The “American Dream” for Whom? Contouring Filipinos’ and Filipino/a/x Americans’ Discursive Negotiation of Postcolonial Identities

References

• Ahmed, S. (2007). A phenomenology of whiteness. Feminist Theory, 8(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700107078139
   Google Scholar
• Alley-Young, G. (2008). Articulating identity: Refining postcolonial and whiteness perspectives on race within communication studies. Review of Communication, 8(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358590701845311
   Google Scholar
• Asante, G. (2016). Glocalized whiteness: Sustaining and reproducing whiteness through “skin-toning” in post-colonial Ghana. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 9(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2016.1154184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, K. (2012). Uncovering the gay interculturalist. In N. Bardhan & M. Orbe (Eds.), Identity research and communication: Intercultural reflections and future directions (pp. 213–225). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Casumbal-Salazar, M. S. (2015). The indeterminacy of the Philippine indigenous subject: Indigeneity, temporality, and cultural governance. Amerasia Journal, 41(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.17953/aj.41.1.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chávez, K. (2015). Beyond inclusion: Rethinking rhetoric’s historical narrative. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2015.994908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantino, R. (1970). The mis-education of the Filipino. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 1(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472337085390031
   Google Scholar
• David, E. J. R. (2013). Brown skin, white minds: Filipino/American postcolonial psychology. Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• David, E. J. R., & Nadal, K. L. (2013). The colonial context of Filipino American immigrants’ psychological experiences. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19(3), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, E. J. R., & Okazaki, S. (2006). Colonial mentality: A review and recommendation for Filipino American psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.12.1.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De La Garza, A., & Ono, K. (2015). Retheorizing adaptation: Differential adaptation and critical intercultural communication. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 8(4), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2015.1087097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, J. M. (2018). Balikbayan configurations and a US-Philippine politics of modernization. Journal of Asian American Studies, 21(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2018.0001
   Google Scholar
• Eguchi, S., Calafell, B., & Abdi, S. (2020). De-whitening intersectionality: Race, intercultural communication and politics. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fajardo, K. B. (2014). Queering and transing the Great Lakes: Filipino/a tomboy masculinities and manhoods across waters. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 20(1-2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2370387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks. Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischter-Lichte, E. (2008). The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, L. (2016). Between abundance and marginalization: The imperative of racial rhetorical criticism. Review of Communication, 16(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2016.1183871
   Google Scholar
• Foley, N. (2010). Quest for equality: The failed promise of black-brown solidarity. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallardo, L. H., & Batalova, J. (2020). Filipino immigrants in the United States. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/filipino-immigrants-united-states
   Google Scholar
• Houston, M. (1992). The politics of difference: Race, class and women’s communication. In L. F. Rakow (Ed.), Women making meaning (pp. 45–59). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, P. (1995). Including America. Ariel, 26(1), 117–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor, I. (2004). Hyper-self-reflexive development? Spivak on representing the Third World ‘Other’. Third World Quarterly, 25(4), 627–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590410001678898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendi, I. X. (2019). How to be an antiracist. One World/Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2000). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kuykendall, R. (2017). Whiteness as antidialogical. In T. Kennedy, J. Middleton, & K. Ratcliffe (Eds.), Rhetorics of whiteness: Postracial hauntings in popular culture, social media, and education (pp. 295–309). SIU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, B., & Chen, Y.-W. (2019). Developing a method of critical thematic analysis for qualitative communication inquiry. Howard Journal of Communications, 30(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2018.1439423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuLevitt, C., & Calafell, B. (2019). Reverberations of familial and cultural histories: Performances of working with and against whiteness. In D. McIntosh, D. Moon, & T. K. Nakayama (Eds.), Interrogating the communicative power of whiteness (pp. 46–62). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mejia, R., Beckermann, K., & Sullivan, C. (2018). White lies: A racial history of the (post)truth. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 15(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2018.1456668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, S. L. (2005). Tears in the archive: Creating memory to survive and contest empire. In R. Lustig & J. Koester (Eds.), Among US: Essays on identity, belonging, and intercultural competence (pp. 233–245). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, S. L. L. (2002). Bridging theory and cultural politics: Revisiting the indigenization-poststructuralism debates in Filipino and Filipino-American struggles for identity. In M. J. Collier (Ed.), Intercultural alliances: Critical transformation (pp. 249–277). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J. E. (1999). Disidentifications: Queers of color and the performance of politics. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama, T. K., & Krizek, R. L. (1995). Whiteness: A strategic rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639509384117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na’puti, T. R. (2020). Oceanic possibilities for communication studies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1723802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocampo, A. (2014). Are second-generation Filipinos “becoming” Asian American or Latino? Historical colonialism, culture and panethnicity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.765022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocampo, A. C. (2016). The Latinos of Asia: How Filipino Americans break the rules of race. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2015). Racial formation in the United States. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ono, K. A. (1995). Re/signing “Asian American”: Rhetorical problematics of nation. Amerasia Journal, 21(1-2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.17953/amer.21.1-2.7155vn78139t4057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, K., & Cheung, A. Y. (2019). Asian American performance in white supremacist representation. In D. McIntosh, D. Moon, & T. K. Nakayama (Eds.), Interrogating the communicative power of whiteness (pp. 33–49). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revilla, L. A. (1997). Filipino American identity: Transcending the crisis. In M. P. P. Root (Ed.), Filipino Americans: transformation and identity (pp. 95–111). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rondilla, J. L. (2009). Filipinos and the color complex. In E. N. Glenn (Ed.), Shades of difference (pp. 61–80). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiao, J. (2017). The meaning of honorary whiteness for Asian Americans: Boundary expansion or something else? Comparative Sociology, 16(6), 788–813. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shome, R. (1998). Caught in the term “post-colonial”: Why the “post-colonial” still matters. Review and Criticism, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039809367043
   Google Scholar
• Shome, R. (1999). Whiteness and the politics of location: Postcolonial reflections. In T. K. Nakayama & J. Martin (Eds.), Whiteness: The communication of social identity (pp. 107–128). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Shome, R., & Hegde, R. S. (2002). Postcolonial approaches to communication: Charting the terrain, engaging the intersections. Communication Theory, 12(3), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00269.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobel, L. M. (1993). A personal story: Becoming a split Filipina subject. Amerasia Journal, 19(3), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.17953/amer.19.3.54244m0kx1454744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyosaki, S. (2016). Praxis-oriented whiteness research. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 11(3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1073735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vimalassery, M., Pegues, J. H., & Goldstein, A. (2016). Introduction: On colonial unknowing. Theory & Event, 19(4). https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/633283
   Google Scholar
• Yancy, G. (2016). Black bodies, white gazes: The continuing significance of race in America. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar