Do the poor count in fiscal decentralization policy? A comparative analysis of the general grant allocation systems in Indonesia and Thailand

References

• Acosta, P., Phillipe, L., and Jamele, R. 2011. Should cash transfers be confined to the poor?: implications for poverty and inequality in Latin America. World Bank. Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0. Available from: http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-5875.
   Google Scholar
• Alfonso, R. and Hauter, R., 2006. Four years of regional autonomy, successes, and problems. In: N. Eschborn, S. Hackel, and J.H. Richardson, eds. Indonesia today: problems and perspectives. Jakarta, Indonesia: Konrad Adenauer Foundation, 123–145.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., 2007. Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. International Journal of the Commons, 2 (1), 7–32. doi:10.18352/ijc.28
   Google Scholar
• Baretti, C., Huber, B., and Lichtblau, K., 2002. The incentive effects of equalizing transfers: evidence from Germany. International Tax and Public Finance, 9 (6), 631–649. doi:10.1023/A:1020925812428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., 2009. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations, and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (5), 1692–1702. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, J., 2007. Indonesia’s quasi-federalist approach: accommodation amid strong integrationist tendencies. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5, 576–605. doi:10.1093/icon/mom029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjornestad, L., 2009. Fiscal decentralization, fiscal incentives, and pro-poor outcomes: evidence from Vietnam. Manila, The Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Boadway, R.W. and Shah, A., 2007. Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: principles and practice. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Boex, J. and Martinez-Vazquez, J., 2004. Designing intergovernmental equalization transfers with imperfect data: concepts, practices, and lessons. Atlanta, Georgia: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Brodjonegoro, B. 2002Fiscal decentralization in Indonesia. In: H. Susastro, A.L. Smith and M. Ling Han eds. Governance in Indonesia: Challenges Facing the Megawati Presidency, 39–56. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bronic, M., 2010. Evaluating the current equalization grant in counties in Croatia. Financial Theory and Practice, 34 (1), 25–52.
   Google Scholar
• Casson, A. and Obidzinski, K., 2002. From new order to regional autonomy: shifting dynamics of ‘illegal’ logging in Kalimantan, Indonesia. World Development, 30 (12), 2133–2151. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00125-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrazzi, G., 2005. Obligatory functions and minimum service standards for Indonesian Regional Government: searching for a model. Journal of Public Administration and Development, 25, 227–238. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-162X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiori, S., 2002. Alternative visions of change in Douglas North’s New Institutionalism. Journal of Economic Issues, 36 (4), 1025–1043. doi:10.1080/00213624.2002.11506534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzen, S., 2006. Probing system limits: decentralisation and local political accountability in Vietnam. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 28 (1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/23276665.2006.10779312
   Google Scholar
• Galvan, D.C., 2004. The state must be our master of fire: how peasants craft sustainable development in Senegal. Berkely, California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haldeda, N., Brahimi, F., and Merkaj, E., 2013. Local government borrowing issues in Central and Eastern Europe: the Case of Albenia. EuroEconomica, 1 (32), 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C., 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44 (5), 936–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero-Alcalde, A., Martinez-Vazquez, J., and Murillo, E., 2011. The challenge of designing capital equalization transfers: an application to Spanish regions. Publius: the Journal of Federalism, 42 (2), 260–288. doi:10.1093/publius/pjr034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, B. and Guerra, S.C., 2007. Ensuring inter-regional equity and poverty reduction. In: J. Martinez-Vazquez and B. Searle, eds. Challenges in the design of intergovernmental transfers. New York,NY: Springer, 31–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, B., Kadjatmiko, K.K., and Suharnoko Sjahrir, B. Evaluating fiscal equalization in Indonesia. Policy Research Working Paper No. 3911, Washington, DC: World Bank, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, B. and Kaiser, K., 2004. The making of the “Big Bang” and its aftermath: a political economy perspective. In: J. Alm, J. Martinez-Vasquez, and S.M. Indrawati, eds. Reforming intergovernmental fiscal relations and the rebuilding of Indonesia: the “Big Bang” program and its economic consequences. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 15–46.
   Google Scholar
• Inman, R.P. and Rubinfeld, D.L., 1997. Rethinking federalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 43–64. doi:10.1257/jep.11.4.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewiet, D.R. and McCubbins, M.D., 1991. The logic of delegation: congressional parties and the appropriateness process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.H. and Smoke, P., 2003. The role and challenges of intergovernmental transfers in Asia. In: P. Smoke and Y.H. Kim, eds. Intergovernmental fiscal transfers in Asia: current practice and challenges for the future. Manila, The Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B.D., 2003. Property tax in Indonesia: measuring and explaining administrative (under-) performance. Public Administration and Development, 23, 227–239. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-162X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, B., 2002. Distributive politics and the costs of centralization. Review of Economic Studies, 69 (2), 313–337. doi:10.1111/roes.2002.69.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., 2014. Varieties of Governance in China: migration and institutional change. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Vazquez, J. and Timofeev, A., 2016. Capital infrastructure and equity objectives. In: J. Frank and J. Martinez-Vazquez, eds. Decentralization and infrastructure in the global economy: from gaps to solutions. New York, NY: Routledge, 180–215.
   Google Scholar
• McLure, C.E., 1995. Revenue assignment and intergovernmental fiscal relations in Russia. In: E. Lazear, ed. Economic reform in Eastern Europe and Russia: realities of reform. Palo Alto, California: Hoover Institution Press, 199–246.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, C. and Pfau, W.D., 2012. Simulating the impacts of cash transfers on poverty and school attendance: the case of Cambodia. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33, 436–452. doi:10.1007/s10834-012-9292-5
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H.-P., 2008. What’s in it for the poor? Evidence from fiscal decentralization in Vietnam. Syracuse, NY: Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University.
   Google Scholar
• North, D.C., 1991. Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 97–112. doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W., 1972. Fiscal federalism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jonavich.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W.E., 2005. Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12 (4), 349–373. doi:10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patamasiriwat, D., 2012. Fiscal inequality and grant allocation: provincial analysis of Thailand’s local government finance. In: P. Kamnuansilpa and B. Pacala Brereton, eds. In local governments in a global context. Khon Kaen, Thailand: College of Local Administration, Khon Kaen University, 91–116.
   Google Scholar
• Pelling, M. and High, C., 2005. Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Global Environmental Change, 15 (4), 308–319. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, A., 2006. Institutions and development: a conceptual reanalysis. Population and Development Review, 32 (2), 233–262. doi:10.1111/padr.2006.32.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland, G., 2004. Understanding institutional change: fast-moving and slow-moving institutions. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38 (4), 109–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinfeld, D., 1987. Economics of the local public sector. In: A.J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, eds. Handbook of public economics. New York, NY: Elsevier, 571–646.
   Google Scholar
• Seabright, P., 1996. Accountability and decentralisation in government: an incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40, 61–89. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(95)00055-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorens, J., 2014. Fiscal federalism, jurisdictional competition, and the size of government. Constitutional Political Economy, 25 (4), 354–375. doi:10.1007/s10602-014-9164-0
   Google Scholar
• Stein, E.T. and Grisanti, A., 1997. Institutional arrangements and fiscal performance: the Latin American experience. Paper Presented at the Conference on Budgeting Institutions and Fiscal Performance: Perspectives for EMU, Bonn, Switzerland, 27–29 June 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Sudhipongpracha, T. and Wongpredee, A., 2015. Disequalizing equalization grant: an assessment of the relationship between equalization grant and local fiscal capacity in Northeast Thailand. Asian Affairs: an American Review, 42 (1), 1–21. doi:10.1080/00927678.2015.999515
   Google Scholar
• Sudhipongpracha, T. and Wongpreedee, A., 2016. Fiscal decentralization in comparative perspective: analysis of the intergovernmental grant systems in Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Comparative Public Policy: Research and Practice. doi:10.1080/13876988.2016.1138659.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, C., 2010. Theories of performance: organizational and service improvement in the public domain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thiessen, U., 2003. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in high-income OECD countries. Fiscal Studies, 24 (3), 237–274. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00084.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchimura, H., 2012. Fiscal decentralization and development: experiences of three developing countries in Southeast Asia. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Usui, N., 2004. Indonesia’s new block grant transfer: its equalization performance and remaining challenges. Review of Economics (Kansai University), 6, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vatn, A., 2006. Institutions and the environment. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingast, B.R., 2014. Second generation fiscal federalism: political aspects of decentralization and economic development. World Development, 53 (1), 14–25. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildasin, D.E., 2004. The institutions of federalism: toward an analytical framework. National Tax Journal, 57, 247–272. doi:10.17310/ntj.2004.2.00
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongpreedee, A., 2007. Decentralization and its effects on provincial political power in Thailand. Asia and African Studies Series, 6 (2), 454–470.
   Google Scholar