Effect of feedback from a socially interactive humanoid robot on reaching kinematics in children with and without cerebral palsy: A pilot study

References

• Jones MW, Morgan E, Shelton JE, Thorogood C. Cerebral Palsy: introduction and Diagnosis (Part I). Journal of Pediatric Health Care. 2007;21(3):146–152. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2006.06.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krigger KW. Cerebral Palsy: an Overview. American Family Physician. 2006;73(1):91–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cerebral Palsy, 2016. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/cp/data.html.
   Google Scholar
• Visicato LP, Da Costa CS, Damasceno VA, De Campos AC, Rocha NA. Evaluation and characterization of manual reaching in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2014;36C:162–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyd RN, Morris ME, Graham HK. Management of upper limb dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy: a systemic review. European Journal of Neurology. 2001;8(Suppl. 5):150–166. doi:10.1046/j.1468-1331.2001.00048.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Boyd R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic management of upper-limb dysfunction in children with congenital hemiplegia. Pediatrics. 2009;123(6):e1111–1122. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak I, McIntyre S, Morgan C, Campbell L, Dark L, Morton N, Stumbles E, Wilson SA, Goldsmith S. A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: state of the evidence. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2013;55(10):885–910. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau C, Barbeau H, Rossignol S. Early locomotor training with clonidine in spinal cats. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1998;79(1):392–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272(5269):1971–1994. doi:10.1126/science.272.5269.1791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor NF, Dodd K, McBurney H, Graham HK. Factors influencing adherence to a home-based strength-training programme for young people with cerebral palsy. Physiotherapy. 2004;90:57–63. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2003.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• James S, Ziviani J, King G, Boyd RN. Understanding engagement in home-based interactive computer play: perspectives of children with unilateral cerebral palsy and their caregivers. Phy Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015;25:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Howard A. Effects of robotic therapy on upper-extremity function in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. 2016;19(1):64–71. doi:10.3109/17518423.2014.899648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik NA, Hanapiah FA, Rahman RAA, Yussof H. Emergence of socially assistive robotics in rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy: A review. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. 2016;13:135. doi:10.5772/64163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard A, Chen Y, Park CH. From autism spectrum disorder to cerebral palsy: state-of-the-art in pediatric therapy robots. In: Desai JP ed. Encyclopedia of medical robotics. World Scientific Publishing Company; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ge B, Park HW, Howard A Identifying engagement from joint kinematics data for robot therapy prompt interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. 8th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR); 2016 Nov; Kansas City, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman RAA, Hanapiah FA, Basri HH, Malik NA, Yussof H. Use of humanoid robot in children with cerebral palsy: the ups and downs in clinical experience. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;76:394–399. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.316.
   Google Scholar
• Kozyavkin KV, Kachmar O, Ablikova I Humanoid social robots in the rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare; 2014; Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Fridin M, Bar-Haim S, Belokopytov M Robotics Agent Coacher for CP Motor Function (RACP Fun). Workshop Robotic Neurol Rahabil; 2011; San Francisco, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mejias SC, Echevarria C, Nunez P, Manso L, Bustos P, Leal S, Parra C. Ursus: A robotic assistant for training of children with motor impairments. Res Neurorehabil. 2013;1:249–253.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman Wood K, Lathan CE, Kaufman KR. Feasibility of gestural feedback treatment for upper extremity movement in children with cerebral palsy. IEEE Trans Neural Sys Rehabil Engineer. 2013;21(2):300–305. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2227804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Vergara S, Chen Y, Howard A Super Pop VRTM: an adaptable virtual reality game for upper-body rehabilitation, HCI International Conference; 2013 July; Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Vergara S, Serrano M, Chen Y, Howard AM Developing a baseline for upper-body motor skill assessment using a robotic kinematic model. IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2014; Edinburgh, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Vergara S, Brown L, Chen Y, Howard AM (2016). Increasing the efficacy of rehabilitation protocols for children via a robotic playmate providing real-time corrective feedback. IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Columbia University; 2016 August 26–31; New York City, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Tatla SK, Sauve K, Virji-Babul N, et al. Evidence for outcomes of motivational rehabilitation interventions for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: An American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2013;55(7):593–601. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett DJ, Palisano RJ. Physical therapists’ perceptions of factors influencing the acquisition of motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy: implications for clinical reasoning. Physical Therapy. 2002;82:237–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH, et al. Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain. 2011;134:1591–1609. doi:10.1093/brain/awr039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danzi MA, Etter NM, Andreatta RD, Kitzman PH. Facilitating neurorehabilitation through principles of engagement. Journal of Allied Health. 2012;41:35–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magill R, Anderson D. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications. 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Newell KM. Changes in movement and skill: learning, retention, and transfer. In: Latash MT, Turvey MT editors. Dexterity and its development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996. p. 393–430.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerbeck U, Yousif N, Greenwood R, et al. Movement speed is biased by prior experience. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2014;111(1):128–134. doi:10.1152/jn.00522.2013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar