The emergence and contested growth of social enterprise in Thailand

References

• Aspers, P., & Beckert, J. (2011). Value in markets. In The worth of goods: Valuation and pricing in the economy (pp. 3–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing. Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2010). How do fields change? The interrelations of institutions, networks, and cognition in the dynamics of markets. Organization Studies, 31(5), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610372184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, C., & Boeckler, M. (2009). Geographies of circulation and exchange: Constructions of markets. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509104805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, C., & Boeckler, M. (2011). Geographies of markets: Materials, morals and monsters in motion. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510384498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billis, D. (Ed.). (2010). Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1998). The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. In M. Callon (Ed.), The laws of the markets.(pp.1-57) Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (2007). An essay on the growing contribution of economic markets to the proliferation of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7–8), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407084701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, Y., & Wong, L. (2016). Introduction. In Y. Chandra & L. Wong (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship in the Greater China Region: Policy and cases.(pp.1-7). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2003). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and post graduate students. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, T. S., & Kerlin, J. A. (2017). China: The diffusion of social enterprise innovation: Exported and imported international influence. Shaping Social Enterprise: Understanding Institutional Context and Influence, 79–107.https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-250-320171004
   Google Scholar
• Cukier, W., Trenholme, S., Carl, D., & Gekas, G. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A content analysis. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 7(1), 99–119. http://www.na-businesspress.com/JSIS/cukier_abstract.html
   Google Scholar
• Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.43
   Google Scholar
• Dees, J. G., & Elias, J. (1998). The challenges of combining social and commercial enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1), 165–178.https://doi.org/10.2307/3857527
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2006). Defining social enterprise. In M. Nyssens (Ed.), Social enterprise: At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society (pp. 3–26). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), 2469–2497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9884-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920‒1940. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp.1-38). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (p.38). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Djelic, M. L. (2004). Social networks and country to country transfer: Dense and weak ties in the diffusion of knowledge. Socio-Economic Review, 2(3), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/soceco/2.3.341
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, B., Davies, I. A., & Tranchell, S. (2013). Where now for fair trade? Business History, 55(2), 161–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2012.692083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, B., Smith, A., & Parker, S. (2015). Fair trade market creation and marketing in the global south. Geoforum, 67 (December), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elinoff, E. (2014). Unmaking civil society: Activist schisms and autonomous politics in Thailand. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 36(3), 356–385. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs36-3b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elinoff, E. (2019). Subjects of politics: Between democracy and dictatorship in Thailand. Anthropological Theory, 19(1), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499618782365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Laviada, A., López-Gutiérrez, C., & San-Martín, P. (2020). The moderating effect of countries’ development on the characterization of the social entrepreneur: An empirical analysis with GEM data. Voluntas, 31(3), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00216-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & Dauter, L. (2007). The sociology of markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gephardt, R. (2004). What is qualitative research and why is it important. Academy of Management Journal, 7(4), 454‐62. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2004.14438580
   Google Scholar
• Gillett, A., Loader, K., Doherty, B., & Scott, J. M. (2018). An examination of tensions in a hybrid collaboration: A longitudinal study of an empty homes project. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 949-967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3962-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede Insights. (2020). What about Thailand? Retrieved April 1, 2020. Hofstede Insights. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country/thailand/
   Google Scholar
• Jaffee, D. (2010). Fair trade standards, corporate participation, and social movement responses in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(S2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0583-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffee, D., & Howard, P. (2010). Corporate cooptation of organic and fair trade standards. Agriculture and Human Values, 27(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9231-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, B. (2017). South Korea: Government directed social enterprise development: Toward a new Asian social enterprise country model’. In Kerlin, J.A.(Ed.), Shaping social enterprise (pp. 49–77). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kerlin, J. A. (2010). A comparative analysis of the global emergence of social enterprise. Voluntas, 21(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-010-9126-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlin, J. A. (2017). Shaping social enterprise: Understanding institutional context and influence. Emerald Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Laville, J. L., & Nyssens, M. (2001). The social enterprise: Towards a theoretical socio-economic approach. In C. Borzaga & J. Defourny (Eds.), The emergence of social enterprise (pp. 312–332). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In  Clegg, R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T.B. and Nord, W.R.(Eds.,), The Sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., Terjesen, S., & Bosma, N. (2013). Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: The global entrepreneurship monitor social entrepreneurship study. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9398-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien Centre for Social Innovation. (2014). From charity to change: Social investment in selected Southeast Asian Countries [Online]. Retrieved March 9, 2016. Lien Centre for Social Innovation. http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lien_reports/11/
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., Moss, T. W., Gras, D. M., Kato, S., & Amezcua, A. S. (2013). Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: How are they different, if at all? Small Business Economics, 40(3), 761–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9399-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maak, T., & Stoetter, N. (2012). Social entrepreneurs as responsible leaders:‘Fundación Paraguaya’and the case of Martin Burt. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1417-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C., & Doherty, B. (2016). A fair trade-off? Paradoxes in the governance of fair-trade social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2511-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on management: Inside our strange world of organisations. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. J., & Coombes, S. M. (2009). A model of social entrepreneurial discovery. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9921-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(40), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Google Scholar
• Paroutis, S., & Heracleous, L. (2013). Discourse revisited: Dimensions and employment of first‐order strategy discourse during institutional adoption. Strategic management journal, 34(8),935-956. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/smj.2052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peattie, K., & Morley, A. (2008). Eight paradoxes of the social enterprise research agenda. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610810901995
   Google Scholar
• Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the Concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation (4th ed.). New York Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruef, M., & Scott, R. W. (1998). A multidimensional model of organisational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877–904. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueschemeyer, D. (2009). Usable theory: Analytic tools for social and political research. University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1413-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, S., & Sahay, A. (2017). Social entrepreneurship research in Asia-Pacific: Perspectives and opportunities. Social Enterprise Journal, 13(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-11-2016-0050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Tracey, P. (2016). Institutional complexity and paradox theory: Complementarities of competing demands. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016638565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, S. (2012). Negotiating tensions. How do social enterprises in the homelessness field balance social and commercial tensions? Housing Studies, 27(4), 514–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.677015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (1999). Historical Institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, I., & Lyon, F. (2013). Beyond green niches? Growth strategies of environmentally-motivated social enterprises. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 1–22 or ESRC Third Sector Research Centre Working paper 108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612457700
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, F., & Post, J. E. (2013). Business models for people, planet (and profit): Exploring the phenomena of social business, a market-based approach to social value creation. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 715–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9401-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2020). Governance effectiveness. Retrieved April 3, 2020. World Bank Policy Research Group. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#home
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2018). The global competitiveness report. Retrieved April 2, 2020. World Economic Forum. https://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2018/the-global-competitiveness-report-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Wry, T., & Zhao, E. Y. (2018). Taking trade-offs seriously: Examining the contextually contingent relationship between social outreach intensity and financial sustainability in global microfinance. Organization Science, 29(3), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar