References
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS. Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read (00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2000.
- Barbetta PM, Heward WL, Bradley DM. Effects of immediate and delayed error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of sight words by students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1994; 27:177–178.
- Browder DM, Lalli JS. Review of research on sight word instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1991;12:203–228.
- Browder DM, Wakeman SY, Spooner F, Ahlgrim-Delzell L, Algozzine B. Research of reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children 2006;72:392–408.
- Ferkis MA, Belfiore PJ, Skinner CH. The effects of response repetitions on sight word acquisition for students with mild disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education 1997;7:307–324.
- Kupzyk S, Daly-III EJ, Andersen MN. A comparison of two flash-card methods for improving sight word reading. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2011;44:781–792.
- Browder DM, Xin YP. A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education 1998;32:130–153.
- Lerman, DC, Iwata, BA, Hanley, GP. Applied behavior analysis. In Madden GJ, Dube WV, Hackenberg TD, Hanley GP, Lattal KA (Ed). APA handbook of behavior analysis, Vol. 1: Methods and principles (pp. 81–104). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. 2013.
- Baumgart D, VanWalleghem J. Teaching sight words: A comparison between computer-assisted and teacher-taught methods. Education and Training in Mental Retardation 1987;22:56–65.
- Gast DL, Doyle PM, Wolery M, Ault MJ, Farmer J. Assessing the acquisition of incidental information by secondary-age students with mental retardation: Comparison of response prompting strategies. American Journal on Mental Retardation 1991;96:63–80.
- Lalli JS, Browder DM. Comparison of sight word training procedures with validation of the most practical procedure in teaching reading for daily living. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1993;14:107–127.
- Glat R, Gould K, Stoddard LT, Sidman M. A note on transfer of stimulus control in the delayed cue procedure: Facilitation by an overt response. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1994;27:699–704.
- Fabry BD, Matthew GI, Hanson A. Incidental teaching of mentally retarded students with a token system. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 1984;89:29–36.
- Bruininks RH, Woodcock RW, Weatherman RF, Hill BK. 1996. Scales of independent behavior – revised: Manual. Boston, MA: Riverside Publishing Company.
- Lockavitch J. 1996. Failure free reading. Concord, NC: Failure Free Reading.
- Iwata BA, Pace GM, Cowdery GE, Miltenberger RG. What makes extinction work: An analysis of procedural form and function. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1994;27:131–144.
- Borrero JC, Volmer TR, Wright CS. An evaluation of contingency strength and response suppression. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2002;35:337–347.
- Martens BM, DiGennaro FD, Reed DD, Szczech FM, Rosenthal BD. Contingency space analysis: An alternative method for identifying contingent relations from observational data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2008;41:68–81.
- Nist L, Joseph L. Effectiveness and efficiency of flashcard drill instructional methods on urban first graders’ word recognition, maintenance, and generalization. School Psychology Review 2008;37:264–308.