Private food standards, trade and institutions in Vietnam

References

• Bretton Woods Project, 2001. More WTO-WB-IMF cooperation on trade (Bretton Woods Update No. 25). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, D.W., 2006. Sufficient reason: volitional pragmatism and the meaning of economic institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., Nguyen, H.V., and Nguyen, H.H., 2008. Extending export opportunities to smallplot dragonfruit growers through good agricultural practices. Tien Giang: Southern Fruit Research Institute, Horticulture Research Client Report No. 26264.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, D., 2009. Three puzzles of private governance: GlobalGAP and the regulation of food safety and quality. UCD Working Papers in Law, Criminology & Socio-Legal Studies Research Paper No. 22/2009, University College Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. and Keane, J., 2008. A review of ethical standards and labels: is there a gap in the market for a new ‘good for development’ label? ODI Working Paper number 115, November. London: ODI.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, 2008. Opportunities for reduction of GlobalGAP compliance cost to enhance small-scale producer competitiveness — the case of Kenya. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, 2009. The impacts of private food safety standards on the food chain and on public standard-setting processes. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, H. and McMichael, P., 1989. Agriculture and the state system: the rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the present. Sociologia Ruralis, 29 (2), 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G., 1995. Global production systems and third world development. In: B. Stallings, ed. Global change, regional response: the new international context of development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G. and Lee, J., 2009. A global value chain approach to food safety and quality standards. Working Paper Series, Global Health Diplomacy for Chronic Disease Prevention, WHO, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Germann, J., 2009. The human right to food. In: Y. Atasoy, ed. Hegemonic transitions, the state and crisis in neoliberal capitalism. Routledge: Abingdon, 126–143.
   Google Scholar
• Graffham, A., Karehu, E., and Macgregor, J., 2006. Impact of EurepGAP on small-scale vegetable growers in Kenya. In: Fresh perspectives. London: DFID, IIED and the NRI.
   Google Scholar
• Graffham, A. and Macgregor, J., 2006. Impact of EurepGAP on small-scale vegetable growers in Zambia. In: Fresh perspectives. London: DFID, IIED and the NRI.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M., 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), 481–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R., 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., and Busch, L., 2005. Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy, 30 (3), 354–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayton, B., 2010. Vietnam: rising dragon. Padstow: TJ International.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, S. and Jaffee, S., 2006. Food safety standards and trade: enhancing competitiveness and avoiding exclusion of developing countries. European Journal of Development Research, 18 (4), 593–621.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, M. and Coe, N.M., 2006. Making connections: global production networks, standards, and embeddedness in the mobile-telecommunications industry. Environment and Planning A, 38 (7), 1205–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, J., 2008. Private standards, small farmers and donor policy: EUREPGAP in Kenya. Working Paper Series, No. 308. Brighton: Institute for Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, P.V., 2006. Fragmentation and economies of size in multi-plot farms in Vietnam. Sydney: Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• IIED NRI and DFID, 2008. Small-scale producers and standards in agrifood supply chains: key findings and policy recommendations. London: IIED.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffee, S., 2003. From challenge to opportunity: transforming Kenya’s fresh vegetable trade in the context of emerging food safety and other standards in Europe. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffee, S. and Henson, S., 2004. Standards and agro-food exports from developing countries: rebalancing the debate [online]. SSRN eLibrary. Available from: http://ssrn.com/paper=610392 [Accessed 8 June 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Jaffee, S. and Henson, S., 2005. Agro-food exports from developing countries: the challenges posed by standards. In: M. Aksoy and J. Beghin, eds. Global agricultural trade and developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffee, S. and Masakure, O., 2005. Strategic use of private standards to enhance international competitiveness: vegetable exports from Kenya and elsewhere. Food Policy, 30 (3), 316–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G., 2006. Private food standards and their impacts on developing countries. Brussels: European Commission, DG Trade Unit G2.
   Google Scholar
• Lockie, S., et al., 2013. Private food standards as responsive regulation: the role of national legislation in the implementation and evolution of GLOBALG.A.P. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Maertens, M. and Swinnen, J.F.M., 2006. Standards as barriers and catalysts for trade and poverty reduction. In: IAAE conference papers: 26th conference of the international association of agricultural economists, 12–18 August, IAAE, Queensland. Milwaukee, WI: IAAE, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Maertens, M. and Swinnen, J.F.M., 2009. Trade, standards, and poverty: evidence from Senegal. World Development, 37 (1), 161–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARD (Ministry for Agriculture and Rural Development), 2005. The five year plan for the agricultural and rural development sector, period 2006–2010. Hanoi: MARD.
   Google Scholar
• MARD (Ministry for Agriculture and Rural Development), 2008. Institutional Vision for MARD in 2020. Hanoi: MARD.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, S.P., MacAulay, T.G., and Hung, P.V., 2006. Agricultural development and land policy in Vietnam: ACIAR Monograph No. 123. Canberra: ACIAR.
   Google Scholar
• Mausch, K., et al., 2006. Impact of EurepGAP standard in Kenya: comparing smallholders to large-scale vegetable producers. In: Paper read at conference on international agricultural research for development, at University of Bonn, 11–13 October 2006, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, N. and Ota, M., 2002. Export horticulture and poverty in Kenya. IDS Working Paper 174. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S., 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, J. and Pritchard, B., 2009. Value chain struggles: institutions and governance in the plantation districts of South India. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• North, D., 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D., 1993. The new institutional economics and development. Washington, DC: Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Ouma, S., 2010. Global standards, local realities: private agrifood governance and the restructuring of the Kenyan horticulture industry. Economic Geography, 86 (2), 197–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin, M. and Russell, I., 2005. Building sustainable farmer cooperatives in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: is social capital the key? [online]. Available from: http://www.engagingcommunities2005.org/abstracts/Rankin-Marlo-final.pdf [Accessed 12 July 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Seibel, H., Giehler, T., and Karduck, S., 2005. Reforming agricultural development banks. Eschborn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).
   Google Scholar
• Tennent, R. and Lockie, S., 2012. Production relations under GLOBALG.A.P: the relative influence of standards and retail market structure. Sociologia Ruralis, 52 (1), 31–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen, L., 2007. Accessing global value chains? The role of business–state relations in the private clothing industry in Vietnam. Journal of Economic Geography, 7 (6), 753–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNCTAD, 2007. Challenges and opportunities arising from private standards on food safety and environment for exporters of fresh fruit and vegetables in Asia: experiences of Malaysia, Thailand and Viet Nam. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2007/6. Geneva: UNCTAD.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD, 2008. Private sector standards and national schemes for good agricultural practices, implications for exports of fresh fruit and vegetables from sub-Saharan Africa: experiences of Ghana, Kenya and Uganda. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2007/13. Geneva: UNCTAD.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergeest, P., 2007. Certification and communities: alternatives for regulating the environmental and social impacts of shrimp farming. World Development, 35 (7), 1152–1171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiboonpongse, A. and Sriboonchitta, S., 2004. Securing small producer participation in restructured national and regional agri-food systems in Thailand. In: IIED regoverning markets program. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, 2005. Food safety and agricultural health standards: challenges and opportunities for developing country exports. Washington, DC: Poverty Reduction & Economic Management Trade Unit and Agriculture and Rural Development Department, World Bank.
   Google Scholar