Academics in public office as policy entrepreneurs: their important role in Indonesia’s administrative reform

References

• Aruan, C. D. (2015). HRM reform in the indonesian civil service: Towards strategic fit? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Basri, M. C. (2017). Reform in an imperfect world: The case of Indonesia. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 31(2), 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandl, J. (1998). Money and good intentions are not enough: or, why a liberal democrat thinks states need both competition and community. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Brender, V. (2010). Economic transformations in chile: The formation of the Chicago boys. American Economist, 55(1), 111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Christopoulos, D. C. (2006). Relational attributes of political entrepreneurs: A network perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(5), 757–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, G., & Hermawan, Y. P. (2002). Whose Agenda? “Partnership” and International assistance to democratization and governance reform in Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 24(2), CS24–2b.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). qualitative inquiry and research design, choosing among five approaches (Fourth ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. (2010). Observing government elites: Up close and personal - edited by R.A.W. Rhodes, Paul ‘t Hart and Mirko Noordegraaf. Public Administration, 88(1), 269–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fane, G. (1999). Indonesian economic policies and performance, 1960–98. The World Economy, 22(5), 651–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch Aviram, N., Cohen, N., & Beeri, I. (2019). Wind(ow) of change: A systematic review of policy entrepreneurship characteristics and strategies. Policy Studies Journal, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gains, F. (2011). Elite ethnographies: Potential, pitfalls and prospects for getting “Up close and personal.”. Public Administration, 89(1), 156–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, D. (2010). Academic influence amongst the UK public elite. Sociology, 44(4), 734–750. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857438
   Google Scholar
• Hadiz, V., & Robison, R. (2005). Neo-liberal reforms and illiberal consolidations: The Indonesian Paradox. Journal of Development Studies, 41(2), 220–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadiz, V. R., & Dhakidae, D. (2005). Introduction. In V. R. Hadiz & D. Dhakidae (Eds.), Social science and power in indonesia (pp. 1–29). Singapore: Equinox Publishing (Asia) Pte. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state : The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, D. R. (2013). Policy entrepreneurship in China’s response to Urban poverty. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, A. J. (2018). Manoeuvring within a fragmented bureaucracy: Policy entrepreneurship in China’s local healthcare reform. The China Quarterly, 236, 1088–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, L. M., & Thissen, W. A. H. (2009). Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysts. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 808–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heryanto, A. (2005). Ideological baggage and orientations of the social science in Indonesia. In V. R. Hadiz & D. Dhakidae (Eds.), Social science and power in Indonesia (pp. 57–89). Singapore: Equinox Publishing (Asia) Pte. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Heryanto, A., & Hadiz, V. R. (2005). Post-authoritarian Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 37(2), 251–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, V. (2016). Institutions, incentives, and policy entrepreneurship. Policy Studies Journal, 44(3), 332–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwan, A. (2005). Institutions, discourses, and conflicts in economic thought. In V. R. Hadiz & D. Dhakidae (Eds.), Social science and power in Indonesia (pp. 31–56). Singapore: Equinox Publishing (Asia) Pte. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Juwono, V. (2016). Berantas Korupsi: A political history of governance reform and anti-corruption initiatives in Indonesia. The London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3381/1/Juwono_Berantas_Korupsi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Juwono, V. (2017). The perils and challenges of advancing economic governance reform in Indonesia: An endeavor by the technocrats in the new order Era. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Administrative Science, Policy and Governance Studies (ICAS-PGS 2017) and the International Conference on Business Administration and Policy (ICBAP 2017) (Vol. 167, pp. 128–134). Paris, France: Atlantis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerby, M. (2009). Worth the wait: Determinants of ministerial appointment in Canada, 1935–2008. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42(03), 593.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agenda, alternatives, and public policies (Updated Se). Boston, MA: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kusman, A. P. (2015). The Politics of Good Governance in Post-Authoritarian East Java: Intellectuals and Local Power in Indonesia. Dissertation. Murdoch University.
   Google Scholar
• Letelier, O. (1976). Economic “Freedom’s” Awful Toll; The “Chicago Boys” in Chile. Review of Radical Political Economics, 8(3), 44–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, T. (2002). Indonesian constitutional reform: Muddling towards democracy. Singapore Journal of International & Comparative Law, 244–301. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/singa6&div=12&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals&t=1560750295
   Google Scholar
• Macintyre, A. (1992). Business and Politics in Indonesia. Sydney: Asian Studies Association of Australia in association with Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Mallarangeng, A., & Tuijl, P. V. (2004). Partnership for governance reform in Indonesia. Third World Quarterly, 25(5), 919–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallarangeng, R. (2000). Liberalizing New Order Indonesia: Ideas, Epistemic Community, and Economic Policy Change, 1986–1992. Dissertation. The Ohio State University. Retrieved from 10.16953/deusbed.74839
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & McConnell, A. (2010). Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration, 88(2), 564–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, A. (2010). Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 345–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, A. (2015). What is policy failure? A primer to help navigate the maze. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 221–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, D., & Robet, R. (2019). Don’t ask, don’t tell: Academics and electoral politics in Indonesia. Contemporary Politics, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijerink, S., & Huitema, D. (2010). Policy entrepreneurs and change strategies : Lessons from sixteen case studies of water transitions around the globe. Ecology and Society, 15, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, R. S. (1982). Technocrats and Politics in the ASEAN countries. Pacific Affairs, 55(3), 403–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Thomas, M. (2018). Policy entrepreneurs and collaborative action: Pursuit of the sustainable development goals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1996). Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3), 420–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion : The case of state education reforms. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 126–148. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2648004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, L. A., & Clark, I. D. (2015). Making reform stick: Political acumen as an element of political capacity for policy change and innovation. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 247–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakhmani, I., & Siregar, F. (2016). Reforming research in Indonesia: Policies and practice. Retrieved from http://cipg.or.id/gdn/
   Google Scholar
• Ransom, D. (1970). The Berkeley Mafia and the Indonesian Massacre. Ramparts, 9(4), 26–49.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), 147–175. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1181732
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1996). Transforming public policy: dynamics of policy entrepreneurship and innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, P. (1991). Technocrats and politics in Chile : From the Chicago boys to the. Journal of Latin American Studies, 23(2), 385–410. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/157030
   Google Scholar
• Teik, K. B., Tadem, T. S. E., & Shiraishi, T. (2014). Technocracy and economic decision-making in Southeast Asia: An overview. Southeast Asian Studies, 3(2), 241–253.
   Google Scholar
• Wart, M. V. (2019). Public-sector leadership theory : An assessment. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 214–228.
   Google Scholar
• Wicaksono, A. (2018). The role of policy transfer in Indonesian governance: The case of academic administrative entrepreneurs. Policy Studies, 39(6), 622–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2006). Opportunities and constraints for civil service reform in Indonesia, exploration of a new approach and methodology. Jakarta.
   Google Scholar
• Yasin, M. (2017). Anotasi Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang administrasi pemerintahan. Jakarta: UI-CSGAR.
   Google Scholar