International Broadcasting During Times of Conflict: A Comparison of China’s and Russia's Communication Strategies

REFERENCES

• Abrams, S. 2016. “Beyond Propaganda: Soviet Active Measures in Putin’s Russia.” Connections: The Quarterly Journal 15 (1): 5–31. doi:10.11610/Connections.15.1.01.
   Google Scholar
• Alpermann, B. 2020. “‘In other news’: China’s International Media Strategy on Xinjiang –CGTN and Xinhua on YouTube.” Paper presented at the Association for Social Science Research on China (ASC) Annual, Ludwigshafen, October.
   Google Scholar
• Atlantic Council. 2020. “Chinese Discourse Power: China’s Use of Information Manipulation in Regional and Global Competition.” Atlantic Council.
   Google Scholar
• Atwater, T., and N. F. Green. 1988. “News Sources in Network Coverage of International Terrorism.” Journalism Quarterly 65 (4): 967–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avgerinos, K. P. 2009. “Russia’s Public Diplomacy Effort: What the Kremlin is Doing and Why It’s Not Working.” Journal of Public and International Affairs 20: 115–132.
   Google Scholar
• Barghoorn, F. C. 2015. Soviet Foreign Propaganda. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomé, G., S. Lecheler, and C. de Vreese. 2018. “Towards A Typology of Conflict Frames: Substantiveness and Interventionism in Political Conflict News.” Journalism Studies 19 (12): 1689–1711. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2017.1299033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabdallah, L. 2017. “Explaining Attractiveness: Knowledge Production and Power Projection in China’s Policy for Africa.” Journal of International Relations and Development 22: 495–514. doi:10.1057/s41268-017-0109-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. 1996. “An Introduction to Journalism Norms and Representations of Politics.” Political Communication 13 (4): 373–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensa, C. P., and L. Wijaya. 2017. “Media Propaganda Techniques in the South China Sea Dispute.” Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia 2: 1–5. doi:10.25008/jkiski.v2i1.93.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, L. 2019. “The Legal Impact of the South China Sea Arbitration Award on Indonesia.” Australian Institute of International Affairs. http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/the-legal-impact-of-the-south-china-sea-arbitration-award-on-indonesia/.
   Google Scholar
• Bērziņš, J., A. Jaeski, M. Laity, N. Maliukevicius, A. Navys, G. Osborne, and S. Tatham. 2015. “Analysis of Russia’s information campaign against Ukraine.” NATO StratCom Report.
   Google Scholar
• Biersack, J., and S. O’Lear. 2014. “The Geopolitics of Russia’s Annexation of Crimea: Narratives, Identity, Silences, and Energy.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 55 (3): 247–269. doi:10.1080/15387216.2014.985241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjola, C., J. Cassidy, and I. Manor. 2019. “Public Diplomacy in the Digital Age.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 14 (1–2): 83–101. doi:10.1163/1871191X-14011032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, A.-M. 2015. “China’s Foreign Propaganda Machine.” Journal of Democracy 26 (4): 51–59. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. 2008. “Public Diplomacy & Propaganda: Their Differences [WWW Document].” Am. Dipl. https://americandiplomacy.web.unc.edu/2008/09/public-diplomacy-propaganda-their-differences/. Accessed 9.3.22.
   Google Scholar
• Borchers, N. S. 2011. “‘Do You Really Think Russia Should Pay Up for That?’: How the Russia-Based TV Channel RT Constructs Russian-Baltic Relations. ” Javnost - The Public 18 (4): 89–106. doi:10.1080/13183222.2011.11009069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, J. P. 1989. The Chinese Communist Party’s Nomenklatura System. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, E. B., and B. L. Carter. 2021. “Questioning More: Rt, Outward-Facing Propaganda, and the Post-West World Order.” Security Studies 30 (1): 49–78. doi:10.1080/09636412.2021.1885730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCTV English. 2016. “President Xi Urges New Media Outlet to ‘Tell China Stories Well’.” CCTV.Com, December 31. http://english.cctv.com/2016/12/31/ARTIdbvXHYpQnQ35nWBGttZg161231.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016a. “Cambodia: Carter wrong about South China Sea, June 4.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WauC6zypAoE.
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016b. “Chinese FM insists on settling South China Sea disputes via bilateral negotiation, June 7.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlfdWx1FVH4.
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016c. “China will never accept nor recognize whatever ruling the South China Sea arbitral tribunal produces, July 6.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3sTUQfUUjI.
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016d. “African media voice support for China’s stance on South China Sea, July 10.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIrZ9UEcoO0.
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016e. “US naval ship visits Qingdao after disputed South China Sea ruling, August 9.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkOwZwuDOyg.
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016f. “China calls ASEAN members to safeguard stability in South China Sea, August 16.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzbSZzHDE_Y.
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016g. "Chinese envoy: South China Sea Arbitration will intensify conflict, July 13." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WuVO4fcZ0I
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016h. "Eco-protection in South China Sea: Sansha City gets creative for eco-friendly islands, July 10." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAFI9jF6oqs
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016i. “Philippine expert: Aquino gambled with national sovereignty, July 13”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq3h8UMSpXY
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016j. "South China Sea: China Defense Ministry refutes US ‘isolation’ remarks, June 30." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p170v6VjAA
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016k. "South China Sea dispute: Historical documents back China’s claims, June 26." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XmnXHIqmsk&t=6s
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2016l. "South China Sea: Chinese in Zimbabwe support Beijing’s stance. 2016, July 5." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oL_0VZhTt8c
   Google Scholar
• CGTN. 2020. “About us—China Global Television Network.” https://www.cgtn.com/about-us, Retrieved at September 3rd 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T.-K., and F. Lin. 2014. “From Propaganda to Public Diplomacy: Assessing China’s International Practice and its Image, 1950–2009.” Public Relations Review 40 (3): 450–458. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernobrov, D., and E. L. Briant. 2020. “Competing Propagandas: How the United States and Russia Represent Mutual Propaganda Activities.” Politics: 393–409. doi:10.1177/0263395720966171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. E. 1998. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. 2010. Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• CSIS. 2014. “Rossiya Segodnya: The National Champion of News.” Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/blogs/post-soviet-post/rossiya-segodnya-national-champion-news.
   Google Scholar
• Cull, N. J. 2008. “Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 31–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cull, N. J. 2013. “Roof for a House Divided: How U.S. Propaganda Evolved Into Public Diplomacy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Propaganda Studies, edited by J. Auerbach and R. Castronovo, 131–146. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, H. 2016. “Constructing Cooperation: Chinese Ontological Security Seeking in the South China Sea Dispute.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 31 (4): 537–549. doi:10.1080/08865655.2015.1066698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, X. 1974. “Speech to the Special Session of the UN General Assembly, 10 April 1974.” Peking Review, Supplement To 15: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• de Vreese, C. H., J. Peter, and H. A. Semetko. 2001. “Framing Politics at the Launch of the Euro: A Cross-National Comparative Study of Frames in the News.” Political Communication 18 (2): 107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Hooghe, I. 2015. China’s Public Diplomacy. Leiden: Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/24897
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L., and O. Schell. 2019. “Media.” In China’s Influence and American Interests: Promoting Constructive Vigilance, edited by Larry Diamond and Orville Schell, 99–122. Stanford: Hoover Press.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermarth, F. W. 2009. “Russian Strategic Culture in Flux: Back to the Future?” In Strategic Culture and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Culturally Based Insights Into Comparative National Security Policymaking, edited by J. L. Johnson, K. M. Kartchner, and J. A. Larsen, 85–96. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. doi:10.1057/9780230618305_6
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, T., and U. M. Rodrigues. 2019. “The Dichotomy of China Global Television Network’s News Coverage.” Pacific Journalism Review : Te Koakoa 25 (1 & 2): 102–121. doi:10.24135/pjr.v25i1.404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, H. 2007. Chinese Strategic Culture and Foreign Policy Decision-Making: Confucianism, Leadership and War. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gabore, S. M. 2020. “Western and Chinese Media Representation of Africa in COVID-19 News Coverage.” Asian Journal of Communication 30 (5): 299–316. doi:10.1080/01292986.2020.1801781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardone, I. 2013. “China as a Persuader: CCTV Africa’s First Steps in the African Mediasphere.” Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies 34 (3): 25–40. doi:10.1080/02560054.2013.834835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardone, I., and N. Pál. 2017. “Freer but not Free Enough? Chinese Journalists Finding Their Feet in Africa.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 18 (8): 1049–1063. doi:10.1177/1464884916636171
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J. 1986. “On the Role of the Media in Worldwide Security and Peace.” In Peace and Communication, edited by T. Varis, 249–266. San Jose, Costa Rica: Universidad para La Paz.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J., and M. Ruge. 1981. “Structuring and Selecting News.” In The Manufacture Of News N/E: Deviance, Social Problems and the Mass Media (2nd Revised Edition), edited by J. Young, and S. Cohen, 52–63. London: Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Gaufman, E. 2015. “Memory, Media, and Securitization: Russian Media Framing of the Ukrainian Crisis.” Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society 1 (1): 141–175.
   Google Scholar
• Ginneken, J. 2009. “Who Gets to Speak in the World News?” In Understanding Global News: A Critical Introduction, edited by Jaap van Ginneken, 85–108. New York: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi:10.4135/9781446217955
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., and P. Mancini. 2011. Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Headley, J. 2015. “Challenging the EU’s Claim to Moral Authority: Russian Talk of ‘Double Standards’.” Asia Europe Journal 13 (3): 297–307. doi:10.1007/s10308-015-0417-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herpen, M. H. V. 2015. Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Z. A., and R. Wang. 2021. “Exploring China’s Digitalization of Public Diplomacy on Weibo and Twitter: A Case Study of the U.S.–China Trade War.” International Journal of Communication 15 (0): 28.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, S., and J. Szostek. 2015. “Dominant Narratives in Russian Political and Media Discourse During the Ukraine Crisis.” In Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives, edited by Agnieszka Pikulicka-Wilczewska, and Richard Sakwa, 183–196. E-International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319–345. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, L.-J., A. Lee, and T. Guo. 2010. The Thinking Styles of Chinese People. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541850.013.0012
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and M. R. Jahng. 2016. “Who Frames Nuclear Testing? Understanding Frames and News Sources in the US and South Korean News Coverage of North Korean Nuclear Testing.” The Journal of International Communication 22 (1): 126–142. doi:10.1080/13216597.2015.1076732.
   Google Scholar
• Kiseleva, Y. 2015. “Russia’s Soft Power Discourse: Identity, Status and the Attraction of Power.” Politics 35 (3–4): 316–329. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Y. 1989. “The Sources of Soviet Strategic Culture.” The Journal of Soviet Military Studies 2 (4): 453–490. doi:10.1080/13518048908429961.
   Google Scholar
• Klemperer, V. 2013. Language of the Third Reich: LTI: Lingua Tertii Imperii (01 edition). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kluver, R., S. Cooley, and R. Hinck. 2019. “Contesting Strategic Narratives in a Global Context: The World Watches the 2016 U.S. Election.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 24 (1): 92–114. doi:10.1177/1940161218786426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremlin.ru. 2013. “Visit to Russia Today Television Channel.” President of Russia, June 11. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/18319.
   Google Scholar
• Kuok, L. 2019. “How China’s Actions in the South China Sea Undermine the Rule of Law.” Global China, November.
   Google Scholar
• Kurlantzick, J. 2007. Charm Offensive: How China’s Soft Power is Transforming the World. 需New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. 1951. The Strategy of Soviet Propaganda." Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science 24 (2): 66–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/1173235.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, D. W., and A. Shevchenko. 2014. “Russia Says no: Power, Status, and Emotions in Foreign Policy.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (3): 269–279. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, D. L., and S. D. Reese. 1990. “News Source Use in the Crash of 1987: A Study of Four National Media.” Journalism Quarterly 67 (1): 60–71. doi:10.1177/107769909006700110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. 1927. Propaganda Technique in the World war. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. A. 1998. Unreliable Sources: A Guide to Detecting Bias in News Media. Reprint Edition. New York: Kensington Publishing Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. T. 2010. “Peace Journalism: Principles and Structural Limitations in the News Coverage of Three Conflicts.” Mass Communication and Society 13 (4): 361–384. doi:10.1080/15205430903348829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M. 2008. “China Debates Soft Power.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (2): 287–308. doi:10.1093/cjip/pon011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., and V. Worm. 2011. “Building China’s Soft Power for a Peaceful Rise.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 16 (1): 69–89. doi:10.1007/s11366-010-9130-2.
   Google Scholar
• Li, A., and M. Wu. 2018. “‘See the Difference’: What Difference? The New Missions of Chinese International Communication.” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 13 (1): 41–47. doi:10.16997/wpcc.275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, L., and M. Ma. 2014. “The Role and Influence of China’s Mainstream Media in South China Sea Disputes ? An Analysis from the Perspective of Signaling.” In China and the International Society: Vol. Volume 1, edited by Jinjun Zhao and Zhirui Chen, 169–201. New Jersey: World Century Publishing Corporation. doi:10.1142/9781938134517_0007.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, D., K. Esau, L. Pavlova, D. Osipov, and N. Argylov. 2018. “Framing the Ukraine Crisis: A Comparison Between Talk Show Debates in Russian and German Television.” International Communication Gazette 81 (1): 66–88. doi:10.1177/1748048518755209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfflmann, G. 2013. “Hollywood, the Pentagon, and the Cinematic Production of National Security.” Critical Studies on Security 1 (3): 280–294. doi:10.1080/21624887.2013.820015.
   Google Scholar
• Madrid-Morales, D. 2017. “The Internationalization of Chinese Media: A Production Study of CGTN Africa.” Communication Papers 6 (11): 51–69.
   Google Scholar
• Mankoff, J. 2014. “Russia’s Latest Land Grab.” https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ukraine/2014-04-17/russias-latest-land-grab.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, V. 2017. “Tiangao or Tianxia? The Ambiguities of CCTV’s English-Language News for Africa.” In China’s Media Go Global, edited by D. K. Thussu, H. de Burgh, and A. Shi, 117–135. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matingwina, S. 2016. “China’s Public Diplomacy in Zimbabwe: Perceptions, Opportunities and Challenges.” African East-Asian Affairs 4: 96–125.
   Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, A., and J. Lynch. 2000. “Peace journalism.” https://www.transcend.org/tri/downloads/McGoldrick_Lynch_Peace-Journalism.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. 1961. “Resistance to Persuasion Conferred by Active and Passive Prior Refutation of the Same and Alternative Counterarguments.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 63 (2): 326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. 1964. “Inducing Resistance to Persuasion. Some Contemporary Approaches.” https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-Fromm/frontdoor/index/index/docId/16094.
