How cultural and organizational conditions impact on policy entrepreneurship: evidence from Thailand

References

• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington. DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, K. P. (2007). Strategic service partnerships and boundary-spanning behaviour: A study of multiple cascading policy windows ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Blaire, R., & Janousek, C. L. (2013). Collaborative mechanism in interlocal cooperation: A longitudinal examination. State and Local Government Review, 45(4), 268–282.
   Google Scholar
• Bogason, P., & Musso, J. A. (2006). The democratic prospects of network governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamchong, P. (2016). The initiation and sustainability of collaboration between small local governments: A comparative analysis of England and Thailand ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative science quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, N. (2016). Policy entrepreneurs and agenda setting. In N. Zahariadis (Ed.), Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting (pp. 180–199). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Local Administration, Thailand. (2008). The final report: The results of pilot projects on cooperation between local governments. Bangkok: Department of Local Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Local Administration, Thailand. (2019). Information of local government [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.dla.go.th/work/abt/
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, D. R. (2013). Policy entrepreneurship in China’s response to urban poverty. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, A. J. (2018). Manoeuvring within a fragmented bureaucracy: Policy entrepreneurship in China’s local healthcare reform. The China quarterly, 236, 1088–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulst, R., & Van Montfort, A. (2011). Institutional features of inter-municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 121–144.
   Google Scholar
• Hulst, R., van Montfort, A., Haveri, A., Airaksinen, J., & Kelly, J. (2009). Institutional shifts in inter-municipal service delivery: An analysis of developments in eight western european countries. Public Organization Review, 9(3), 263–285.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Krueathep, W. (2004). Local government initiatives in Thailand: Cases and lessons learned. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 26(6), 217–239.
   Google Scholar
• Krueathep, W., Riccucci, N. M., & Suwanmala, C. (2010). Why do agencies work together? The determinants of network formation at the subnational level of government in Thailand. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 157–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labianca, M. (2014). Inter-municipal cooperation: From cooperation through rules to cooperation through networks: Empirical evidence from Puglia. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 184–206.
   Google Scholar
• Lober, D. J. (1997). Explaining the formation of business-environmentalist collaborations: Collaborative windows and the paper task force. Policy sciences, 30, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. (2002). Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it. Public administration review, 62(5), 599–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public administration review, 66, 33–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (2009). Policy theory, policy theory everywhere: Ravings of a deranged policy scholar. The Policy Studies Journal, 37, 5–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertha, A. (2009). Fragmented authoritarianism 2.0: Political pluralization in the Chinese policy process. The China quarterly, 200, 995–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowlin, M. C. (2011). Theories of the policy process: State of the research and emerging trends. The Policy Studies Journal, 39, 41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2008). Time, policy, management: Governing with the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Setthasuravich, P. (2016, May). Kingdon’s model of agenda setting of rail transit system in Thailand: A case study of Thailand’s high speed train project. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Magsaysay Awardees on good governance and transformative leadership in Asia, Maha Sarakham, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., & Sullivan, H. (2008). Theory-driven approaches to analysing collaborative performance. Public Management Review, 10(6), 751–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. (2014, September). Collaboration as ‘the new normal’. Paper presented at Policy & Politics Conference, Bristol, England.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2002). Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, L. M., & Smutny, G. (2002). Collaborative windows and organizational governance: Exploring the formation and demise of social service partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 165–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodoro, M. P. (2009). Bureaucratic job mobility and the diffusion of innovations. American journal of political science, 53, 175–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udomwisawakul, N. (2005). Agenda setting and policy formulation: A case of agricultural commodity and food standards policy in Thailand (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Wangmahaporn, P. (2003). The elderly policy in Thailand (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Warm, D. (2011). Local government collaboration for a new decade: Risk, trust, and effectiveness. State and Local Government Review, 43(1), 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public administration, 80(1), 103–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X. (2008). Strategies of Chinese policy entrepreneurs in the third sector: Challenges of ‘technical infeasibility’. Policy sciences, 41, 315–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. (2012). Policy entrepreneur, civic engagement and local policy innovation in China: Housing monetarisation reform in Guizhou province. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(2), 191–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar