s View of Religion and Science: An Experimental Assessment.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (1): 25–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515588432.
- Scheitle, Christopher P., David R. Johnson, and Elaine Howard Ecklund. 2018. “Scientists and Religious Leaders Compete for Cultural Authority of Science.” Public Understanding of Science 27 (1): 59–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517718145.
- Scheufele, Dietram A., Elizabeth A. Corley, Thsung-jeng Shih, Kaysa E. Dalrymple, and Shirley S. Ho. 2009. “Religious Beliefs and Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology in Europe and the United States.” Nature Nanotechnology 4: 91–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.361.
- Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Summ, Annika, and Anna-Maria Volpers. 2016. “What’s Science? Where’s Science? Science Journalism in German Print Media.” Public Understanding of Science 25 (7): 775–790. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515583419.
- Torres-Albero, Cristobal, and Josep A. Lobera. 2017. “El declive de la fe en el progreso. Posmaterialismo, ideología y religiosidad en las representaciones sociales de la tecnociencia.” Revista Internacional de Sociología 75 (3): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2017.75.3.16.61.
- Vallverdú, Jaume. 2016. “Tecnología y religión. Diseño teórico de una investigación en curso.” Arxius de Sociología 34: 169–183. http://roderic.uv.es/handle/10550/57368.
- Vásquez, Manuel. 2011. More Than Belief: A Materialist Theory of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wald, Kenneth D., and Corwin E. Smidt. 1993. “Measurement Strategies in the Study of Religion and Politics.” In Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics, edited by David C. Leege and Lyman A. Kellstedt, 26–49. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
- Wilcox, Sarah A. 2010. “Cultural Context and the Conventions of Science Journalism: Drama and Contradiction in Media Coverage of Biological Ideas About Sexuality.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 20 (3): 225–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180302772.