Local sensitivity of per-recruit fishing mortality reference points

References

• C. Bordet and L.-P. Rivest, A stochastic pella tomlinson model and its maximum sustainable yield, J. Theoret. Biol. 360 (2014), pp. 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• J. Brodziak, J. Ianelli, K. Lorenzen, and R. Methot, Estimating natural mortality in stock assessment applications, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO 119, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• E.N. Brooks, Effects of variable reproductive potential on reference points for fisheries management, Fish. Res. 138 (2013), pp. 152–158.
   Google Scholar
• D.G. Cacuci, M. Ionescu-Bujor, and I.M. Navon, Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Volume II: Applications to Large-scale Systems, Vol. 2, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• N.G. Cadigan, Sensitivity of common estimators of management parameters derived from stock–recruit relationships, Fish. Res. 96 (2009), pp. 195–205.
   Google Scholar
• N.G. Cadigan, Fitting a non-parametric stock–recruitment model in R that is useful for deriving MSY reference points and accounting for model uncertainty, ICES J. Mar. Sci. 70 (2013), pp. 56–67.
   Google Scholar
• N. Calduch-Verdiell, B.R. MacKenzie, J.W. Vaupel, K.H. Andersen, and Y. Chen, A life-history evaluation of the impact of maternal effects on recruitment and fisheries reference points, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 71 (2014), pp. 1113–1120.
   Google Scholar
• W.G. Clark, Groundfish exploitation rates based on life history parameters, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48 (1991), pp. 734–750.
   Google Scholar
• W.G. Clark, The effect of recruitment variability on the choice of a target level of spawning biomass per recruit, Proceedings of the international symposium on management strategies for exploited fish populations. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Report (93–02), 1993, pp. 233–246.
   Google Scholar
• M.E. Colvin, P.W. Bettoli, and G.D. Scholten, Predicting paddlefish roe yields using an extension of the Beverton–Holt equilibrium yield-per-recruit model, N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 33 (2013), pp. 940–949.
   Google Scholar
• R.D. Cook, Assessment of local influence, J. Royal. Stat. Soc. B (1986), pp. 133–169.
   Google Scholar
• C.-O. Ewald and W.-K. Wang, Sustainable yields in fisheries: Uncertainty, risk-aversion, and mean–variance analysis, Nat. Resour. Model. 23 (2010), pp. 303–323.
   Google Scholar
• W.L. Gabriel and P.M. Mace, A review of biological reference points in the context of the precautionary approach, in Proceedings of the fifth national NMFS stock assessment workshop: Providing scientific advice to implement the precautionary approach under the Magnuson–Stevens fishery conservation and management act. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-F/SPO-40, 1999, pp. 34–45.
   Google Scholar
• C.M. Gallagher, R.W. Hannah, and G. Sylvia, A comparison of yield per recruit and revenue per recruit models for the oregon ocean shrimp, pandalus jordani, fishery, Fish. Res. 66 (2004), pp. 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• H. Gislason, N. Daan, J.C. Rice, and J.G. Pope, Size, growth, temperature and the natural mortality of marine fish, Fish Fish. 11 (2010), pp. 149–158.
   Google Scholar
• M.H Griffiths, Management of south african dusky kob argyrosomus japonicus (sciaenidae) based on per-recruit models, S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 18 (1997), pp. 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• N.M.A. Holmgren, N. Norrström, R. Aps, and S. Kuikka, MSY-orientated management of baltic sea herring (clupea harengus) during different ecosystem regimes, ICES J. Mar. Sci. 69 (2012), pp. 257–266.
   Google Scholar
• A.L. Jensen, Beverton and holt life history invariants result from optimal trade-off of reproduction and survival, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53 (1996), pp. 820–822.
   Google Scholar
• A.D. MacCall, Use of the delta method to evaluate the precision of assessments that fix parameter values, Fish. Res. 142 (2013), pp. 56–60.
   Google Scholar
• R.D. Methot and C.R. Wetzel, Stock synthesis: A biological and statistical framework for fish stock assessment and fishery management, Fish. Res. 142 (2013), pp. 86–99.
   Google Scholar
• D. Pelletier and P. Gros, Assessing the impact of sampling error on model-based management advice: comparison of equilibrium yield per recruit variance estimators, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48 (1991), pp. 2129–2139.
   Google Scholar
• J.J. Polovina, Climate variation, regime shifts, and implications for sustainable fisheries, Bull. Mar. Sci. 76 (2005), pp. 233–244.
   Google Scholar
• T.J. Quinn and R.B. Deriso, Quantitative Fish Fynamics, Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• L.J. Richards and J.-J. Maguire, Recent international agreements and the precautionary approach: new directions for fisheries management science, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55 (1998), pp. 1545–1552.
   Google Scholar
• A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, and S. Tarantola, Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• P.A. Shelton and A.F. Sinclair, It's time to sharpen our definition of sustainable fisheries management, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 65 (2008), pp. 2305–2314.
   Google Scholar
• C. Ulrich and P. Marchal, Sensitivity of some biological reference points to shifts in exploitation patterns and inputs uncertainty for three north sea demersal stocks, Fish. Res. 58 (2002), pp. 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• E.H. Williams and K.W. Shertzer, Implications of life-history invariants for biological reference points used in fishery management, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 60 (2003), pp. 710–720.
   Google Scholar