Exploring materiality and sensory experience through Viking Age reenactment

References

• Aalto, I. 2020. “Possibilities of Public Excavations in the Urban Context.” Fennoscandia Archaeologica XXXVII:147–164. https://journal.fi/fennoscandiaarchaeologica/article/view/126583.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, V., J. Lamb, and J. Tomann. 2020. “Introduction: What Is Reenactment Studies?” In The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies, edited by V. Agnew, J. Lamb, and J. Tomann, 1–10. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. P., and M. Alexander. 2007. Museums in Motion. An Introduction to the History and Functions of Museums. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. 1982. “Living History: Simulating Everyday Life in Living Museums.” American Quarterly 34 (3): 290–306. https://doi.org/10.2307/2712780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Androshchuk, F. 2018. “Female Viking Revisited.” Viking and Medieval Scandinavia 14:47–60. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.VMS.5.116389.
   Google Scholar
• Appelgren-Kivalo, H. 1907. Suomalaisia pukuja nuoremmalta rautakaudelta – Finnische Trachten aus der jüngeren Eisenzeit. Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Auslander, M. 2013. “Touching the Past: Materializing Time in Traumatic ‘Living History’ Reenactments.” Signs and Society 1 (1): 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1086/670167.
   Google Scholar
• Brædder, A. 2020. “Expertise and Amateurism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies, edited by V. Agnew, J. Lamb, and J. Tomann, 74–78. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brædder, A., K. Esmark, T. Kruse, C. Nielsen, and A. Warring. 2017. “Doing Pasts: Authenticity from the reenactors’ Perspective.” Rethinking History 21 (2): 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2017.1315969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, E. M. 1994. “Abraham Lincoln as Authentic Reproduction: A Critique of Postmodernism.” American Anthropologist 96 (2): 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.2.02a00070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederlund, C. O. 2011. “The Modern Myth of the Viking.” Journal of Maritime Archaeology 6 (1): 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-011-9079-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, J. 1979. Experimental Archaeology. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. 2004. “The Use and Abuse of Historical Reenactment: Thoughts on Recent Trends in Public History.” Criticism 43 (3): 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2005.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Croix, S. 2015. “The Vikings, Victims of Their Own Success? A Selective View on Viking Research and Its Dissemination.” Danish Journal of Archaeology 4 (1): 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2015.1133944.
   Google Scholar
• Daugbjerg, M. 2018. “Re-Enactment and Engagement.” In The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences, edited by S. L. Varela, 1465–1469. Vol. III. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Day, J. 2013. “Introduction.” In Making Senses of the Past: Toward a Sensory Archaeology, edited by J. Day, 1–31. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, D. 2020. “Living History.” In The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies, edited by V. Agnew, J. Lamb, and J. Tomann, 120–124. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Demant, I. 2009. “Principles for reconstruction of costumes and archaeological textiles.” In Textiles y Museología. Aspectos Sobre El Estudio, Análysis y Exposición de Los Textiles Antiguos y de Los Instrumenta Textilia–Clothing and Identities New Perspectives on Textiles in the Roman Empire, edited by C. Alfaro, M. Tellenbach, and R. Ferrero, 143–153. Valencia: Artes Gráficas Soler.
   Google Scholar
• Dupré, S., A. Harris, J. Kursell, P. Lulof, and M. Stols-Witlox. 2020. “Introduction.” In Reconstruction, Replication and Re-Enactment in the Humanities and Social Sciences, edited by S. Dupré, A. Harris, J. Kursell, P. Lulof, and M. Stols-Witlox, 9–34. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fahlander, F.: & A. Kjellström, eds. 2010. Making Sense of Things. Archaeologies of Sensory Perception. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 53. Stockholm University: Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Gaitán Ammann, F. 2022. “Trading Tones: Exploring the Soundscape of Human Trafficking in Spanish Colonial Panama.” Historical Archaeology 56 (2): 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41636-022-00342-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gapps, S. 2009. “Mobile Monuments: A View of Historical Reenactment and Authenticity from Inside the Costume Cupboard of History.” Rethinking History 13 (3): 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642520903091159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardeła, L. 2021. “Shield-Maidens and Norse Amazons Reconsidered Women and Weapons in Viking Age Burials in Norway.” Viking 84 (1): 143–166. https://doi.org/10.5617/viking.9047.
   Google Scholar
• Good, I. 2001. “Archaeological Textiles: A Review of Current Research.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30 (1): 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.209.
   Google Scholar
• Graff, S. R. 2020. “Archaeology of Cuisine and Cooking.” Annual Review of Anthropology 49 (1): 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-045734.
   Google Scholar
• Halewood, C., and K. Hannam. 2001. “Viking Heritage Tourism: Authenticity and Commodification.” Annals of Tourism Research 28 (3): 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(00)00076-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, G. 2015. “Selective Authenticity: Civil War Reenactors and Credible Reenactments.” Historical Sociology 29 (3): 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilakis, Y. 2002. “Past As Oral History: Towards an Archaeology of the Senses.” In Thinking Through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality, edited by Y. Hamilakis, M. Pluciennik, and S. Tarlow, 121–136. London, UK, New York, USA: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilakis, Y. 2011. “Archaeologies of the Senses.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion, edited by T. Insoll, 208–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilakis, Y. 2013. “Afterword: Eleven Theses on the Archaeology of the Senses.” In Making Senses of the Past: Toward a Sensory Archaeology, edited by J. Day, 409–419. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, R., and W. Saxton. 1988. “Dyssimulation: Reflexivity, Narrative, and the Quest for Authenticity in ‘Living History’.” Cultural Anthropology 3 (3): 242–260. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1988.3.3.02a00020.
   Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., and C. Halewood. 2006. “European Viking Themed Festivals: An Expression of Identity.” Journal of Heritage Tourism 1 (1): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17438730608668463.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenstierna-Jonson, C., A. Kjellström, T. Zachrisson, M. Krzewińska, V. Sobrado, N. Price, T. Günther, M. Jakobsson, A. Götherström, and J. Storå. 2017. “A Female Viking Warrior Confirmed by Genomics.” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 164 (4) 4: 853–860. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodder, I. 1994. “The Interpretation of Documents and Material Culture.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 393–402. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Holtorf, C. 2014. “The Time travellers’ Tools of the Trade: Some Trends at Lejre.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 20 (7–8): 782–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2013.818568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. J. 2007. “Acting the Part: ‘Living history’ As a Serious Leisure Pursuit.” Leisure Studies 23 (4): 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261436042000231664.
   Google Scholar
• Huvila, I., C. Dallas, M. Toumpouri, and D. Enqvist. 2022. “Archaeological Practices and Societal Challenges.” Open Archaeology 8 (1): 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesch, J. 2021. “Women, War and Words: A Verbal Archaeology of Shield-Maidens.” Viking 84 (1): 127–142. https://doi.org/10.5617/viking.9054.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. 2020. “Performance and Performativity.” In The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies, edited by V. Agnew, J. Lamb, and J. Tomann, 169–172. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kobiałka, D. 2013. “The Mask(s) and Transformers of Historical Reenactment: Material Culture and Contemporary Vikings.” Current Swedish Archaeology 21 (1): 141–161. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2013.12.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. 2008. “Förbjöd kyrkan den vikingatida kvinnodräkten?” Populär arkeologi 1:2008.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. 2020. “Asian Silk in Scandinavian Viking Age Graves: Based on the Boat- and Chamber Graves in the Eastern Mälar Valley.” In Asia and Scandinavia – New perspectives on the Early Medieval Silk Roads, edited by E. Myrdal, 107–148. Stockholm: Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtosalo-Hilander, P.-L. 1982a. “Luistari I.The Graves. “ In Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistyksen Aikakauskirja, Vol. 82. Helsinki: Finnish Antiquarian Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtosalo-Hilander, P.-L. 1982b. “Luistari II. The Artefacts. “In Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistyksen Aikakauskirja, Vol. 82. Helsinki: Finnish Antiquarian Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtosalo-Hilander, P.-L. 1982c. “Luistari III. A Burial-Ground Reflecting the Finnish Viking Age Society.” In Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistyksen Aikakauskirja, 3. Vol. 82. Helsinki: Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistys.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtosalo-Hilander, P.-L. 2000. Luistari IV. A History of Weapons and Ornaments. Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistyksen Aikakauskirja 107. Helsinki: Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistys.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtosalo-Hilander, P.-L. 2001. “Euran puku ja sen edeltäjät.” In Euran puku ja sen edeltäjät, edited by P.-L. Lehtosalo-Hilander, S. Sarkki, and L. Tomanterä, 5–36. Eura: Euran Muinaispukutoimikunta.
