The role of tool calibrations and policy specifications in policy change: evidence from healthcare reform efforts in Korea 1990-2020

References

• Bali, A. S., Howlett, M., Lewis, J., & Ramesh, M. (2021). Procedural Policy Tools in Theory and Practice. Policy & Society, 40(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1965379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannink, D., & Hoogenboom, M. (2007). Hidden Change: Disaggregation of Welfare Regimes for Greater Insight into Welfare State Change. Journal of European Social Policy, 17(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928707071877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., Jordan, A., Green-Pedersen, C., & Héritier, A. (eds.). (2012). Dismantling Public Policy: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D., & Wilkerson, J. (2011). Comparative Studies of Policy Dynamics. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 947–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011405160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beland, D., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2016). Obamacare Wars: Federalism, State Politics, and the Affordable Care Act (1 edition ed.). University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, W. J., & de Boer, F. W. (2014, April). The Historical Dynamics of Social–Ecological Traps. Ambio, 43(3), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0419-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candel, J., & Daugbjerg, C. (2019, November 26). Overcoming the Dependent Variable Problem in Studying Food Policy. Food Security.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G. (2009). Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 7–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020, January). The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes:. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824401990056. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, S., & Miller, C. J. (2012). Regulatory Stringency and Policy Drivers: A Reassessment of Renewable Portfolio Standards. Policy Studies Journal, 40(4), 730–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B. (2011). Paradigm Man Vs. the Bricoleur: Bricolage as an Alternative Vision of Agency in Ideational Change. European Political Science Review, 3(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 532–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 532–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, H., & Margetts, H. Z. (2007). The Tools of Government in the Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, A., Kwon, S., & Cowley, P. (2019). Health Financing Reforms for Moving towards Universal Health Coverage in the Western Pacific Region. Health Systems & Reform, 5(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2018.1544029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugbjerg, C. (1997). Policy Networks and Agricultural Policy Reforms: Explaining Deregulation in Sweden and Re-Regulation in the European Community. Governance, 10(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.341997034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, M. (2014, February 15). Development towards Sustainability: How to Judge Past and Proposed Policies? Science of the Total Environment, 472, 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. (2004). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuis, J., & Biesbroek, R. (2013, December). Comparing Apples and Oranges: The Dependent Variable Problem in Comparing and Evaluating Climate Change Adaptation Policies. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1476–1487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourdet, C., Giombi, K. C., Kosa, K., Wiley, J., & Cates, S. (2017, May). How Four U.S. States Are Regulating Recreational Marijuana Edibles. International Journal of Drug Policy, 43, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C. (2004). The Dependent Variable Problem within the Study of Welfare State Retrenchment: Defining the Problem and Looking for Solutions. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 6(1), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1989). The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1990). Policy Paradigms, Experts, and the State: The Case of Macroeconomic Policy-Making in Britain. In S. Brooks & A. G. Gagnon (Eds.), Social Scientists, Policy, and the State (pp. 53–78). Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy Making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, M. T. (1992). Incrementalism and Public Policy. Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofferbert, R. I. (1974). The Study of Public Policy. Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., & Howlett, M. (eds.). (2015). Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., & Howlett, M. Reflections on Our Understanding of Policy Paradigms and Policy Change. Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice. Eds., J. Hogan & M. Howlett. 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1986). The Tools of Government. Chatham House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2007). Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades. Governance, 20(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00347.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (1994). Policy Paradigms and Policy Change: Lessons from the Old and New Canadian Policies Towards Aboriginal Peoples. Policy Studies Journal, 22(4), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1994.tb01494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(1), 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Del Rio, P. (2015). The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(5), 1233–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15610059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Rayner, J. (2014). The Elements of Effective Program Design: A Two-Level Analysis. Politics and Governance, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v2i2.23
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2019). Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments (2nd Edition ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2007). Re-Visiting the New Orthodoxy of Policy Dynamics: The Dependent Variable and Re-Aggregation Problems in the Study of Policy Change. Canadian Political Science Review, 1(2), 50–62.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Migone, A. (2011, February). Charles Lindblom Is Alive and Well and Living in Punctuated Equilibrium Land. Policy and Society, 30(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2020). Studying Public Policy: Principles and Processes (Fourth edition ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v1i2.95
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Governing for the Long Term: Democracy and the Politics of Investment (1st ed. ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kekez, A., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (eds.). (2020). Collaboration in Public Service Delivery: Promise and Pitfalls. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1974). Second Thoughts on Paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories (pp. 459–482). University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhner, S. (2007). Country-Level Comparisons of Welfare State Change Measures: Another Facet of the Dependent Variable Problem Within the Comparative Analysis of the Welfare State. Journal of European Social Policy, 17(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928707071875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S. (2018). Advancing Universal Health Coverage: What Developing Countries Can Learn from the Korean Experience? In Universal Health Coverage Study Series (Vol. 33). The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kyeong Jang, H. (2018). Mooncare: South Korea’s Proposed Health Insurance Reform in Full. Korea Expose. May 31, 2018 https://www.koreaexpose.com/mooncare-south-korea-proposed-health-insurance-reform/
   Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D., Arts, B., Kamstra, J., & Ooijevaar, J. (2009). Leaders and Laggards in Environmental Policy: A Quantitative Analysis of Domestic Policy Outputs. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 677–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760902983283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1989). Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00007960
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2000). Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathauer, I., & Xu, K. (2009). An analysis of the health financing system of the Republic Of Korea and options to strengthen health financing performance. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/health_financing/documents/hsfr_e_09-korea.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Monios, J. (2016, October). Policy Transfer or Policy Churn? Institutional Isomorphism and Neoliberal Convergence in the Transport Sector. Environment and Planning A, 48(1), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15597907
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. (2011). Academic Accounts of Policy Experience. In H. Colebatch, R. Hoppe, & M. Noordegraaf (Eds.), Working for Policy (pp. 45–67). University of Amsterdam Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). OECD Health Statistics. https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. J., & Pemberton, H. (2004). Learning and Change in 20th-Century British Economic Policy. Governance, 17(3), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00252.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2003). How Types of Goods and Property Rights Jointly Affect Collective Action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803015003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009). Beyond Markets and states: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. Nobel Prize Lecture. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/7707/ostrom.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2011, February). Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petek, A., Baketa, N., Kekez, A., Kovačić, M., Munta, M., Petković, K., Šinko, M., & Zgurić, B. (2021). Unboxing the Vague Notion of Policy Goals: Comparison of Croatian Public Policies. European Policy Analysis, 7(2), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1106
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2000, January). Policy Instruments and Public Management: Bridging the Gaps. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024265
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., Ravinet, P., Howlett, M., Capano, G., Mukherjee, I., & Hsuan Chou, M. (2018). Designing for Policy Effectiveness: Defining and Understanding a Concept. In Elements Series. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh, M., & Bali, A. S. (2021). Health Policy in Asia: A Policy Design Approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichardt, K., & Rogge, K. (2016). How the policy mix impacts innovation: Findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. (1976). The Dynamics of Public Policy: A Comparative Analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2/3), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., & Pelkey, N. (1987). Incorporating Multiple Actors and Guidance Instruments into Models of Regulatory Policymaking: An Advocacy Coalition Framework. Administration & Society, 19(2), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539978701900205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2002). The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance (pp. 1–47). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S., & Seubert, S. (2014, September). The Innovativeness of National Policy Portfolios – Climate Policy Change in Austria, Germany, and the UK. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 860–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.924206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2000). Policy Networks and Advocacy Coalitions: Explaining Policy Change and Stability in UK Industrial Pollution Policy? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1068/c9810j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. M., Gallagher, E. A., Pollard, S. J. T., Rocks, S. A., Smith, H. M., Leinster, P., & Angus, A. J. (2019, January 1). Environmental Regulation in Transition: Policy Officials’ Views of Regulatory Instruments and Their Mapping to Environmental Risks. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 811–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, A., & Lauber, V. (2012, June 1). Assessing the Performance of Renewable Electricity Support Instruments. Energy Policy, 45, 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veselý, A., & Ivan, P. (2021). Decision Makers’ Preferences of Policy Instruments. European Policy Analysis, 7(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1082
   Google Scholar
• Weir, M. (1992). Ideas and the Politics of Bounded Innovation. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (pp. 188–216). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wesley, J. J., & Salomons, G. (2019). Cannabis Legalization and the Machinery of Government. Canadian Public Administration, 62(4), 573–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO 2021 WHO National Health Accounts. https://apps.who.int/nha/database/Select/Indicators/en
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, M., & Howlett, M. (2014). The Politics of Policy Anomalies: Bricolage and the Hermeneutics of Paradigms. Critical Policy Studies, 8(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2014.901175
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Paradigm Construction and the Politics of Policy Anomalies. In J. Hogan & M. Howlett (Eds.), Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice (pp. 101–115). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R. S. (2006). The Dynamics of Incrementalism: Subsystems, Politics, and Public Lands. Policy Studies Journal, 34(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00153.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar