Technocratic and deliberative nexus in policy analysis: Learning from smart city planning in Chiang Mai, Thailand

References

• Andrews, C. (2007). Rationality in policy decision making. In F. Fischer, G. Miller, & M. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and method (pp. 161–171). CRC/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Boossabong, P., & Chamchong, P. (2021). Public policy in the face of post-truth politics and the role of deliberation. Critical Policy Studies, 15(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2020.1724168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooker, P. (2014). Non-democratic Regimes. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bua, A., & Escobar, O. (2018). Participatory-deliberative processes and public policy agendas: Lessons for policy and practice. Policy Design and Practice, 1(2), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1469242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2020). Understanding public policy: Theories and issues. Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chamchong, P., & Boossabong, P. (2021). Innovative city index and its application for stimulating inclusive, sustainable and connected innovative city development. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(1), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09744-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C., & Radaelli, C. (2020). Technocracy and the policy process. In E. Bertsou & D. Caramani (Eds.), The technocratic challenge to democracy (pp. 183–195). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. (2018). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Durnova, A., Fischer, F., & Zittoun, P. (2016). Discursive approaches to public policy: Politics, argumentation, and deliberation. In G. Peters & P. Zittoun (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to public policy: Theories, controversies and perspectives (pp. 35–56). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2007). Deliberative policy analysis as practical reason: Integrating empirical and normative arguments. In F. Fischer, G. Miller, & M. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and method (pp. 223–236). CRC/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Boossabong, P. (2018). Deliberative policy analysis. In A. (Bächtiger, J. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, & M. Warren (Eds.), The oxford handbook of deliberative democracy (pp. 584–594). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, R., & Rihani, S. (2010). Complexity and public policy: A new approach to twenty-first century politics, policy and society. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnell, J. (1982). The technocratic image and the theory of technocracy. Technology and Culture, 23(3), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.2307/3104485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834510939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Dassen, T. (2014). Smart about cities: Visualizing the challenge for 21st century urbanism. NAI010 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M., & Furlong, S. (2015). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives. SAGE/CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuecker, G., & Hartley, K. (2020). How smart cities became the urban norm: Power and knowledge in New Songdo City. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(2), 516–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1617102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landwehr, C. (2010). Democratic and technocratic policy deliberation. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 434–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171003619865
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2015). Think tank 2.0 for deliberative policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 48(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9207-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2019). Deliberative policy analysis: Towards a methodological orientation. Policy Studies, 40(5), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1618812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, B., & Graham, P. (2000). Technocratic discourse: A primer. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30(3), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.2190/56FY-V5TH-2U3U-MHQK
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. (2008). Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory? Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha, H., S. Ghimire, A. Pain, A. Nightingale, D. Khatri, and H. Dhungana. (2017). “Policy Without Politics: Technocratic Control of Climate Change Adaptation Policy Making in Nepal.” Climate Policy, 16(4), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.1003775
   Google Scholar
• Ojha, H., Ghimire, S., Pain, A., Nightingale, A., Khatri, D., & Dhungana, H. (2016). Policy without politics: Technocratic control of climate change adaptation policy making in Nepal. Climate Policy, 16(4), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.1003775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overeem, P. (2005). The value of the dichotomy: Politics, administration, and the political neutrality of administrators. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 27(2), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2005.11029490
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J. (Eds.). (2012). Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quick, K., & Bryson, J. (2016). Public participation. In C. Ansell & J. T. Cheltenham (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 158-169). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. (2016). Analysis and public policy: Successes, failures and directions for reform. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. (2016). Deliberative policy analysis. In P. H. Pattberg & F. Zelli (Eds.), Edward Elgar Encyclopedia for global environmental governance and politics (pp. 96–103). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2020). Counting: How we use numbers to decide what matters. Liveright Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. (2015). Meaning in action: Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K. (2007). Quantitative methods for policy analysis. In F. Fischer, G. Miller, & M. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and method (pp. 349–360). CRC/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar