Public policy on public-private project financing in Kazakhstan

References

• Ahola, T., Ruuska, I., Artto, K., & Kujala, J. (2014). What is project governance and what are its origins? International Journal Project Management, 32(8), 1321–1330. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amangeldy, S. (2014). National Bank of Kazakhstan to increase the minimum capital requirements. Halyk Finance Bulletin, 11(4), 1−2.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, J. W. (1989). The current state of the coherence theory (p. 44). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. E., Greve, C., & Hodge, G. A. (2015). Comparative analyses of infrastructure public-private partnerships. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(5), 441–447. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1052611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Liking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1–34. doi:10.2307/2393807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cave, A. (2017, February 17). How to get back a lost $1B: One bank’s tale in Europe’s biggest alleged fraud. Forbes. Retrieved July 10, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewcave/2017/02/06/how-to-get-back-a-lost-10bn-one-banks-tale-in-europes-biggest-alleged-fraud/#35f21e8216cd
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, A., & Chen, P.-H. (2010). Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) of public private partnership projects in Asia and Mediterranean Middle East: Trends and techniques. International Journal of Institutions and Economics, 2(4), 64−88.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, K. S., & Bukh, P. N. (2009). Knowledge management in projects: insights from two perspectives. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 3(3), 313–330.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, P., &  Yehoue, E.. B.  (2013). The Routeledge companion to the public-private partnerships. New York, NY: Routeledge, 1-164.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbs, R. O. (2013). Reverse the curse: Maximizing the potential of resource-driven economies (Report) (pp. 1−164). McKensey Global Institute. Chicago: McKinsey & Co, pp. 164.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2003). Guidelines for successful public-private partnerships (pp. 100). Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floricel, S., Bonneau, C., Aubry, M., & Sergi, V. (2014). Extending project management research: Insights from social theories. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1091–1107. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B, Holm, M.S., & Buhl, S. (2002). Understanding costs in public works projects: Error or Lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 279-295. doi:10.1080/01944360208976273
   Google Scholar
• Forelle, C. (2014, January 1). Billions vanish in Kazakhstan’s Banking Scandal (The Wall Street Journal. Asia Ed). Retrieved July 12, 2017, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/billions-vanish-in-kazakh-banking-scandal-1388632446
   Google Scholar
• Geraldi, J. (2008). The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: A conceptual model. International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 348–356. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.013
   Google Scholar
• GIH. (2016). Allocating risks in public-private partnership contracts (pp. 1−267). Melbourne: Global Infrastructure Hub Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, S. 2013. Efficiency and Effectiveness in Project Management. Amsterdam: IPMA. Retrieved September 29, 2017, from http://www.ipma.world/efficiency-and-effectiveness/
   Google Scholar
• Government Kazakhstan. 2016. Expanded Cabinet Meeting chaired by Head of State. Akorda Press. Retrieved November 9, 2016, from http://www.akorda.kz/ru/events/akorda_news/meetings_and_sittings/rasshirennoe-zasedanie-pravitelstva-pod-predsedatelstvom-glavy-gosudarstva
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Amos, B., & Plumptre, T. (2003). Principles for good governance in the 21st century (Policy Brief No. 15). Institute on Governance, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. K. (2005). Are public private partnerships value for money? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views. Accounting Forum, 29, 345–378. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2005.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Grimsey, D. L. (2004). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elga.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, K. (2009). Managing complex projects: A New model. Vienna: Management Concepts Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, O. (2003). Incomplete contracts and public ownership: Remarks, and an application to public–private partnerships. Economic Journal, 113, 69−76. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, D. W. (2010). How can the public sector resolve complex issues? Strategies for steering, administering and coping. Asia Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2(1), 8–16. doi:10.1108/17574321011028954
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B. (1991). Multi-task principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, VII, 24−56.
   Google Scholar
• Hueskes, M., Verhoest, K., & Block, T. (2017). Governing public-private partnerships for sustainability: An analysis of procurement and governance practices of PPP infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1184–1195. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernaghan, K. (1993). Reshaping the government: The post-bureaucratic paradigm. Canadian Journal of Public Administration, 36(4), 634–644.
   Google Scholar
• Klakegg, O. J., Williams, T., Magnussen, O. M., & Glasspool, H. (2008). Governance frameworks for public project development and estimation. Project Management Journal, 39, S27-S42. doi:10.1002/pmj.20058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klalegg, O. J., Williams, T., Magnussen, O. M. (2009). Governance frameworks for public project development and estimation. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Komekbaeva, L. S., & Bulekbayeva, G. K. (2016). Credit policy of the second-tier banks of Kazakhstan in condition of free floating of the national currency. Bulletin of Karaganda University, 2(82), 232.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, D. (2016). Public-Private and the Future of American Infrastructure. Erlangen, Germany: Siemens USA Newsroom.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. E., & Hobbs, B. (2005). Governance regimes for large complex projects. Project Management Journal, 36(3), 42-50.
   Google Scholar
• MOJ Kazakhstan. (2013). Law on Introducing Amendments and Modifications to Some Legal Acts on Issues of Implementing New Types of Public-Private Partnerships and Expanding the Areas of Application in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Astana: Adilet. Zan. Retrieved July 4, 2013, from http://www.adilet.kz
   Google Scholar
• MOJ Kazakhstan. (2014). Law on Introducing Amendments and Modifications to Some Legal Acts on Issues of Public Management of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Astana: Adilet. Zan. Retrieved July 2, 2014, from http://www.adilet.kz
   Google Scholar
• Nazarbayev, N. (2013). Akorda. Statement of 23 May 2013 by President of Republic of Kazakhstan at VI Astana Economic Forum. Astana: Akorda Press. Retrieved December 2, 2016, fromhttp://www.akorda.kz
   Google Scholar
• NBK. (2016). Monetary and policy guidelines of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2017 (NBK Resolution No. 271). Almaty: Author, 24 p.
   Google Scholar
• Nevvit, P. K., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2000). Project financing (7th ed., p. 498). London: Euromoney Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donovan, J., & Phillips, J. (2003). The modern contract of guarantee. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• OColverson, S., & Perera, O. (2012). Harnessing the power of public-private partnerships: The role of hybrid financing strategies in sustainable development (Policy Report). Geneva: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Onions, S. T. (2000). Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Retrieved September 27, 2017, from https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-dictionary-of-english-etymology
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J., Connor, J., Linger, H., McDermott, V., & Algeo, C. (2017). Developing Government Policy Capability: Policy Work. Project Management Institute, ISBN13:9781628251777, 193.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, O. (2010). Emerging meta-governance as a regulation framework for public-private partnerships: An examination of the European Union’s approach. International Public Management Review, 11(3), 1−21.
   Google Scholar
• PMI. (2013). The impact of PMOs on strategy implementation (In-depth Report). The PMI’s Pulse of the Profession, Nov. Issue (pp. 1−18). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (p. 207). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samset, K., Berg, P., & Klakegg, O.J. (2006, May). Front-end Governance of Major Public Projects, EURAM 2006. Proceedings of the European Academy of Management Conference (V.18). Oslo, Norway: Norwegian School of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Samset, K., & Volden, G. H. (2013). Investing for impact. Lessons with the Norwegian State project model and the first investment projects that have been subjected to external quality assurance. (Concept Report No. 36). Oslo, Norway: Ex Ante Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, R. (2015). The fourth model of institutional investment - The ‘Collaborative’ Model. Stanford Global Projects Center. Retrieved November 12, 2016, from https://gpc.stanford.edu/gpcthinks/fourth-model-institutional-investment
   Google Scholar
• Shvetsova, A. N., & Dubskaya, O. S. (2015). Public-private partnership as a form of interaction between the state and business in the context of theories of institutional change. Terra Economicus, 11(2), 153–156.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, R. (2011). Financier’s Perspective: Financial Operation and Risk Mitigation for BOT/PPP Projects for Infrastructure. Retrieved December 17, 2016, from http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/e4675d004a1ad38b9f809f02f96b8a3d/Financier%2527s%2BPerspective%2B110801_sinha.pdf?MOD=AJPERES/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. J. (1999). Privatized infrastructure: The role of Government (p. 245). London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Suhaiza, I. A. (2011). Systematic review of research on private finance initiative. International Journal of Economics, Management & Accounting, 2011(Supplementary Issue 19: 33–60), 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, M.  (2005).  Research questions in target costing in major Japanese enterprises. Accounting, 57 (2), 148-156.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, P., Derek, O., & Thomson, M. (2010). Do forecasts expressed as prediction intervals improve production planning decisions? European Journal of Operational Research, 205 (1), 195-201.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. R. (2006). Editorial: Towards a theory of project management: The nature of the project. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Tvarno, C., & Ostergaard, K. (2013). PPP vs PPPP. What is wrong in Denmark?Copenhagen Business School PPP Conference Paper. Vancouver, CA, 1-16. http://hdl.handle.net/10398/8738
   Google Scholar
• Tyrone, S., Pitsis, S., Shankaran, S. G., & Clegga, S. R. (2014). Governing projects under complexity: Theory and practice in project management. International Journal Project Management, 32(8), 1285–1290. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNECE. (2008). Practical Guide on PPPs. Practical guidance on the issues of effective management in the area of public-private partnerships. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• US Dep. Trans. (2012). Risk assessment for public-private partnerships: A Primer. F. H. Adm., Washington, DC:  US Dep. of Transportation. Federal Highway Authority, USA, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Valle, S., & Hammerschmid, G. (2011). The Impact of the new public management: Challenges for coordination and cohesion in European public sector (Review Essay). Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture, 12(2), 190–209.
   Google Scholar
• Varnavskii, V.V.  (2011). Public-Private Partnership: Theory and Practices. (In Rus. Gosudarstvenno- chastnoe partnerstvo: teoriya i praktika). International Economics and International Relations, 9, 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Vorotilov, A. (2013). Kazakhstan – World Champion on NPL. Kazahstan – Chempion mira po nevozvratnym kreditam. Forbes-Kazakhstan, 11(17). Retrieved September 1, 2016, from, https://forbes.kz/finances/markets/kazahstan_chempion_mira_po_nevozvratnyim_kreditam
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T., Klakegg, O.J., Magnussen, O.M, & Glasspool, H. (2010). An investigation of governance frameworks for public projects in Norway and the UK. International Journal of Project Management, 28(10), 40-50. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Yescombe, E. R. (2002). Principles of Project Finance (pp. 344). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yescombe, E. R. (2007). Public-private partnerships. Principles of policy and finance. London: YCL Consulting Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., Owen, J., & Connor, J. (2011). Whole of enterprise portfolio management: A case study of NSW Government and Sydney Water Corporation. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(3), 412–435. doi:10.1108/17538371111144157
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, J.-F., Skibniewski, M.J., Li, Q., & Shan, J. (2010). The driving factors of China’s public-private partnership projects in metropolitan transportation systems: Public sector’s viewpoint. Journal of Civil S Engineering and Management, 16(1), 5−18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar