Institutions, policies and diverse innovation systems: experiences from the US, Germany and South Korea

References

• Allen, M. (2015). National innovation system in Germany. New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Andes, B. (2010). Buying innovation: How public procurement can spur innovation. Washington, D.C.: The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation..
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. (1992). On the growth effects of import competition. NBER Working Paper, 40(9), 1784–1797.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A. (1983). Theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 3, 371–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper, S., Lehrer, M., & Soskice, D. (1999). Can high technology industries prosper in Germany? Institutional frameworks and the evolution of the German software and biotechnology industries. Industry and Innovation, 6(1), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H., Park, H., & Yoo, C. (1998). Interpreting the Korean crisis: Financial liberalization, industrial policy, and corporate governance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6, 735–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. (1999). The practice of German technological innovation and its implications to China. Science of Science and Technology Management, 3, 41-42. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J., & Lee, J. (2017). Repairing the R&D market failure: Public R&D subsidy and the composition of private R&D. Research Policy, 46(8), 1465–1478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, S. (2015). Networks of institutions: Institutional emergence, social structure and national systems of policies. Oxford and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dore, R. (2000). Stock market capitalism, welfare capitalism: Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drejer, I. (2000). Comparing patterns of industrial interdependence in national systems of innovation-A study of Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan and the US. Economic Systems Research, 12, 377–399.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (2008). Small Country (Region) innovation systems: Globalization, change and policy in Asia and Europe. Science Technology & Society, 39(1), 186–187.
   Google Scholar
• Evans. (2008). Prospects for developing government in the Twenty-first Century. UK: Centre for Global Political Economy, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Foxon, T., Reed, M., & Stringer, L. (2009). Governing long-term social-ecological change: What can the resilience and transitions approaches learn from each other? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Schwirten, C. (1999). Enterprise-university cooperation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 6, 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gergils, H. (2013). The changing national innovation system in Nordic countries (In Chinese). Beijing: Intellectual Property Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemphill, T. (2014). Patent assertion entities: Do they impede innovation and technology commercialization. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(2), 717–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. (1996). An evolutionary theory of long-term economic growth. International Studies Quarterly, 40(3), 391–410.
   Google Scholar
• Ibataarens, K. (2012). Comparing national innovation systems in Japan and the United States: Push, pull, drag and jump factors in the development of new technology. Asia Pacific Business Review, 14(3), 315–338.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, T. (2013). Growth, crisis and prospects for economic recovery in East Asia. In S. Joseph & Y. Shahid (Eds.), Reflections on the miracle of East Asia (In Chinese) Wang Y.Q., & Zhu W.J. (Trans.), (pp. 46-77). Beijing: China Renmin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, X. (2016). Government delegation and innovations in State-Owned enterprises: A perspective from the pyramid structure of local state-owned enterprises. Management World (In Chinese), 9, 120–135.
   Google Scholar
• Jungmittag, A. (2000). The national system of innovation in the United States and Germany. Changing innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, L. (2012). The national system of industrial innovation: The impetus for capacity building in South Korea. In R. L. Nielsen (Ed.), Compilation of comparative analysis of national (Regional) innovation systems (In Chinese) Zeng, G.P., Liu, X.L., Wang C.T., & Li, H.L. (Trans.), (pp. 446-481). Beijing: Intellectual Property Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• La Porta, R. (1999). Investor protection: Origins, consequences, reform. NBER working Paper 7428. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass
   Google Scholar
• Lazonick, W. (2003). The theory of the market economy and the social foundations of innovative enterprise. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(1), 9–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Moon, H. (2017). Main science and technology indicators of Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Leoncini, R. (1998). The nature of long-run technological change: Innovation, evolution and technological systems. Research Policy, 27, 75–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, H., & Wang, H. (2013). Reflections on German innovation system. Science of Science and Technology Management, 34(06), 52-57. (In Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, A. (1985). Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Denmark: Aalborg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. (2009). A note on characteristics of and recent trends in national innovation policy strategies in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. Aalborg, Denmark: University of Aalborg, Department of Business Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C. (1992). The U.S. National innovation system: Origins and prospects for change. Research Policy, 21(2), 125–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Demand-side innovation policies. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrived from http://doi/org/1-.1787/9789264098886-en.
   Google Scholar
• Overholt, W. (1999). Thailand’s financial and political system: Crisis and rejuvenation. Asian Survey, 39, 1009–1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, B. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantages of nations. Competitive Intelligence Review, 1(1), 427.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, D., & Li, X. (2013). Research on innovation policy of South Korean government: From “boating” to “steering”. Public Administration Review, 5, 20-35. (In Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2005). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. CEPR Discussion Papers, 4767. London: Center for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2006). Industrial development: Stylized facts and policies. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 19(1), 211–214.
   Google Scholar
• Roper, S. (1997). Product innovation and small business growth: A comparison of the strategies of German, U.K. and Irish companies. Small Business Economics, 9, 523–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, P. (2003). Turning back the tide-welfare lesson from America. Policy: A Journal of Public Policy and Ideas, 19(1), 8-14.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1912–1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. (2009). Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, S. (2009). The German national innovation system and the competitive advantage of German manufacturing. German Studies, 24(1), 4-8. (In Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1996). Hidden champions: Lessons from 500 of the world´s best unknown companies. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1904). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J., & Greenwald, B. (2014). Creating a learning society: A new approach to growth, development, and social progress. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Zhuo, Z., & Jiang, Y. (2015). Institutional evolution of universities’ major role in national innovation system of the US – Innovation-process based analysis. Educational Research, 36(8), 139-150. (In Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Woo-Cumings, M. (1999). The developmental state. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q. (2015). Analysis of historical characteristics of Swedish innovation model. Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 21-30. (In Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. Y. (2016). Re-discussion about industrial policies: How industrial policies block innovation. Beijing: Peking University Forum on Intellectual Property rights and Innovation.(In Chinese)
   Google Scholar