0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research article

Empowering women in academia: navigating institutional dynamics, gender roles, and personal pursuits among female researchers in Norwegian higher education

ORCID Icon, , &
Received 08 Feb 2024, Accepted 28 Jul 2024, Published online: 09 Aug 2024

References

  • Aksnes, D. W., Rorstad, K., Piro, F., & Sivertsen, G. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large‐scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21486
  • Avant, G. R., & Knutsen, K. P. (1993). Understanding cultural differences: Janteloven and social conformity in Norway. ETC: A Review of General Semantics. 50(4), 449–460.
  • Ballon, P. (2018). A structural equation model of female empowerment. The Journal of Development Studies, 54(8), 1303–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1414189
  • Bao, L., & Tian, X. (2022). Climbing the academic ladder: Chinese women academics seeking recognition on the way to becoming professors. International Journal of Educational Development, 91, 102597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102597
  • Barrett, L., & Barrett, P. (2011). Women and academic workloads: Career slow lane or cul-de-sac? Higher Education, 61(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9329-3
  • Batliwala, S. (1994). The meaning of women’s empowerment: new concepts from action. In G. Sen, A. Germain, & L. C. Chen (Eds.), Population policies reconsidered : health, empowerment, and rights (pp. 127–138). Harvard University Press. https://catalog.nlm.nih.gov/permalink/01NLM_INST/1o1phhn/alma9910617553406676
  • Bergman, S., & Rustad, L. M. (2013). The Nordic region-a step closer to gender balance in research? Joint Nordic strategies and measures to promote gender balance among researchers in academia. Nordic Council of Ministers.
  • Bromgard, G., Trafimow, D., & Linn, C. (2014). Janteloven and the expression of pride in Norway and the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154(5), 375–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.914884
  • Casey, C., Skibnes, R., & Pringle, J. K. (2011). Gender equality and corporate governance: Policy strategies in Norway and New Zealand. Gender, Work, & Organization, 18(6), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00514.x
  • Cornwall, A. (2016). Women’s empowerment: What works? Journal of International Development, 28(3), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3210
  • Crawford, C., Burns, R., & McNamara, R. H. (2012). Promotion to full professor: Moving beyond tenure and associate professorship. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 23(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2011.645491
  • Cubillo, L., & Brown, M. (2003). Women into educational leadership and management: International differences? Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230310474421
  • Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (2008). The thin end of the wedge: Foreign women professors as double strangers in academia. Gender, Work, & Organization, 15(3), 235–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00392.x
  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
  • Gornitzka, A., & Langfeldt, L. (2009). Borderless knowledge: Understanding the“new” internationalisation of research and higher education in Norway (Vol. 22). Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Griffin, K. A. (2020). Institutional Barriers, Strategies, and Benefits to Increasing the Representation of Women and Men of Color in the Professoriate: Looking Beyond the Pipeline. In L. W. Perna (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (1st ed., Vol. 35, pp. 277–349). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31365-4_4
  • Hentschel, T., Heilman, M. E., & Peus, C. V. (2019). The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: A current look at men’s and women’s characterizations of others and themselves. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011
  • Hill, C., Miller, K., Benson, K., & Handley, G. (2016). Barriers and bias: The status of women in leadership. American Association of University Women.
  • HKDIR. (2023). Status report for higher education 2023 (tilstandsrapport for høyere utdanning 2023).
  • Jayaweera, S. (1997). Women, education and empowerment in asia. Gender and Education, 9(4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540259721169
  • Johansson, M., & Śliwa, M. (2014). Gender, foreignness and academia: An intersectional analysis of the experiences of foreign women academics in UK business schools. Gender, Work, & Organization, 21(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12009
  • Karl, M. (1995). Women and empowerment: Participation and decision making.
  • Khalid, S., Gao, C., Orynbek, G., & Tadesse, E. (2024). Constructing a women-friendly academic ecology: Understanding the push and pull forces on Pakistani women academics’ research productivity. Studies in Higher Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2322099
  • Lamichhane, B. D. (2020). Microfinance for women empowerment: A review of best practices. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 1(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijmss.v1i1.34504
  • Laursen, S., & Austin, A. E. (2020). Building gender equity in the academy: Institutional strategies for change. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Laws, J. L. (1975). The psychology of tokenism: An analysis. Sex Roles, 1(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287213
  • Lee, M., & Koh, J. (2001). Is empowerment really a new concept? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4), 684–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/713769649
  • Liu, D. (2021). Othering and being othered: Experiences and reflections of Chinese female PhD graduates in cross-cultural job search. Chinese Education & Society, 54(3–4), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2021.1958192
  • Liu, D., & Solheim, M. C. (2023). Tuition fees for international students in Norway: A policy-debate. Beijing International Review of Education, 5(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1163/25902539-05030005
  • Lund, R. (2020). Becoming a professor requires saying ‘no’: Merging equality and quality agendas in a Norwegian gender balance project. In H. Smith, C. Henry, H. Etzkowitz, & A. Poulovassilis (Eds.), Gender, science and innovation (pp. 35–57). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Malhotra, A., & Schuler, S. R. (2005). Women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. In D. Narayan-Parker (Ed.), Measuring empowerment: cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 71–88). World Bank.
  • Meyer, M., Cimpian, A., & Leslie, S.-J. (2015). Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00235
  • Michelsen, S., & Stensaker, B. (2011). Students and the governance of higher education in Norway. Tertiary Education & Management, 17(3), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.586047
  • Moratti, S. (2021). A woman’s place is in the ‘home’? gender-specific hiring patterns in academia in gender-equal Norway. Journal of Sociology, 57(4), 916–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783320960530
  • NAGE (Norwegian Act Relating to Gender Equality). (2005). http://www.regjeringen.no/en/doc/laws/Acts/the-act-relating-to-gender-equality-the-.html?id=454568
  • Narayan, D. (2005). Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (1 ed.). The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-6057-4
  • NAUUC (Norwegian Act Related to University and University Colleges). (2005). http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/kilde/kd/reg/2006/0031/ddd/pdfv/273037-loven_higher_education_act_norway_010405.pdf
  • Nguyen, T. L. H. (2013). Barriers to and facilitators of female Deans’ career advancement in higher education: An exploratory study in Vietnam. Higher Education, 66(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9594-4
  • Nielsen, M. W. (2016). Limits to meritocracy? Gender in academic recruitment and promotion processes. Science & Public Policy, 43(3), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv052
  • Nielsen, M. W. (2017). Scandinavian approaches to gender equality in academia: A comparative study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(3), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1147066
  • NRC (The Research Council of Norway). (2023). Gender balance and gender perspectives. https://www.forskningsradet.no/en/research-policy-strategy/gender-balance-perspectives/
  • Odhiambo, G. (2011). Women and higher education leadership in Kenya: A critical analysis. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 33(6), 667–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2011.621192
  • O’Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., Waugaman, C., & Jackson, R. (2017). Asked more often: Gender differences in faculty workload in research universities and the work interactions that shape them. American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1154–1186. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217716767
  • Panda, S. M. (2000). Women’s empowerment through NGO interventions: A framework for assessment. Social Change, 30(3–4), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/004908570003000405
  • Pereznieto, P., & Taylor, G. (2014). A review of approaches and methods to measure economic empowerment of women and girls. Gender & Development, 22(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2014.920976
  • Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506982
  • Probert, B. (2005). ‘I just couldn’t fit it in’: Gender and unequal outcomes in academic careers. Gender, Work, & Organization, 12(1), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00262.x
  • Reitzes, D. C., & Mutran, E. (1980). Significant others and self conceptions: Factors influencing educational expectations and academic performance. Sociology of Education, 53(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112576
  • Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
  • Rodwell, C. M. (1996). An analysis of the concept of empowerment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(2), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb02672.x
  • Roos, P. A., & Gatta, M. L. (2009). Gender (in) equity in the academy: Subtle mechanisms and the production of inequality. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 27(3), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2009.04.005
  • She Figures. (2018). She figures 2015 - gender in research and innovation. [data set]. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. http://data.europa.eu/88u/dataset/she-figures-2015-gender-in-research-and-innovation ( Original work published 2016).
  • She Figures. (2021). She figures 2021 – gender in research and innovation – statistics and indicators. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/06090
  • Silander, C., Haake, U., Lindberg, L., & Riis, U. (2022). Nordic research on gender equality in academic careers: A literature review. European Journal of Higher Education, 12(1), 72–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1895858
  • Statistics Norway. (2023). Statistics Norway. Statistikkbanken, Research personnel. https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/list/fouoff/
  • Steine, F. S., Gunnes, H., & Wendt, K. (2020). Gender balance among researchers in Norwegian academia. NIFU Insight, (20). https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2722116
  • Tang, L., & Horta, H. (2021). Women academics in Chinese universities: A historical perspective. Higher Education, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00669-1
  • Tariq, S., & Sangmi, M. (2018). Microfinance and women empowerment: A brief review of literature. Pacific Business Review International, 11(3), 77–83.
  • Teigen, M., & Wängnerud, L. (2009). Tracing gender equality cultures: Elite perceptions of gender equality in Norway and Sweden. Politics & Gender, 5(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09000026
  • Thun, C. (2020). Excellent and gender equal? Academic motherhood and ‘gender blindness’ in Norwegian academia. Gender, Work, & Organization, 27(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12368
  • Tietze, S. (2008). The work of management academics: An English language perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 27(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.05.002
  • van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Slaying the seven-headed dragon: The quest for gender change in academia. Gender, Work, & Organization, 19(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00566.x
  • Van Veelen, R., & Derks, B. (2022). Academics as agentic superheroes: Female academics’ lack of fit with the agentic stereotype of success limits their career advancement. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(3), 748–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12515
  • Varkey, P., Kureshi, S., & Lesnick, T. (2010). Empowerment of women and its association with the health of the community. Journal of Women’s Health, 19(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1444
  • Webster, S., Lewis, J., & Brown, A. (2013). Considerations in qualitative research. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, Nicholls C. M. & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Wendt, K., Gunnes, H., & Aksnes, D. W. (2022). International migration of researchers and gender imbalance in academia—The case of Norway. Scientometrics, 127(12), 7575–7591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04365-y
  • Yoder, J. D., & Sinnett, L. M. (1985). Is it all in the numbers? A case study of tokenism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(3), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1985.tb00890.x