   Google Scholar
• Levent, N., and A. Pascual-Leone, eds. 2014. The Multisensory Museum: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Touch, Sound, Smell, Memory, and Space. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefied.
   Google Scholar
• Maaranen, P. 2023. “Kuinka emäntä odotti ja imetti? Käytännön kokeiluja ja kokemuksia äitiydestä rautakauden naisen puvussa. Hur väntade husmor barn och hur ammade hon? Praktiska experiment och erfarenheter av moderskap i en kvinnodräkt från järnåldern.” In Luihin ja ytimiin: Tutkimuksia ja tulkintoja Euran Luistarin kalmistosta - I märg och ben: Studier och tolkningar kring Luistari gravfält i Eura, edited by H. Etu-Sihvola and U. Moilanen. & J. Therus, 197–207. Turku: Sigillum.
   Google Scholar
• Marila, M. 2017. “Vagueness and Archaeological Interpretation: A Sensuous Approach to Archaeological Knowledge Formation Through Finds Analysis.” Norwegian Archaeological Review 50 (1): 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metheny, K. B. 2022. “Connecting Archaeological Practice with the Senses and Past Bodily Experience: Introduction to ‘Sensory Engagement in Historical Archaeology’.” Historical Archaeology 56 (2): 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41636-022-00341-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moilanen, M. 2010. “Katsaus korjausten ja käytön jälkiin Suomen rautakauden miekkalöydöissä.” Muinaistutkija 2010 (4): 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen, U., and J. Therus. 2023. “Tuokiokuvia rautakaudelta – Menneisyyden elävöitys, ennallistukset ja autenttisuuden ongelmat. Ögonblicksbilder från Järnåldern – reenactment, rekonstruktioner och problemet med autenticet.” In Luihin ja ytimiin: Tutkimuksia ja tulkintoja Euran Luistarin kalmistosta - I märg och ben: Studier och tolkningar kring Luistari gravfält i Eura, edited by H. Etu-Sihvola, U. Moilanen, and J. Therus, 197–207. Turku: Sigillum.
   Google Scholar
• Moscardo, G. 1996. “Mindful Visitors: Heritage and Tourism.” Annals of Tourism Research 23 (2): 376–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(95)00068-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pälsi, S. 1928. “Puvustoaineksia Maskun Humikkalan kalmistosta.” Suomen Museo 1928:71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Pellini, J. R., A. Zarankin, and M. A. Salerno, eds. 2015. Coming to Senses: Topics in Sensory Archaeology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Price, N., C. Hedenstierna-Jonson, T. Zachrisson, A. Kjellström, J. Storå, M. Krzewińska, T. Günther, V. Sobrado, M. Jakobsson, and A. Götherström. 2019. “Viking Warrior Women? Reassessing Birka Chamber Grave Bj.581.” Antiquity 93 (367): 181–198. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye, E. 2008. The Power of Touch: Handling Objects in Museums and Heritage Contexts. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainio, R. 2014. “Iron Age Jingling.” Finnish Music Quarterly 2014 (2): 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rainio, R. J. 2006. “Jingle Bells, Bells and Bell Pendants – Listening to the Iron Age Finland.” Tautosakos darbai 32:117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, P. J. 1999. “The Nature of Experiment in Archaeology.” In Experiment and Design: Archaeological Studies in Honour of John Coles, edited by A. F. Harding, 156–162. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
   Google Scholar
• Riikonen, J., and J. Ruohonen, Eds. 2023. Ravattulan muinaispuku: Tutkimukset ja valmistusohjeet. Turku: Suomen muinaistutkimuksen tuki ry.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D., G. Saxena, F. Correia, and P. Deutz. 2017. “Archaeological Tourism: A Creative Approach.” Annals of Tourism Research 67:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudebeck, E. 2008. “Ales stenar lider skeppsbrott i ämbetsmannapekoral: Skyltar, språk och och kommunikation vid en kontroversiell fornlämning.” In Gropar & monument: En vänbok till Dag Widholm, edited by J. Goldhahn, 27–52. Högskolan i Kalmar: Humanvetenskapliga institutionen.
   Google Scholar
• Schöbel, G. 2019. “Experimental Archaeology.” In The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies, edited by V. Agnew, J. Lamb, and J. Tomann, 67–73. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, M., and R. H. McGuire. 1996. “The Craft of Archaeology.” American Antiquity 61 (1): 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002731600050046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeates, R., and J. Day, eds. 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Sensory Archaeology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. 2007. “Producing Sense, Consuming Sense, Making Sense: Perils and Prospects for Sensory History.” Journal of Social History 40 (4): 841–858. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2007.0116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. 2014. “Citizen Science in Archaeology.” American Antiquity 79 (4): 749–762. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.79.4.749749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. 2015. The Smell of Battle, the Taste of Siege: A Sensory History of the Civil War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, T. F. 2016. “In Praise of Vagueness: Uncertainty, Ambiguity and Archaeological Methodology.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23 (2): 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9257-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, M. D. 2001. “A Framework for Assessing Military Dress Authenticity in Civil War Reenacting.” Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 19 (4): 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0101900401.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlow, S. 2000. “Emotion in Archaeology.” Current Anthropology 41 (5): 713–746. https://doi.org/10.1086/317404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunem, H. 2020. “Viking Women: Aprondress.” Accessed June 2, 2024. https://urd.priv.no/viking/smokkr.html#int-larsson.
   Google Scholar
• Tringham, R., and A. Danis. 2019. “Doing sensory archaeology: The challenges.” In The Routledge Handbook of Sensory Archaeology, edited by R. Skeates and J. Day, 48–75. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Dries, M. H. 2021. “The Public Benefits of Archaeology According to the Public.” Internet Archaeology 57. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.57.16.
   Google Scholar
• Vartiainen, L. 2010. Yhteisöllinen käsityö: Verkostoja, taitoja ja yhteisiä elämyksiä. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Vedeler, M., and L. Hammarlund. 2017. “Reconstructing the Tunic from Lendbreen in Norway.” Archaeological Textiles Review 59:24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. 2020. “Dressing for Ragnarök? Commodifying, Appropriating and Fetishising the Vikings.” In Digging into the Dark Ages: Early Medieval Public Archaeologies, edited by H. Williams and P. Clarke, 65–75. Oxford: Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Wessman, A., S. Thomas, V. Rohiola, M. Koho, E. Ikkala, J. Tuominen, E. Hyvönen, J. Kuitunen, H. Parviainen, and M. Niukkanen. 2019. “Citizen Science in Archaeology: Developing a Collaborative Web Service for Archaeological Finds in Finland.” In Transforming Heritage Practice in the 21st Century, edited by J. H. Jameson and S. Musteaţă, 337–352. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar