The competition model with Holling type II competitive response to interfering time

References

• V. Ajraldi, M. Pittavino, and E. Venturino, Modeling herd behavior in population systems, Nonlinear Real-Anal. 12(4) (2011), pp. 2319–2338. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Amarasekare, Interference competition and species coexistence, P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 269(1509) (2002), pp. 2541–2550. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Amarasekare, Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: A synthesis, Ecol. Lett.6 (2003), pp. 1109–1122. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00530.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.K. Arrowsmith, C.M. Place, Dynamical System: Differential Equations, Maps and Chaotic Behavior. 1st ed.Chapman Hall/CRC Mathematics Series, London, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• F.J. Ayala, M.E. Gilpin, and J.G. Ehrenfeld, Competition between species: Theoretical models and experimental tests, Theor. Popul. Biol. 4(3) (1973), pp. 331–356. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(73)90014-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.E. Barton, Natan J. Sanders, and D.M. Gordon, The effects of proximity and colony age on interspecific interference competition between the desert ants pogonomyrmex barbatus and aphaenogaster cockerelli, Amer. Midl. Naturalist. 180(1) (2009), pp. 376–382.
   Google Scholar
• J.R. Beddington, Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency, J. Anim. Ecol. 44 (1975), pp. 331–340. doi: 10.2307/3866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Bravo de la Parra, M. Marvá, E. Sánchezet al., Discrete models of disease and competition. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. (2017), article id 5310837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Castillo-Alvino, (2019). Available at https://github.com/hcastilloa/code.
   Google Scholar
• P. Chesson, Mechamisms of maintenance of species diversity, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31(3) (2000), pp. 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• P.H. Crowley and E.K. Martin, Functional responses and interference within and between year classes of a dragonfly population, J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 8(3) (1989), pp. 211–221. doi: 10.2307/1467324
   Google Scholar
• D.L. De Angelis, R.A. Goldstein, and R.V. O'Neill, A model for trophic interaction, Ecology 56 (1975), pp. 881–892. doi: 10.2307/1936298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.F. Gause, The Struggle for Existence. Dover Books on Biology, Hafner, Baltimore, New York, 1934.
   Google Scholar
• W.M. Getz, Population dynamics: a per capita resource approach, J. Theor. Biol. 108 (1984), pp. 623–643. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(84)80082-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Hardin, The competitive exclusion principle, Science 131(3409) (1960), pp. 1292–1297. doi: 10.1126/science.131.3409.1292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hatcher and M.A.M. Dunn, Parasites in Ecological Communities From Interactions to Ecosystems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• C.S. Holling, Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism, Can. Entomol. 91(7) (1959), p. 385. doi: 10.4039/Ent91385-7
   Google Scholar
• C.S. Holling, The component of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly, Can. Entomol. 91(5) (1959), pp. 293–320. doi: 10.4039/Ent91293-5
   Google Scholar
• H. Jiang and T.D. Rogers, The discrete dynamics of symmetrical competition on the plane, J. Math. Biol. 25(6) (1987), pp. 573–596. doi: 10.1007/BF00275495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Lawton and M.P. Hassell, Asymmetrical competition in insects, Nature 289 (1981), pp. 793–795. doi: 10.1038/289793a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Levins, Evolution in Changing Environments, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• S.A. Levin, Community equilibria and stability, and an extension of the competitive exclusion principle, Amer. Natur. 104(939) (1970), pp. 413–423. doi: 10.1086/282676
   Google Scholar
• A.J. Lotka, Elements of Physical Biology, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1925.
   Google Scholar
• R.H. MacArthur, Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests, Ecology 39 (1958), pp. 599–619. doi: 10.2307/1931600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Marvá and R. Bravo de la Parra, Coexistence and superior competitor exclusion in the Leslie-Gower competition model with fast dispersal, Ecol. Model. 306 (2015), pp. 247–256. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Marvá, A. Moussaoui, R. Bravo de la Parra, and P. Auger, A density dependent model describing age structured population dynamics using hawk-dove tactics, J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 19(6) (2013), pp. 1022–1034. doi: 10.1080/10236198.2012.707195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Melchionda, E. Pastacaldi, and C. Perri, Social behavior-induced multistability in minimal competitive ecosystems, J. Theor. Biol. 439 (2018), pp. 24–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Moussaoui, P. Auger, and B. Roche, Effect of Hawk-Dove game on the dynamics of two competing species, Acta Biotheor. 62(3) (2014), pp. 385–404. doi: 10.1007/s10441-014-9224-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Nguyen Ngoc, R. Bravo de la Parra, M.A. Zavala, and P. Auger, Competition and species coexistence in a metapopulation model: Can fast asymmetric migration reverse the outcome of competition in a homogeneous environment, J. Theo. Biol. 266 (2010), pp. 256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.06.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Nunney, Density compensation, isocline shape and single-level competition models, J. Theor. Biol.86 (1980), pp. 323–349. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(80)90010-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.W. Schoener, Effects of density-restricted food encounter some single-level competition models, Theor. Popul. Biol. 13 (1997), pp. 365–381. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90052-7
   Google Scholar
• G.T. Skalski and J.F. Gilliam, Functional responses with predator interference: Viable alternatives to the Holling Type II model, Ecology 82(11) (2001), pp. 3083–3092. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3083:FRWPIV]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ritchie, Competition and coexistence of mobile animals, in Competition and Coexistence, U. Sommer and B. Worm, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002, pp. 109–131.
   Google Scholar
• S.B. Teleky, Multiple interactions: an empirically suggested model, Theor. Popul. Biol. 22 (1982), pp. 28–42. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(82)90034-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Volterra, Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi, Mem. R. Accad. Naz. dei Lincei 2 (1926), pp. 31–113.
   Google Scholar
• J.B. Wilson, Mechanisms of species coexistence: twelve explanations for Hutchinson's “paradox of the plankton”: Evidence from New Zealand plant communities, N. Z. J. Ecol. 13 (1990), pp. 17–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.J. Wright, Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence, Oecologia130 (2002), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s004420100809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Zhang, Mututalism or cooperation among competitors promotes coexistence and competitive ability, Ecol. Model. 164 (2003), pp. 271–282. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00069-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zu, W. Wang, Y. Takeuchi, B. Zu, and K. Wang, On evolution under symmetric and asymmetric competitions, J. Theo. Biol. 254 (2008), pp. 239–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar