Material culture and consciousness: a thought experiment

References

• Alberti, B., 2016. “Archaeologies of Risk and Wonder.” Archaeological Dialogues 23, 138–145. 2 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203816000179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberti, B., and Y. Marshall, 2009. “Animating Archaeology: Local Theories and Conceptually Open-ended Methodologies.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19, 344–356. 3 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Androshchuk, F., 2010. “The Gift to Men and the Gift to the Gods: Weapon Sacrifices and the Circulation of Swords in Viking Age Society.” In C. Theune, F. Biermann, R. Struwe, and G. Jeute (edited by), Zwischen Fjorden und Steppe, 263–275. Rahden: Leidorf.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. C., 2016. “Archaeology after Interpretation. Returning Humanity to Archaeological Theory.” Archaeological Dialogues 23, 133–137. 2 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203816000167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, G., 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Bienkowski, P., 2012. “Archaeological Knowledge, Animist Knowledge, and Appropriation of the Ancient Dead.” In I. J. M. Robertson (edited by), Heritage From Below, 29–58. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, T., 2011. “Living on the Edge: Making and Moving Iron from the ‘Outside’ in Anglo-Saxon England.” Landscape History 32, 5–23. 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/01433768.2011.10594648
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, R., 2017. A Geography of Offerings: Deposits of Valuables in the Landscapes of Ancient Europe. Oxford: Oxbow.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. B., and R. H. Thouless, 1965. “Animistic Thought in Civilized Adults.” Journal of Genetic Psychology 107, 33–42. 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1965.10532760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunning, S., 2017. “Crossing Edges? ‘Person-like’ Swords in Anglo-Saxon England”, in C. Orsini and S. Semple (edited by), Life on the Edge: Social, Political and Religious Frontiers in Early Medieval Europe, 409–418. Proceedings of 63 Internationales Sachsensymposion, Neue Studien zur Sachsenforschung 5. Hannover: Braunschweigisches Landesmuseum.
   Google Scholar
• Brunning, S., 2019. The Sword in Early Medieval Northern Europe: Experience, Identity, Representation. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brüntrup, G., and L. Jaskolla (eds), 2016a. Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brüntrup, G., and L. Jaskolla, 2016b. “Intruduction.” In G. Brüntrup and L. Jaskolla (edited by), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, 1–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burstrӧm, N. M., 2015. “Things of Quality: Possessions and Animated Objects in the Scandinavian Iron Age.” In A. Klevnӓs and C. Hedenstierna-Jonson (edited by), Own and Be Owned: Archaeological Approaches to the Concept of Possession, 23–48. Stockholm: Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D., 2016. “The Combination Problem for Panpsychism.” In G. Brüntrup and L. Jaskolla (edited by), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, 179–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooney, G., 2015. “Material Culture.” In A. Gardner, M. Lake, and U. Sommer (edited by), The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Theory, 1–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, R., 1965. Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry and Meteorology. Trans. J. Olcamp. New York: Library of the Liberal Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P., 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Guardamino, M., and C. Morgan, 2019. “Human, Transhuman, Posthuman Digital Archaeologies: An Introduction.” European Journal of Archaeology 22, 320–323. 3 https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2019.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feynman, R. P., R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, 1965. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 3: Quantum Mechanics. Boston: Addison-Wesley
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., 2004. The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gansum, T., 2004. “Role the Bones: From Iron to Steel.” Norwegian Archaeological Review 37, 41–57. 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650410001199
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey-Smith, P., 2016. Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness. London: William Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, P., 2017. Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, P., W. Seager, and S. Allen-Hermanson, 2017. “Panpsychism.” In E. N. Zalta (edited by), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/panpsychism/
   Google Scholar
• Gosden, C., 2005. “What Do Objects Want?” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12, 193–211. 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-005-6928-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosden, C., and Y. Marshall 1999. “The Cultural Biography of Objects”, World Archaeology 31, 169–178. 2 https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1999.9980439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gribbin, J., 1984. In Search of Schrödinger’s Cat. London: Corgi.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, M., 2015. ““Therefore Their Parts Resemble Humans, for They Feel that They are People”: Ontological Flux in San Myth, Cosmology and Belief.” Hunter Gatherer Research 1, 277–315. 3 https://doi.org/10.3828/hgr.2015.16
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, H. P., and H. Weiss, 2013. “Introduction: Biographies, Travels and Itineraries of Things.” In H. P. Hahn and H. Weiss (edited by), Mobility, Meaning and Transformations of Things: Shifting Contexts of Material Culture through Time and Space, 1–14. Oxford: Oxbow.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, O. J. T., 2017. “Assemblages and Scale in Archaeology.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 27, 127–139 1 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, O. J. T., and Robb, J., 2012. “Multiple Ontologies and the Problem of the Body in History.” American Anthropologist 114, 668–679. 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01513.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, G. 2005. Animism: Respecting the Living World. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Henare, A., M. Holbraad, and S. Wastell (eds), 2007. Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hornborg, A., 2006. “Animism, Fetishism and Objectivism as Strategies for Knowing (Or Not Knowing) the World.” Ethnos 71, 21–32. 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840600603129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskins, J. 1998. Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People’s Lives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T., 2006. “Rethinking the Animate, Re-animating Thought.” Ethnos 71, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840600603111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T., 2014. “Is There Life Amidst the Ruins?” Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1, 231–235. 2 https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v1i2.26675
   Google Scholar
• Insoll, T., 2011. “Animism and Totemism.” In T. Insoll (edited by), ‘The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion’, 1004–1016. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. M., and N. Boivin, 2010. “The Malice of Inanimate Objects: Material Agency.” In D. Hicks and M. C. Beaudry (edited by), The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, 333–351. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. M., M. Díaz-Guardamino, and R. J. Crellin, 2016. “From Artefact Biographies to ‘Multiple Objects’: A New Analysis of the Decorated Plaques of the Irish Sea Region”. Norwegian Archaeological Review 49, 113–133 2 https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2016.1227359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy, J. 2009. “Revigorating Object Biography: Reproducing the Drama of Object Lives.” World Archaeology 41, 540–556. 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240903345530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy, J., 2015. ”Things in Process”: Biographies of Iron Age Pits.” In D. Boschung, P. A. Kreuz, and T. Kienlin (edited by), Biography of Objects: Aspekte Eines Kultur Historischen Konzepts, 125–141. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, R. A., and S. D. Gillespie, (edited by), 2015. Things in Motion: Object Itineraries in Anthropological Practice. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press
   Google Scholar
• Knappett, C., 2004. “The Affordances of Things: A post-Gibsonian Perspective on the Relationality of Mind and Matter.” In E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, and C. Renfrew (edited by), Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World, 43–51. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Knappett, C., 2013. “Imprints as Punctuations of Material Itineraries.” In H. P. Hahn and H. Weiss (edited by), Mobility, Meaning and Transformations of Things: Shifting Contexts of Material Culture through Time and Space, 37–49. Oxford: Oxbow.
   Google Scholar
• Kopytoff, I. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as a Process.” In A. Appadurai (edited by), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lillios, K. T., 1999. “Objects of Memory: The Ethnography and Archaeology of Heirlooms.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 6, 235–262. 3 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021999319447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrøm, T. C., 2015. “Agency ‘In Itself’. A Discussion of Inanimate, Animal and Human Agency.” Archaeological Dialogues 22, 207–238. 2 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203815000264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, G., 2012: Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malafouris, L., 2004. “The Cognitive Basis of Material Engagement: Where Brain, Body and Culture Conflate.” In E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, and C. Renfrew (edited by), Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World, 53–62. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Malafouris, L., and C. Renfrew (eds), 2010. The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M., [1945] 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nagasawa, Y., and K. Wage, 2016. “Panpsychism and Priority Cosmopsychism.” In G. Brüntrup and L. Jaskolla (edited by), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, 1–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, T., 1974. “What Is It like to Be a Bat?” The Philosophical Review 83, 435–450. 4 https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, B., 2003. “Material Culture after Text: Re-membering Things”. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36, 87–104. 2 https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, B., M. Shanks, T. Webmoor, and C. Witmore, 2012: Archaeology. The Discipline of Things. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M., 2016. Seeing with the Hands: Blindness, Vision and Touch after Descartes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paz, J., 2017. Nonhuman Voices in Anglo-Saxon Literature and Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, M., 2013. “The Spirit of the Sword and Spear.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 23, 55–67. 1 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774313000048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, D., E. Sebo, and K. Hughes, 2019. “A Double-edged Sword: Swords, Bodies, and Personhood in Early Medieval Archaeology and Literature.” European Journal of Archaeology 22, 542–566. 4 https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2019.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seager, W. E., 1995. “Consciousness, Information, and Panpsychism.” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 272–288.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, M. G., 2015. “The Cuckoo and the Magpie: The Building Culture of the Anglo-Saxon Church.” In M. Clegg Hyer and G. R. Owen-Crocker (edited by), The Material Culture of the Built Environment in Anglo-Saxon England, 92–116. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, M. G., 2017. “The House of Stilled Time: Stasis and Eternity in Anglo-Saxon Churches.” In M. J. D. Bintley, M. Locker, M. Symons, and M. Wellesley (edited by), Stasis in the Medieval West? Questioning Change and Continuity, 127–142. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, M. G., 2020. “Capturing the Spirit of Singular Places: A Biographical Approach to Historic Building Recording.” Post-Medieval Archaeology 54, 18–41. 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2020.1750142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaviro, S., 2015. “The Consequences of Panpsychism.” In R. Grusin (edited by), The Nonhuman Turn, 19–44. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skrbina, D., 2017. Panpsychism in the West (revised edition). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Southgate, C., 1999. God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion. London: T. and T. Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, I., 2006. British Iron Age Swords and Scabbards. London: British Museum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, G. 1994. Mental Reality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, G., 2006. “Realistic Monism – Why Physicalism Entails Panpsychism.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 13, 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift, E., 2012. “Object Biography, Re-use and Recycling in the Late to Post-Roman Transition Period and Beyond: Rings Made from Romano-British Bracelets.” Britannia 43, 167–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X12000281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., 2004. Archaeology and Modernity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Witmore, C., 2007. “Symmetrical Archaeology: Excerpts of a Manifesto.” World Archaeology 39, 546–562 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240701679411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welton, A. J., 2016. “Encounters with Iron: An Archaeometallurgical Reassessment of Early Anglo-Saxon Spearheads and Knives.” Archaeological Journal 173, 206-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2016.1175891
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D., 2019. “Crafters of Kingship: Smiths, Elite Power, and Gender in Early Medieval Europe.” Medieval Archaeology 63, 271–297. 2 https://doi.org/10.1080/00766097.2019.1670922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. W., 2010. “Tasting Misery among Snakes: The Situation of Smiths in Anglo-Saxon Settlements.” Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 20, 131–136.
   Google Scholar