Making collective policy entrepreneurship work: the case of China’s post-disaster reconstruction

References

• Arnold, G. (2015). Street-level policy entrepreneurship. Public Management Review, 17, 307–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D. L., & Steuernagel, T. (2009). Comparative policy entrepreneurship: The case of autism-related policy in North America. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11, 233–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borins, S. (2000). Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 498–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamchong, P. (2019). How cultural and organizational conditions impact on policy entrepreneurship: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Asian Public Policy. doi:10.1080/17516234.2019.1630886
   Google Scholar
• Chang-Richards, A. Y., Wilkinson, S., Seville, E., & Potangaroa, R. (2011). An integrated approach: Managing resources for post-disaster reconstruction. Disasters, 35(4), 739–765.
   Google Scholar
• Christopoulos, D. C. (2006). Relational attributes of political entrepreneurs: A network perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(5), 757–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N. (2016). Policy entrepreneurs and agenda setting. In N. Zahariadis (Ed.), Handbook of public policy agenda setting (pp. 180–199). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N. (2018). How culture affects street-level bureaucrats’ bending the rules in the context of informal payments for health care: The Israeli case. American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, H. (1975). Case study and theory in political science. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, & P. Foster (Eds.), Case study method. London (pp. 50–118), UK: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y. (2012). Urban resilience in post-disaster reconstruction: Towards a resilient development in China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 3(1), 45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, D. R. (2013). Policy entrepreneurship in China’s response to urban poverty. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, A. J. W. (2018). Maneuvering within a fragmented bureaucracy: Vested interests: Policy entrepreneurship in China’s local healthcare reform. The China Quarterly, 236, 1088–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heifetz, R. (1994). Leadership without Easy Answers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S. V. (2010). Realizing water transitions: The role of policy entrepeneurs in water policy change. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 26. online. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. R. (2010). Understanding street-level bureaucrats decision making: Determining eligibility in the social security disability program. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 247–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. J., & Roberts, N. C. (1992). An investigation into the personality profile of policy entrepreneurs. Public Productivity & Management Review, 16, 173–190.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, M. A., & Sanger, M. B. (1994). Making government work: How entrepreneurial executives turn bright ideas into real results. San Francisco: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. B. (2011). Leap: Experience and thinking by a reconstruction cadre in Wenchuan disaster (in Chinese). Guangzhou: Yangcheng evening news press.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Mayer, A. L., Wellstead, A. M., & Zhou, S. (2019). Can the dual identity of policy entrepreneur and policy implementer promote successful policy adoption? Vertical greening policymaking in Shanghai, China. Journal of Asian Public Policy. doi:10.1080/17516234.2019.1631241
   Google Scholar
• Maurya, D., & Mintrom, M. (2019). Policy entrepreneurs as catalysts of broad system change: The case of social health insurance adoption in India. Journal of Asian Public Policy. doi:10.1080/17516234.2019.1617955
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 738–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Salisbury, C. (2014). Policy entrepreneurs, creative teamwork, and policy change. In D. Alexander & J. M. Lewis (Eds.), Making public policy decisions: expertise, skills, and experience (pp. 129–145). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. Journal of Politics, 60, 126–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navot, D., & Cohen, N. (2015). How policy entrepreneurs reduce corruption in Israel. Governance, 28(1), 61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oborn, E., Michael, B., & Mark, E. (2011). Policy entrepreneurship in the development of public sector strategy: The case of London health reform. Public Administration, 89(2), 325–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1965). Public entrepreneurship: A case study in ground water basin management (PhD. Dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Y. (2015). A comparison of two approaches to develop concentrated rural settlements after the 5.12 Sichuan Earthquake in China. Habitat International, 49, 230–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. (2005). How management matters: Street-level bureaucrats and welfare reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1996). Transforming public policy: Dynamics of policy entrepreneurship and innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shaoguang, W. (2008). Learning and adapting: The case of rural healthcare financing in China (in Chinese). Social Sciences in China, 6, 111–133.
   Google Scholar
• Teske, P., & Schneider, M. (1994). The bureaucratic entrepreneur: The case of city managers. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 331–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16, 527–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L. (1969). The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States. American Political Science Review, 63, 880–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration, 80(1), 103–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Lu, Y. (2013a). Counterpart assistance: A systematic approach for post-wenchuan earthquake recovery and reconstruction. Disaster Advances, 6(2), 58–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, F., & Tu, Y. (2018). An evaluation of the paired assistance to disaster-affected areas program in disaster recovery: The case of the wenchuan earthquake. Sustainability, 10(12), 4483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Hong, L., Leonard, O., & Yinyu, Y. (2013). A behavioral model of muddling through in the Chinese bureaucracy. The China Journal, 70, 120–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X. (2014). Mandate versus championship: Vertical government intervention and diffusion of innovation in public services in authoritarian China. Public Management Review, 16(1), 117–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X. (2017). Executive entrepreneurship, career mobility and the transfer of policy paradigms. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. doi:10.1080/13876988.2017.1390865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. (2012). Policy entrepreneur, civic engagement and local policy innovation in China: Housing monetarisation reform in Guizhou province. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(2), 191–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar