Supply chain decisions under asymmetric information with cost and fairness concern

References

• Bi, G. B., S. H. He, Y. Luo, and L. Liang. 2013. “Supply Chain Coordination with Sales-rebate Contract under Fairness Preferences.” Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice 33 (10): 2505–2512.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. E., and A. Ockenfels. 2000. “ECR: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition.” American Economic Review 90 (1): 166–193. doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caginalp, G., and S. J. Ho. 2018. “Does Competition Inhibit Fairness and Altruism? [J].” Economic Modelling 72 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2018.01.005.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, E. B., and L. M. Hou. 2016. “Research on the Optimal Decision of Supply Chain in Asymmetry of Fairness Concern.” Chinese Journal of Management 13 (7): 1070–1074.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., and R. Paul. 2016. “The Role of Fairness in Competitive Supply Chain Relationships: An Experimental Study.” European Journal of Operational Research 251 (3): 798–813. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englmaier, F., and S. G. Leider. 2012. “Contractual and Organizational Structure with Reciprocal Agents.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 12 (6): 146–183.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., and K. M. Schmidt. 1999. “A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3): 817–868. doi:10.1162/003355399556151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, C., B. Yu, Y. T. Wang, and Y. Zhang. 2018. “Fair Distribution Mechanism of Channel Profit under Exponential Demand in Agri-food Supply Chain.” Journal of Systems & Management 27 (3): 470–477.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, A. Y. 2001. “Supplier-Buyer Contracting: Asymmetric Cost Information and Cutoff Level Policy for Buyer Participation.” Naval Research Logistics 48 (1): 41–64. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, T. K., X. M. Su, and Y. Z. Wu. 2014. “Distributional and Peer Induced Fairness in Supply Chain Contract Design.” Production and Operations Management 23 (2): 161–175. doi:10.1111/poms.12064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, G. J., and D. Wang. 2016. “Supply Chain Decision Making of Competitive Manufacturers under Multilateral Information Asymmetry.” Statistics and Decision 15 (20): 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, X. L. 2006. “Supply Chain Contract Designing under Asymmetric Producing Cost Information.” Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology (natural Science Edition) 21 (1): 64–67.
   Google Scholar
• João, B. S., N. Santos, and C. S. Paula (2019). “Enterprise Maturity Models: A Systematic Literature Review.” Enterprise Information Systems, In press, 719–769.
   Google Scholar
• Katok, E. T., V. Olsen, and J. Pavlov. 2014. “Wholesale Pricing under Mild and Privately Known Concerns for Fairness.” Production and Operations Management 23 (2): 285–302. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01388.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, A. H. L., H. S. Lau, and J. C. Wang. 2007. “Pricing and Volume Discounting for a Dominant Retailer with Uncertain Manufacturing Cost Information.” European Journal of Operaional Research 183 (2): 848–870. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T., and M. Yu. 2017. “Coordinating a Supply Chain When Facing Strategic Consumers.” Decision Sciences 48 (2): 336–355. doi:10.1111/deci.12224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W. H., D. Wang, X. R. Shen, X. Y. Yan, and W. Y. Wei (2018). “The Impacts of Distributional and Peer-induced Fairness Concers on the Decision-making of Order Allocation in Logistics Service Supply Chain.” Transportation Research Part E, In press, 102–122. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2018.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Loch, C. H., and Y. Z. Wu. 2008. “Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance: An Experimental Study.” Management Science 54 (11): 1835–1849. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, P., and H. Y. Wang. 2017. “Pricing Strategies with Fairness Preference by considering Quality and Marketing Efforts.” Control and Decision 32 (8): 1449–1456.
   Google Scholar
• Netzer, N., and A. Schmutzler. 2014. “Explaining Gift-exchange – The Limits of Good Intentions.” Journal of the European Economic Association 12 (6): 1586–1616. doi:10.1111/jeea.12086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlov, V., and E. Katok (2009). “Fairness and Coordination Failures in Supply Chain Contracts.” Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, F., F. Mai, J. Fry Michael, and A. S. Raturi. 2016. “Supply-chain Performance Anomalies: Fairness Concerns under Private Cost Information.” European Journal of Operational Research 252 (1): 170–182. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, Y. H., and D. D. Xu. 2017. “The Wholesale Price Contract Coordination of Demand Dependent on Effort: An Analysis based on Asymmetric Information of fairness concern.” Commercial Research 8: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Y. H., and G. X. Wei. 2015. “The Dynamic Evolution Analysis on Fairness Concern of Supply Chain under Wholesale Price Contract.” Forecasting 34 (5): 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Y. H., G. X. Wei, and J. X. Dong (2017). “Signaling Game Model under Asymmetric Fairness-concern Information.” Cluster Computing, In press, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, W. N., Y. Zhao, X. M. Hu, L. D. Xu, and A. Q. Tang (2019). “A Method Towards Web Service Combination for Cross-organisational Business Process Using QoS and Cluster,” Enterprise Information Systems, In press, 631–649. doi:10.1080/17517575.2019.1576227
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. S., Y. Zhou, J. Liu, and Y. J. Zheng. 2018. “Research on the Equilibrium Model of Service Supply Chain Network Based on Fairness Concern and Quality.” Ruan Ke Xue 32 (5): 132–138.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. P., and X. Y. Xu. 2008. “Incentive Mechanism for Two-echelon Supply Chain under Asymmetric Information.” Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 14 (3): 519–524.
   Google Scholar
• X J, P., and D. L. Jin. 2014. “Fairness Preference, Reference Point Effect and Operation Research in Three Layer Supply chains[J].” Control and Decision 1 (21): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, M. L., and J. J. Shen. 2014. “A Study on Relationship of Manufacturers’ Benefit Sharing and Supplier’s Quality Investment under Fairness Preference.” Journal of Systems & Management 23 (1): 52–61.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, X. Y., and S. P. Wu. 2009. “Coordinating Two-echelon Supply Chain with Asymmetric Information of Manufacturing Cost.” Journal of Systems Engineering 24 (1): 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, B., and Y. P. Liu. 2015. “Decision Analysis of Retailer-dominated Hybrid Channel Supply Chain under the Asymmetric Cost Information.” Chinese Journal of Management Science 23 (12): 124–134.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, D. Q., X. H. Yue, and J. Liu. 2008. “Vertical Cost Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Value-adding Retailers.” The International Journal of Management Science 36 (5): 838–851.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., and Y. Ma. 2018. “Multi-product Expedited Ordering with Demand Forecast Updates.” International Journal of Production Economics 206: 196–208. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., and J. H. Ma. 2016. “Research on the Complex Features about a Dual-channel Supply Chain with a Fair Caring Retailer.” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 30 (1): 151–167. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., and X. C. Wang (2018). “The Impact of Fairness Concern on the Three-party Supply Chain Coordination.” Industrial Marketing Management, In press. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, D. Z., and X. Lv. 2011. “Vender Managed Inventory Model Based on Overconfident Suppliers under Stochastic Demand.” Systems Engineering 29 (8): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, X. X., Z. Liu, and W. Kevin. 2019. “Cooperative Game Approaches to Coordinating a Three-echelon Closed-loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns.” International Journal of Production Economics 212: 92–110. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar