486
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Can the dual identity of policy entrepreneur and policy implementer promote successful policy adoption? Vertical greening policymaking in Shanghai, China

, , &
Pages 113-128 | Received 24 Mar 2019, Accepted 10 Jun 2019, Published online: 14 Jun 2019

References

  • Faling, M., Biesbroek, R., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., & Termeer, K. (2019). Policy entrepreneurship across boundaries: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Policy, 39(2), 393–422.
  • Araral, E., & Amri, M. (2016). Institutions and the policy process 2.0: Implications of the IAD Framework. In Peters, B. G., & Zittoun, P. (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to public policy (pp. 73–93). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Baier, V. E., March, J. G., & Saetren, H. (1986). Implementation and ambiguity. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 2(3–4), 197–212.
  • Bakir, C. (2005). The exoteric politics of bank mergers in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 51(2), 235–256.
  • Bakir, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multilevel governance of central banking reform. Governance, 22(4), 571–598.
  • Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. (2017). Contextualising the context in policy entrepreneurship and institutional change. Policy and Society 36(4), 465–478.
  • Berman, P. (1978). The study of macro-and micro-implementation. Public Policy, 26(2), 157.
  • Cairney, P. (2018). Three habits of successful policy entrepreneurs. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 199–215.
  • Cairney, P., & Kwiatkowski, R. (2017). How to communicate effectively with policymakers: Combine insights from psychology and policy studies. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 37.
  • Claus, K., & Rousseau, S. (2012). Public versus private incentives to invest in green roofs: A cost benefit analysis for Flanders. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(4), 417–425.
  • Feng, Y. (2012). Studies on law issues of China’s roof greening. Chongqing: Southwest University of Political Science and Law.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
  • Frisch-Aviram, N., Cohen, N., & Beeri, I. (2018). Low-level bureaucrats, local government regimes and policy entrepreneurship. Policy Sciences, 51(1), 39–57.
  • Hammond, D. R. (2013). Policy entrepreneurship in China’s response to urban poverty. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 119–146.
  • He, J. A. (2018). Manoeuvring within a fragmented bureaucracy: Policy entrepreneurship in China’s local healthcare reform. The China Quarterly, 236, 1088–1110.
  • Hopkins, V. (2016). Institutions, incentives, and policy entrepreneurship. Policy Studies Journal, 44(3), 332–348.
  • Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles & policy subsystems (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hu, Y. (1994). Potent measure to increase Shanghai’s greenspace area—Roof greening. Shanghai Construction Science&Technology, 5, 015.
  • Hu, Y. (2018). To develop greenspaces by relocating houses at high cost; To build green lung in downtown. XinMin Evening News.
  • Jin, Y., Chen, G., & Ma, W. (2015). Pre-recognition of the target orientation of the ‘National Garden City’ from the evolution of evaluation indexes. Shanghai Urban Planning, (05), 75–80.
  • Keeley, M., Koburger, A., Dolowitz, D. P., Medearis, D., Nickel, D., & Shuster, W. (2013). Perspectives on the use of green infrastructure for stormwater management in Cleveland and Milwaukee. Environmental Management, 51(6), 1093–1108.
  • Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and policies. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Li, H. (2015). Amendment of greening regulations: To facilitate vertical greening expanding into space. Monthly of Shanghai People’s Congress, (7), 19–20.
  • Li, L. (2010). Shanghai becomes greener after the Expo 2010. Garden, (12), 16–19.
  • Li, R. (2007). Discussion and countermeasures of falter of urban roof garden development. Shanghai: Tongji University.
  • Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1990). Policy formulation and the challenge of conscious design. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13(3), 303–311.
  • Lu, H. M. (2016). Review of 30 years’ development of vertical greening in Shanghai. Garden, (1), 78–83.
  • Ma, Y. (2007). Specification about the Shanghai Greening Regulation (draft). Communique of Standting Committee of Shanghai People's Congress, (1), 9–12.
  • Madden, S. S. A. (2010). Choosing green over gray: Philadelphia’s innovative stormwater infrastructure plan(Master's thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  • Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.
  • Meijerink, S., & Huitema, D. (2010). Policy entrepreneurs and change strategies: Lessons from sixteen case studies of water transitions around the globe. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 21.
  • Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.
  • Nakamura, R. T., & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Noordegraaf, M. (2000). Professional sense-makers: Managerial competencies amidst ambiguity. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13(4), 319–332.
  • Noordegraaf, M. (2010). Academic accounts of policy experience. In Colebatch, H. K., Hoppe, R., & Noordegraaf, M. (Eds.), Working for Policy (pp. 43–67). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Noordegraaf, M. (2014). Shadowing managerial action instead of recording managerial text. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: an International Journal, 9(1), 41–46.
  • Pan, Z. (2000). Improvising reform activities. In Lee, C.C., & Li, J. (Eds), Power, money, and media: Communication patterns and bureaucratic control in cultural China (pp. 68–111). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  • People’s Government of Jing`an District. (2002). Implementation opinion on roof greening of Jing`an District, Shanghai(trial). Shanghai.
  • Rabe, B. G. (1999). Federalism and entrepreneurship: Explaining American and Canadian innovation in pollution prevention and regulatory integration. Policy Studies Journal, 27(2), 288–306.
  • Rhodes, R., & Noordegraaf, M. (2007). Observing government elites: Up close and personal. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • SAGCA. (2015). Shanghai greening regulations. Retrieved Date from http://cgzf.sh.gov.cn/main/news_91.html.
  • SAGCA. (2017). SAGCA’s response to “The proposal of to generalize green roof”. Shanghai: Author.
  • SAGCA & Shanghai Station of Landscape Management. (2015). Compilation of Shanghai vertical greening documents. Shanghai: Shanghai Administration of Greening and City Appearance.
  • Shonkoff, J. P. (2000). Science, policy, and practice: Three cultures in search of a shared mission. Child Development, 71(1), 181–187.
  • Sun, J., & You, H. (2012). The most advanced achievement and important impact of vertical greening of Shanghai world EXPO. Modern Horticulture, (4), 73.
  • Wang, S. (2008). Changing models of China’s policy agenda setting. Modern China, 34(1), 56–87.
  • Winter, S. (1986). How policy‐making affects implementation: The decentralization of the Danish disablement pension administration. Scandinavian Political Studies, 9(4), 361–385.
  • Yang, F., Zhang, D., & Nie, W. (2008). To develop Chinese-featured roof greening. Modern Agricultural Sciences and Technology, (5), 56–59.
  • Zahariadis, N. (2014). Ambiguity and multiple streams. Theories of the Policy Process, 3, 25–59.
  • Zhang, Y., Li, J. Q., & Wang, W. L. (2016). Analysis of several major puzzles and countermeasures of Sponge City construction. China Water & Waste Water, 32(12), 7–11.
  • Zhou, N., & Feng, F. (2014). Applying multiple streams theoretical framework to college matriculation policy reform for children of migrant workers in China. Public Policy and Administration Research, 4(10), 1–11.
  • Zhu, X. (2008). Strategy of Chinese policy entrepreneurs in the third sector: Challenges of “technical infeasibility”. Policy Sciences, 41(4), 315–334.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.