Using enterprise architecture to analyse how organisational structure impact motivation and learning

References

• Appelbaum, S. H., N. St-Pierre, and W. Glavas. 1998. “Strategic Organizational Change: The Role of Leadership, Learning, Motivation and Productivity.” Management Decision 36 (5): 289–301. doi:10.1108/00251749810220496.
   Google Scholar
• Aussenac-Gilles, N., and S. Szulman. 2008. “The TERMINAE Method and Platform for Ontology Engineering from Texts.” In Ontology Learning and Population: Bridging the Gap between Text and Knowledge, edited by P. Buitelaar and P. Cimiano. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayman, R., M. M. Chemers, and F. Fiedler. 1995. “The Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: Its Levels of Analysis.” The Leadership Quarterly 6 (2): 147–167. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90032-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baligh, H. H., R. M. Burton, and B. Obel. 1996. “Organizational Consultant: Creating a Useable Theory for Organizational Design.” Management Science 42 (12): 1648–1662. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.12.1648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet, A., and D. Bennet. 2003. “Designing the Knowledge Organization of the Future: The Intelligent Complex Adaptive System.” In Handbook on Knowledge Management, edited by C. Holsapple, 623–638. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bleistein, S. J., K. Cox, J. Verner, and K. T. Phalp. 2006. “B-SCP: A Requirements Analysis Framework for Validating Strategic Alignment of Organizational IT Based on Strategy, Context, and Process.” Information and Software Technology 48 (9): 846–868. Special Issue Section: Distributed Software Development. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2005.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeker, W., and J. Goodstein. 1991. “Organizational Performance and Adaptation: Effects of Environment and Performance on Changes in Board Composition.” The Academy of Management Journal 34 (4): 805–826. doi:10.2307/256390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolman, L., and T. Deal. 2008. Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Boselie, P., G. Dietz, and C. Boon. 2005. “Commonalities and Contradictions in HRM and Performance Research.” Human Resource Management Journal 15 (3): 67–94. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, W. W., and G. H. Litwin. 1992. “A Causal Model of Organizational Performance and Change.” Journal of Management 18 (3): 523–545. doi:10.1177/014920639201800306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R. M., J. Lauridsen, and B. Obel. 2002. “Return on Assets Loss from Situational and Contingency Misfits.” Management Science 48 (11): 1461–1485. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.11.1461.262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R. M., and B. Obel. 1995. “The Validity of Computational Models in Organization Science: From Model Realism to Purpose of the Model.” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 1 (1): 57–71. doi:10.1007/BF01307828.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, R. M., and B. Obel. 2004. Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Buschle, M., J. Ullberg, U. Franke, R. Lagertsröm, and T. Sommestad. 2010. “A Tool for Enterprise Architecture Analysis using the PRM Formalism.” CAiSE 2010 Forum Post Proceedings, October.
   Google Scholar
• Carley, K. M. 2002. “Computational Organizational Science and Organizational Engineering.” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 10: 253–269. doi:10.1016/S1569-190X(02)00119-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, D.-S., and K.-S. Choi. 2006. “Incremental Cue Phrase Learning and Bootstrapping Method for Causality Extraction Using Cue Phrase and Word Pair Probabilities.” Information Processing and Management 42: 662–678. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2005.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., J. G. March, and J. P. Olsen. 1972. “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1): 1–25. doi:10.2307/2392088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., J. A. LePine, and R. A. Noe. 2000. “Toward an Integrative Theory of Training Motivation: A Meta-Analytic Path Analysis of 20 Years of Research.” Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (5): 678–707. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combs, J., Y. Liu, A. Hall, and D. Ketchen. 2006. “How Much Do High-Performance Work Practices Matter? A Meta-Analysis of Their Effects on Organizational Performance.” Personnel Psychology 59: 501–528. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., H. W. Lane, and R. E. White. 1999. “An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution.” Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 522–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., E. A. Feigenbaum, and J. G. March. 1959. “Models in a Behavioral Theory of the Firm.” Behavioral Science 4 (2): 81–95. doi:10.1002/bs.3830040202.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. 2007. DoD Architecture Framework, Version 1.5. Technical Report. United States Department of Defense. Accessed March 14, 2012. http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/dodaf20/products/DoDAF_2-0_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Engelsman, W., D. Quartel, H. Jonkers, and M. van Sinderen. 2011. “Extending Enterprise Architecture Modelling with Business Goals and Requirements.” Enterprise Information Systems 5 (1): 9–36. doi:10.1080/17517575.2010.491871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, R., and W. Davis. 2005. “High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Internal Social Structure.” Journal of Management 31 (5): 758–775. doi:10.1177/0149206305279370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. M., and M. A. Lyles. 1985. “Organizational Learning.” Academy of Management Review 10 (4): 803–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, S. W., and B. Wooldridge. 1997. “Middle Management’s Strategic Influence and Organizational Performance.” Journal of Management Studies 34 (3): 465–485. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, U., P. Johnson, J. König, and L. Marcks von Würtemberg. 2012. “Availability of Enterprise IT Systems: An Expert-Based Bayesian Framework.” Software Quality Journal 20 (2): 369–394. doi:10.1007/s11219-011-9141-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., and D. Jones. 2007. “The Anatomy of a Design Theory.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (5): 312–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group, T. O. 2008. TOGAF 2007 Edition. Zaltbommel: Van Haren.
   Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran, A., C. Patel, and R. E. McGaughey 2004. “A Framework for Supply Chain Performance Measurement.” International Journal of Production Economics 87 (3): 333–347. Supply Chain Management for the 21st Century Organizational Competitiveness. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M., and A. Raviv. 2002. “Organization Design.” Management Science 48 (7): 852–865. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.7.852.2821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram. 2004. Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28 (1): 75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., and G. Jones. 2007. Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., and G. Hofstede. 2005. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P. 1991. “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures.” Organization Science 2 (1): 88–115. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huselid, M. A., and B. Becker. 2011. “Bridging Micro and Macro Domains: Workforce Differentiation and Strategic Human Resource Management.” Journal of Management 37 (2): 421–428. doi:10.1177/0149206310373400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO/IEC 42010: 2007. Systems and Software Engineering - Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems. Technical Report. International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaram, J., C. Droge, and S. K. Vickery. 1999. “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Manufacturing Performance.” Journal of Operations Management 18 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00013-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., and M. Ekstedt. 2007. Enterprise Architecture: Models and Analyses for Information Systems Decision Making. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., R. Lagerström, P. Närman, and M. Simonsson. 2007. “Enterprise Architecture Analysis with Extended Influence Diagrams.” Information Systems Frontiers 9 (2–3): 163–180. doi:10.1007/s10796-007-9030-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, J., P. Närman, U. Franke, and U. Nordström. 2011. “An Extended Framework for Reliability Analysis of ICT for PowerSystems.” Proceedings of IEEE Power Tech 2011, June.
   Google Scholar
• Lagerström, R., P. Johnson, and M. Ekstedt. 2010. “Architecture Analysis of Enterprise Systems Modifiability: A Metamodel for Software Change Cost Estimation.” Software Quality Journal 18: 437–468. Online First. 10.1007/s11219-010-9100-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankhorst, M. 2005. Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication, and Analysis. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, B., and J. G. March. 1988. “Organizational Learning.” Annual Review of Sociology 319–338. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, R. E. 2004. “Computational Modeling of Organizations Comes of Age.” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 10 (2): 127–145. doi:10.1023/B:CMOT.0000039166.53683.d0.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, W. F. 1990. “A Framework for Analysis of Performance.” Journal of Construction Engineering Management 116 (3): 399–415. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:3(399).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, W. C., and S. A. Thompson. 1988. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text 8 (3): 243–281.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2 (1): 71–87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1994. A Primer on Decision Making – How Decisions Happen. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, G., and R. H. Heck. 1993. “Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and testing a Model.” Organization Science 4 (2): 209–225. doi:10.1287/orsc.4.2.209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsick, V. J., and K. E. Watkins. 2003. “Demonstrating the Value of an Organization’s Learning Culture: The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 5 (2): 132–151. doi:10.1177/1523422303005002002.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, F., S. Buckl, J. Leitel, and C. M. Schweda. 2008. Enterprise Architecture Management Tool Survey. Technical Report. Munich: Technische Universität München.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., and C. A. Smith. 2000. “HRM Practices and Organizational Commitment: Test of a Mediation Model.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration 17 (4): 319–331. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.2000.tb00231.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E., C. C. Snow, A. D. Meyer, and H. J. Coleman. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. The Academy of Management Review 3 (3): 546–562.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. 2008. MOD Architecture Framework Version 1.2.003. Technical Report. Ministry of Defence, UK. Accessed November 17, 2009. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/36757/20100602MODAFDownload12004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, C. A., and M. E. Porter. 1991. Strategy: Seeking and Securing Competitive Advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. 1980. “Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory.” Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (4): 605–622. doi:10.2307/2392283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A. I. 1988. “A Contingency View of Porter’s ʻGeneric Strategies’.” The Academy of Management Review 13 (3): 390–400. doi:10.5465/AMR.1988.4306951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Närman, P., U. Franke, J. König, M. Buschle, and M. Ekstedt. 2011. Enterprise Architecture Availability Analysis Using Fault Trees and Stakeholder Interviews. Enterprise Information Systems. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Närman, P. 2013. A Literature Review of Organization Theory. Technical Report. Stockholm: Industrial Information and Control Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, G. R., and J. R. Hackman. 1981. “Relationships between Organizational Structure and Employee Reactions: Comparing Alternative Frameworks.” Administrative Science Quarterly 66–83. doi:10.2307/2392600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OMG (Object Management Group, Inc.). 2008. Business Motivational Model. Technical Report. Object Management Group. http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/1.1/
   Google Scholar
• OMG. 2009. OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Superstructure Version 2.2. Technical Report. Object Management Group, OMG. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.2/Superstructure/PDF/
   Google Scholar
• OMG. 2010. Object Constraint Language, Version 2.2. Technical Report. Object Management Group, OMG. OMG Document Number: formal/2010-02-01. http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.2/PDF
   Google Scholar
• OMG. 2011. Value Delivery Modeling Language Version 1.2.003. Technical Report. Object Management Group. http://www.omg.org/spec/VDML/1.0/Beta1
   Google Scholar
• Paul, A., and R. Anantharaman. 2003. “Impact of People Management Practices on Organizational Performance: Analysis of a Causal Model.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 14 (7): 1246–1266. doi:10.1080/0958519032000145648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research.” Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (3): 45–77. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., and H. G. Rainey. 1988. “The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy.” The Academy of Management Review 13 (2): 182–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., and A. L. Delbecq. 1977. “Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation.” The Academy of Management Review 2 (1): 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P. 1990. Organization Theory: Structure, Design, and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Romme, A. G. L., and G. Endenburg. 2006. “Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design.” Organization Science 17 (2): 287–297. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. W., P. Weill, and D. Robertson. 2006. Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. 1990. “Organizational Culture.” American Psychologist 45 (2): 109–119. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman, P. 2011. “Problems in the Organization of Organization Theory: An Essay in Honour of Todd LaPorte.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 19 (1): 43–50. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00630.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P. 1994. The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization. New York: Random House LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, K. K., and A. H. Van de Ven. 2005. “Designing Work within and between Organizations.” Organization Science 16 (4): 389–408. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinkula, J. M., W. E. Baker, and T. Noordewier. 1997. “A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge, and Behavior.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (4): 305–318. doi:10.1177/0092070397254003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. C., and L. G. Hrebiniak. 1980. “Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance.” Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (2): 317–336. doi:10.2307/2392457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenberg, C., and J. vom Brocke. 2012. “Evaluation Patterns for Design Science Research Artefacts.” In Practical Aspects of Design Science, 71–83. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, N. 2007. Guide to Organisation Design: Creating High-Performing and Adaptable Enterprises (Vol. 10). London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Udy, Jr., S. H. 1959. “ʻBureaucracy’ and ʻRationality’ in Weber’s Organization Theory: An Empirical Study.” American Sociological Review 24 (6): 791–795. doi:10.2307/2088566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, D., and M. Crossan. 2004. “Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning.” Academy of Management Review 29 (2): 222–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versteeg, G., and H. Bouwman. 2006. “Business Architecture: A New Paradigm to Relate Business Strategy to ICT.” Information Systems Frontiers 8 (2): 91–102. doi:10.1007/s10796-006-7973-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, R., and R. Fischer. 2007. “Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture.” Journal of Enterprise Architecture 3 (2): 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, B., K. E. Watkins, and V. J. Marsick. 2004. “The Construct of the Learning Organization: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 15 (1): 31–55. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1086.
   Google Scholar
• Youndt, M., S. A. Snell, J. W. Dean Jr., and D. P. Lepak. 1996. “Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance.” The Academy of Management Journal 39 (4): 836–866. doi:10.2307/256714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachman, J. 1987. A Framework for Information System Architecture. Technical Report. Los Angeles, CA: IBM Systems.
   Google Scholar