   Google Scholar
• Miazhevich, G. 2018. “Nation Branding in the Post-Broadcast Era: The Case of RT.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 21 (5): 575–593. doi:10.1177/1367549417751228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, P. 2020. “Mind the (Cultural) Gap: International News Channels and the Challenge of Attracting Latin American Audiences.” Media Culture & Society 43 (4): 648–663. doi:10.1177/0163443720972307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. 2013. “CCTV’s international expansion: China’s grand strategy for media?[Report to the Center for International Media Assistance].” National Endowment for Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. 2016. “Russia’s Europe, 1991-2016: Inferiority to Superiority.” International Affairs 92 (6): 1381–1399. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2014. “Watchdog Journalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, 525–541. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0015
   Google Scholar
• Orttung, R. W., and E. Nelson. 2019. “Russia Today’s Strategy and Effectiveness on YouTube.” Post-Soviet Affairs 35 (2): 77–92. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2018.1531650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. 2018. “China’s Global Propaganda Is Aimed at Bosses, Not Foreigners.” Foreign Policy, October 1. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/10/01/chinas-global-propaganda-is-aimed-at-bosses-not-foreigners/.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, C., B. Isakhan, and Z. Nwokora. 2019. “Othering as Soft-Power Discursive Practice: China Daily’s Construction of Trump’s America in the 2016 Presidential Election.” Politics 40 (1): 54–69. doi:10.1177/0263395719843219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., and G. M. Kosicki. 1993. “Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse.” Political Communication 10 (1): 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Panizza, F. 2005. “Introduction: Populism and the Mirror of Democracy.” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited by F. Panizza, 1–31. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Pezard, S., A. Radin, T. Szayna, and F. Larrabee. 2017. “European Relations with Russia: Threat Perceptions, Responses, and Strategies in the Wake of the Ukrainian Crisis.” RAND Corporation. doi:10.7249/RR1579.
   Google Scholar
• Pifer, S. 2019. “Five years after Crimea’s illegal annexation, the issue is no closer to resolution.” Brookings, March 18. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/03/18/five-years-after-crimeas-illegal-annexation-the-issue-is-no-closer-to-resolution/.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. 2003. “Public Diplomacy and the Transformation of International Broadcasting.” Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 21 (1): 51–85.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., and H. Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience. doi:10.2307/1958372
   Google Scholar
• Pu, X. 2017. “Controversial Identity of a Rising China.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 10 (2): 131–149. doi:10.1093/cjip/pox004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 2013. “Visit to Russia Today television channel.” President of Russia. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/18319.
   Google Scholar
• Rabena, A. 2018. “Understanding the Philippines’ South China Sea Policy.” The Maritime Executive,https://www.maritime-executive.com/editorials/understanding-the-philippines-south-china-sea-policy.
   Google Scholar
• Rawnsley, G. D. 2013. ““Thought-Work” and Propaganda: Chinese Public Diplomacy and Public Relations After Tiananmen Square.” In Oxford Handbook of Propaganda Studies, edited by J. Auerbach, and R. Castronovo, 147–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawnsley, G. D. 2015. “To Know Us is to Love Us: Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting in Contemporary Russia and China.” Politics 35 (3–4): 273–286. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, M. L. 2017. “What We Know about RT (Russia Today).” European Values Think Tank, Prague, Czech Republic. https://www.europeanvalues.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/What-We-Know-about-RT-Russia-Today-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Riga. 2015. “Analysis of Russia’s Information Campaign against Ukraine.” NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. https://www.stratcomcoe.org/analysis-russias-information-campaign-against-ukraine.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, N., W. Wanta, and I. Buniak. 2017. “Information Wars: Eastern Ukraine Military Conflict Coverage in the Russian, Ukrainian and U.S. Newscasts.” International Communication Gazette 79 (4): 357–378. doi:10.1177/1748048516682138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RT. 2013a. "Chaos for Europe if millions of Ukrainians flood there for better life, December 8". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZtAGZXYses
   Google Scholar
• RT. 2013b. “Putin: Ukraine unrest looks like planned action, not revolution, December 2.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAcIlTaR7W4.
   Google Scholar
• RT. 2013c. “Ukraine: Era of Deep Division?, December 9”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIYJbDnhBAA.
   Google Scholar
• RT. 2013d. “Protest Mode: Where to go and what to see in revolutionary Kiev, December 14.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0eMBb1lFEs.
   Google Scholar
• RT. 2014a. “Angry Riots: Ukrainians set up catapult to fire at police, January 20.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vH5sDDh71WE.
   Google Scholar
• RT. 2014b. “Kiev Face-Off: Ukraine opposition urges snap elections, refuses president’s offer, January 25.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cle7EXjV8Y.
   Google Scholar
• RT. 2014c. “‘We can’t help now!’: Europeans question Brussels’ plan to bail out Ukraine, February 25.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p201JFRrFuI.
   Google Scholar
• RT. 2014d. "Neo-Nazi Takeover? Ultra-nationalists take center stage amid political chaos in Ukraine, March 5." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pN9u7zur2I
   Google Scholar
• RT. 2014e. "Ukraine president offers opposition leader PM post, agrees to change Constitution, January 25." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS0dWHUZt4A
   Google Scholar
• RT. 2014f. "Ukraine Turmoil: Far-right radicals on the rise amid violence in Kiev, January 24" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0ad7RQz6OQ
   Google Scholar
• RT. 2014g, February 25. ‘We can’t help now!’: Europeans question Brussels’ plan to bail out Ukraine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p201JFRrFuI
   Google Scholar
• RT. 2020. “The first TV news network in the world to hit 10 bln views on Youtube RT.” RT International, January 29. https://www.rt.com/about-us/press-releases/rt-youtube-10-billion-views/.
   Google Scholar
• SCMP. 2009. “Beijing in 45b yuan Global Media Drive.” South China Morning Post, January 13, 2009. https://www.scmp.com/article/666847/beijing-45b-yuan-global-media-drive.
   Google Scholar
• Seib, P. 2009. “Public Diplomacy and Journalism: Parallels, Ethical Issues, and Practical Concerns.” American Behavioral Scientist 52: 772–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semetko, H., and P. Valkenburg. 2000. “Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News.” Journal of Communication 50 (2): 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shambaugh, D. 2017. “China’s Propaganda System: Institutions, Processes and Efficacy.” In Critical Readings on Communist Party of China, edited by K. E. Brodsgaard, 713–751. Leiden: BRILL.
   Google Scholar
• Sheafer, T., and I. Gabay. 2009. “Mediated Public Diplomacy: A Strategic Contest Over International Agenda Building and Frame Building.” Political Communication 26 (4): 447–467. doi:10.1080/10584600903297240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultz, R. H., and R. Godson. 1984. Dezinformatsia: Active Measures in Soviet Strategy. 1st ed. Oxford: Pergamon-Brassey’s.
   Google Scholar
• Šimalčík, M. 2020. “China and the South China Sea Conflict: A Case for Confucian Strategic Culture?” The Journal of Indian and Asian Studies 1 (1): 1–33. doi:10.1142/S2717541320500023.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, G. 2011. “Attempting to Re-Brand the Branded: Russia’s International Image in the 21st Century.” Russian Journal of Communication 4 (3–4): 322–350. doi:10.1080/19409419.2011.10756816.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, G. 2015. “Taking the New Public Diplomacy Online: Russia and China.” Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 11 (2): 111–124. doi:10.1057/pb.2014.22.
   Google Scholar
• Simonyan, M. 2016. “The View from Russia: ‘Your News Channel’ Is Here to Stay.” In The Future of 24-Hour News New Directions, New Challenges, edited by S. Cushion, and R. Sambrook, 49–62. New York: Peter Lang. https://www.peterlang.com/view/9781433136948/14_Chapter04.xhtml.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. W., and S. Rossit. 2018. “Identifying and Detecting Facial Expressions of Emotion in Peripheral Vision.” PLOS ONE 13 (5): e0197160. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. L. 1977. “The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Limited Nuclear Operations.” [Product Page]. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R2154.html.
   Google Scholar
• Strating, R. 2020. “Norm Contestation, Statecraft and the South China Sea: Defending Maritime Order.” The Pacific Review 35 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1080/09512748.2020.1804990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S. 2009. “Chinese Soft Power, Insecurity Studies, Myopia and Fantasy.” Third World Quarterly 30 (4): 779–793. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40388149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szostek, J. 2020. “What Happens to Public Diplomacy During Information war? Critical Reflections on the Conceptual Framing of International Communication.” International Journal of Communication 14: 2728–2748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankard, J. W. 1991. “Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented to the “Communication Theory and Methodology Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Convention, Boston.” Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Tolz, V. 2001. Inventing the Nation: Russia. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Tsvetkova, N. 2020. “Russian Digital Diplomacy: A Rising Cyber Soft Power?” In Russia’s Public Diplomacy: Evolution and Practice, edited by A. A. Velikaya, and G. Simons, 103–117. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12874-6_6
   Google Scholar
• Tuchman, G. C. 1980. Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varrall, M. 2015. Chinese Worldviews and China’s Foreign Policy. Lowy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Velikaya, A. A., and G. Simons. 2020. Russia’s Public Diplomacy: Evolution and Practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12874-6
   Google Scholar
• Von Twickel, N. 2010. “Russia Today Courts Viewers With Controversy.” The Moscow Times, March 23. http://www.themoscowtimes.com/sitemap/free/2010/3/article/russia-today-courts-viewers-with-controversy/401888.html.
   Google Scholar
• The Washington Post. 2022. “Social Platforms’ Bans Muffle Russian State Media Propaganda.” Washington Post, March 16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/16/facebook-youtube-russian-bans/.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C., J. Ludwig, J. Cardenal, J. Kucharczyk, G. Mesežnikov, and G. Pleschová. 2017. Sharp Power: Rising Authoritarian Influence. Washington, DC: National Endowment for Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J., T. Schirato, and G. Danaher. 2002. Understanding Bourdieu. Crows Nest, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. L. 2015. “Russia and China Respond to Soft Power: Interpretation and Readaptation of a Western Construct.” Politics 35 (3–4): 287–300. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittebols, J. H. 1996. “News from the Noninstitutional World: US and Canadian Television News Coverage of Social Protest.” Political Communication 13 (3): 345–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, S., and O. Boyd-Barrett. 2015. “External-National TV News Networks’ Way to America: Is the United States Losing the Global ‘Information War’?” International Journal of Communication 9: 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. X. 2017. "Soft Power and the Strategic Context for China’s ‘Media Going Global’ Policy. In China’s Media Go Global, 79–100. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yablokov, I. 2015. “Conspiracy Theories as a Russian Public Diplomacy Tool: The Case of Russia Today (RT).” Politics 35 (3–4): 301–315. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. 2017. “The Decline of U.S. Influence is the Great Global Story of our Age.” Washington Post, December 28. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/the-decline-of-us-influence-is-the-great-global-story-of-our-times/2017/12/28/bfe48262-ebf6-11e7-9f92-10a2203f6c8d_story.html.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. 2014. “Understand China’s Media in Africa from the perspective of Constructive Journalism.” Paper presented at the international conference: China and Africa Media, Communications and Public Diplomacy.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and S. Matingwina. 2016. “A New Representation of Africa? The Use of Constructive Journalism in the Narration of Ebola by China Daily and the BBC.” African Journalism Studies 37 (3): 19–40. doi:10.1080/23743670.2016.1209224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and D. O. Ong’ong’a. 2021. “Unveiling China’s Digital Diplomacy: A Comparative Analysis of CGTN Africa and BBC News Africa on Facebook.” Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 7 (3): 661–683. doi:10.1177/20578911211068217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, K. 2015. “The Motivation Behind China’s Public Diplomacy.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 8 (2): 167–196. doi:10.1093/cjip/pov005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. 2018. “China and the South China Sea Arbitration: Geopolitics Versus International Law.” Journal of Contemporary China 27 (109): 1–15. doi:10.1080/10670564.2017.1363012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. 2021. “Xi emphasizes South-South cooperation.” China Daily, July 9. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202107/09/WS60e6957ca310efa1bd66094e.html.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. 2022. “China’s ‘New Cultural Diplomacy’ in International Broadcasting: Branding the Nation Through CGTN Documentary.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 28 (6): 671–683. doi:10.1080/10286632.2021.2022651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z., and Y. Jiang. 2018. “Russia Today’s Strategy for YouTube Reports and Its Enlightenment(今日俄罗斯 YouTube 报道策略及启示).” Chinese Journalist(中国记者) 4: 118–121.
   Google Scholar