A taxonomy of generative poetry techniques

References

• M. Abrams, Theories of Poetry, in The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, R. Greene, S. Cushman, C. Cavanagh, J. Ramazani, and P. Rouzer, eds., Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1974, pp. 639–649.
   Google Scholar
• M. Agirrezabal, B. Arrieta, A. Astigarraga, and M. Hulden, POS-tag based poetry generation with WordNet, in Proceedings of the 14th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2013, pp. 162–166.
   Google Scholar
• A.E. Balakian, Dadaism, in The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, R. Greene, S. Cushman, C. Cavanagh, J. Ramazani, and P. Rouzer, eds., Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1974, p. 180.
   Google Scholar
• G. Barbieri, F. Pachet, P. Roy, and M.D. Esposti, Markov constraints for generating lyrics with style, in Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, L. De Raedt, C. Bessiere, D. Dubois, P. Doherty, and P. Frasconi, eds., IOS Press, Montpelier, France, 2012, pp. 115–120.
   Google Scholar
• M.C. Beardsley, On the creation of art, J. Aesthetics Art Criticism 23 (1965), pp. 291–304.
   Google Scholar
• R. Bhatnagar, Pentametron, 2012. Available at http://pentametron.com, accessed 9 December 2015.
   Google Scholar
• O. Bown, Player responses to a live algorithm: Conceptualising computational creativity without recourse to human comparisons? in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity, H. Toivonen, ed., Brigham Young University, Park City, Utah, 2015, pp. 126–133.
   Google Scholar
• J. Carpenter, Public override void, 2004. Available at https://slought.org/resources/public_override_void, accessed 9 December 2015.
   Google Scholar
• J. Carpenter, etc4, 2007, blog post. Available at http://theprostheticimagination.blogspot.ca/2007/07/etc4.html.
   Google Scholar
• S. Colton, J. Goodwin, and T. Veale, Full face poetry generation, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Creativity, M.L. Maher, ed., computationalcreativity.net, Dublin, Ireland, 2012, pp. 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• P. Dahlstedt, Between material and ideas: A process-based spatial model of artistic creativity, in Computers and Creativity, J. McCormack and M. d'Inverno, eds., Springer, Berlin, 2012, pp. 205–233.
   Google Scholar
• J. Douglass, Numeracy and electronic poetry, J. Math. Arts 8 (2014), pp. 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• A. Eigenfeldt, Generative music for live musicians: An unnatural selection, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity, H. Toivonen, ed., Brigham Young University, Park City, Utah, 2015, pp. 142–149.
   Google Scholar
• E. Addad, A.T. Donovan, E. Elshtain, eRoGK7, C. Hardy, illiterate1, JYNX, Nossidge, N.K. Smith, J. Wilberg, Gnoetry daily. Available at https://gnoetrydaily.wordpress.com, accessed 9 December 2015.
   Google Scholar
• C.T. Funkhouser, Prehistoric digital poetry: An archaeology of forms, 1959-1995, University Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• C.T. Funkhouser, New directions in digital poetry, A&C Black, London, UK, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gervás, An expert system for the composition of formal Spanish poetry, Knowl.-Based Syst. 14 (2001), pp. 181–188.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gervás, Exploring quantitative evaluations of the creativity of automatic poets, in Workshop on Creative Systems, Approaches to Creativity in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, F. van Harmelen, ed., IOS Press, Lyon, France, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gervás, Evolutionary elaboration of daily news as a poetic stanza, in Proceedings of the IX Congreso Español de Metaheurísticas, Algoritmos Evolutivos y Bioinspirados-MAEB, F. Herrera and J.A. Gámez, eds., 2013, Salamanca, Spain, pp. 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gervás, Constrained creation of poetic forms during theme-driven exploration of a domain defined by an n-gram model, Connection Sci. 28 (2016), pp. 111–130.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ghazvininejad, X. Shi, Y. Choi, and K. Knight, Generating topical poetry, in Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, K. Duh and X. Carreras, eds., Association for Computational Linguistics, Austin, Texas, 2016, pp. 1183–1191.
   Google Scholar
• V.P. Glăveanu, Creativity as a sociocultural act, J. Creative Behav. 49 (2015), pp. 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• K. Goldsmith, Flarf is Dionysus. Conceptual Writing is Apollo, Poetry Foundation, Chicago, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• H. Gonçalo Oliveira, Tra-la-lyrics 2.0: Automatic generation of song lyrics on a semantic domain, J. Artif. Gen. Intell. 6 (2015), pp. 87–110.
   Google Scholar
• R. Goodwin, Adventures in narrated reality, 2016. Available at https://medium.com/artists-and-machine-intelligence/adventures-in-narrated-reality-6516ff395ba3, retrieved 29 November 2016.
   Google Scholar
• N. Gordon, Unicorn believers don’t declare fatwas, Poetry Foundation, Chicago, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• J. Harris, Times haiku: Serendipitous poetry from the New York Times, 2013-present. Available at http://haiku.nytimes.com/, accessed 9 December 2015.
   Google Scholar
• J. He, M. Zhou, and L. Jiang, Generating Chinese classical poems with statistical machine translation models, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, J. Hoffmann and B. Selman, eds., AAAI Publications, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• E. Heep and A. Kapur, Extracting visual information to generate sonic art installation and performance, in Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Electronic Art, P. Pasquier and T. Schiphorst, eds., Vancouver, Canada, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• A. Jordanous, Four PPPPerspectives on computational creativity, in The AISB15's 2nd International Symposium on Computational Creativity (CC2015), M.M. al-Rifaie and J. Gow, eds., Society for the Study for Artificial Inteligence, Bath, UK, 2015, p. 16.
   Google Scholar
• A. Kantosalo, J.M. Toivanen, P. Xiao, and H. Toivonen, From isolation to involvement: Adapting machine creativity software to support human-computer co-creation, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computational Creativity, S. Colton, D. Ventura, N. Lavrac, and M. Cook, eds., Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Canada, computationalcreativity.net, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2014, pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• A. Karpathy, The unreasonable effectiveness of recurrent neural networks (2015), qtd. in (Goodwin, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Kaufman and J. Baer, Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Res. J. 24 (2012), pp. 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• A. Knowles and J. Tenney, A sheet from ‘The House’, a computer poem (1968), qtd. in (Funkhouser, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• C.E. Lamb, D.G. Brown, and C.L. Clarke, Can human assistance improve a computational poet? in Proceedings of BRIDGES, K. Delp, ed., The Bridges Organization, Baltimore, Maryland, 2015, pp. 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• A. Lingentfelter, Personal communication, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• T. Lutz, Stochastiche texte, Augenblick 4 (1959), pp. 3–9, qtd. in (Roque, 2011); translated to English by Helen MacCormack, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• E. Malmi, P. Takala, H. Toivonen, T. Raiko, and A. Gionis, DopeLearning: a computational approach to rap lyrics generation, preprint (2015). Available at arXiv:1505.04771.
   Google Scholar
• H. Manurung, G. Ritchie, and H. Thompson, Towards a computational model of poetry generation, Tech. Rep., The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• H.M. Manurung, Chart generation of rhythm-patterned text, in Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Literature in Cognition and Computers, 1999, pp. 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• R. Manurung, G. Ritchie, and H. Thompson, Using genetic algorithms to create meaningful poetic text, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 24 (2012), pp. 43–64.
   Google Scholar
• K. McDowell, Music, art & machine intelligence 2016 conference proceedings, 2016. Available at https://medium.com/artists-and-machine-intelligence/music-art-machine-intelligence-2016-conference-proceedings-ea376a4e2576, retrieved 2 December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• N. Montfort and S. Strickland, Sea and spar between, Dear Navigator 2, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mordvintsev, C. Olah, and M. Tyka, Inceptionism: going deeper into neural networks, Google Res. Blog 20 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• J. Morris, Haiku—at random (1973), qtd. in (Funkhouser, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Y. Netzer, D. Gabay, Y. Goldberg, and M. Elhadad, Gaiku: generating haiku with word associations norms, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Linguistic Creativity, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009, pp. 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• S. Opolka, P. Obermeier, and T. Schaub, Automatic genre-dependent composition using answer set programming, in Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Electronic Art, P. Pasquier and T. Schiphorst, eds., Vancouver, Canada, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• F. Pachet and P. Roy, Markov constraints: Steerable generation of Markov sequences, Constraints 16 (2011), pp. 148–172.
   Google Scholar
• F. Pachet, P. Roy, J. Moreira, and M. d’Inverno, Reflexive loopers for solo musical improvisation, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, P. Baudisch and M. Beaudouin-Lafon, eds., ACM, Paris, France, 2013, pp. 2205–2208.
   Google Scholar
• A. Papadopoulos, P. Roy, and F. Pachet, Assisted lead sheet composition using flowcomposer, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, Springer, 2016, pp. 769–785.
   Google Scholar
• G. Percival, S. Fukayama, and M. Goto, Song2Quartet: A system for generating string quartet cover songs from polyphonic audio of popular music, in Proceedings of the 16th ISMIR Conference, The International Society of Music Information Retrieval, 2015, pp. 114–120.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ramakrishnan and S.L. Devi, An alternate approach towards meaningful lyric generation in Tamil, in Proceedings of the NAACL HLT Second Workshop on Computational Approaches to Linguistic Creativity, J. Burnstein, M. Harper, and G. Penn, eds., Association for Computational Linguistics, Los Angeles, CA, 2010, pp. 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• M. Rhodes, An analysis of creativity, Phi Delta Kappan 42 (1961), pp. 305–310.
   Google Scholar
• A. Roque, Language technology enables a poetics of interactive generation, J. Electr. Publ. 14 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• E. Sadler-Smith, Wallas’ four-stage model of the creative process: More than meets the eye? Creativity Res. J. 27 (2015), pp. 342–352.
   Google Scholar
• M. Scirea, P. Eklund, and J. Togelius, Toward a context sensitive music generator for affective state expression, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity, H. Toivonen, ed., late-breaking abstract, Brigham Young University, Association for Computational Creativity, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• V.W. Soo, T.Y. Lai, K.J. Wu, and Y.P. Hsu, Generate modern style Chinese poems based on common sense and evolutionary computation, in Proceedings of the Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (TAAI), C.K. Ting, S.J. Yen, Y.G. Wu, M.F. Horng, and C.L. Chen, eds., IEEE, Taiwan, ROC, 2015, pp. 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• C. Stross, Lovecraft.pl (2013), blog post. Available at http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2013/12/lovebiblepl.html, accessed 21 December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• J. Toivanen, H. Toivonen, A. Valitutti, and O. Gross, Corpus-based generation of content and form in poetry, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Creativity, M.L. Maher, ed., computationalcreativity.net, Dublin, Ireland, 2012, pp. 175–179.
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Toivanen, O. Gross, and H. Toivonen, The officer is taller than you, who race yourself! Using document specific word associations in poetry generation, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computational Creativity, computationalcreativity.net, 2014, pp. 355–359.
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Toivanen, M. Järvisalo, and H. Toivonen, Harnessing constraint programming for poetry composition, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Creativity, M.L. Maher, ed., computationalcreativity.net, Sydney, Australia, 2013, pp. 160–167.
   Google Scholar
• University of Helsinki Computer Science Department, Works of artistic nature. Available at https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/discovery/works-artistic-nature, accessed 6 December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• T. Veale and Y. Hao, Exploiting readymades in linguistic creativity: A system demonstration of the jigsaw bard, in Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Systems Demonstrations, D. Lin, ed., Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Oregon, 2011, pp. 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• D. Ventura, Mere generation: Essential barometer or dated concept? in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Creativity, F. Pachet, A. Cardoso, V. Corruble, and F. Ghedini, eds., Sony CSL, Paris, 2016, pp. 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Q. Wang, T. Luo, D. Wang, and C. Xing, Chinese song iambics generation with neural attention-based model, preprint (2016). Available at arXiv:1604.06274.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Wang, W. He, H. Wu, H. Wu, W. Li, H. Wang, and E. Chen, Chinese poetry generation with planning based neural network, preprint (2016). Available at arXiv:1610.09889.
   Google Scholar
• T.B. Ward, S.M. Smith, and R.A. Finke, Creative cognition, in Handbook of Creativity, R.J. Sternberg, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, pp. 189–212.
   Google Scholar
• R. Yan, i, Poet: Automatic poetry composition through recurrent neural networks with iterative polishing schema, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, S. Kambhampati, ed., AAAI Press, New York, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• R. Yan, H. Jiang, M. Lapata, S.D. Lin, X. Lv, and X. Li, i, Poet: Aautomatic Chinese poetry composition through a generative summarization framework under constrained optimization, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, F. Rossi, ed., AAAI Press, Beijing, China, 2013, pp. 2197–2203.
   Google Scholar
• V. Zappi and A. McPherson, The D-Box: How to rethink a digital musical instrument, in Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Electronic Art, P. Pasquier and T. Schiphorst, eds., Vancouver, Canada, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• M.H. Zareei, D.A. Carnegie, and A. Kapur, Noise square: Physical sonification of cellular automata through mechatronic sound-sculpture, in Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Electronic Art, P. Pasquier and T. Schiphorst, eds., Vancouver, Canada, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• X. Zhang and M. Lapata, Chinese poetry generation with recurrent neural networks, in Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, A. Moschitti, B. Pang, and W. Daelemans, eds., Association for Computational Linguistics, Doha, Qatar, 2014, pp. 670–680.
   Google Scholar