Eye-gaze control technology for children, adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy with significant physical disability: Findings from a systematic review

References

• Novak I, Hines M, Goldsmith S, Barclay R. Clinical prognostic messages from a systematic review on cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e1285–e312. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-0924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creer S, Enderby P, Judge S, John A. Prevalence of people who could benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in the UK: determining the need. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorder. 2016;51(6):639–653. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen A. Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development. 2005;6(2):151–166. doi:10.1080/14649880500120491.
   Google Scholar
• Østvik J, Ytterhus B, Balandin S. Friendship between children using augmentative and alternative communication and peers: A systematic literature review. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability. 2016;1–13. doi:10.3109/13668250.2016.1247949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman D, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. 4th Edition. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co, Maryland; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Newman L, Grace E, Wood D. Enhancing social participation in young people with communication disabilities living in rural Australia: outcomes of a home-based intervention for using social media. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2015;37(17):1576–1590. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1052578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donegan M, Morris JD, Corno F, Signorile I, Chio A, Pasian V, Vignola, A, Buchholz, M, Holmqvist, E Understanding users and their needs. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2009;8(4):259–275. doi:10.1007/s10209-009-0148-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Parsons R, Falkmer T, Hemmingsson H. Eye gaze performance for children with severe physical impairments using gaze-based assistive technology: a longitudinal study. Assistive Technology. 2016;28(2):93–102. doi:10.1080/10400435.2015.1092182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Heneghan C, Liberati A, Moschetti I, Phillips B, Thornton H. Explanation of the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence (background document). Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine; 2011. Available at http://www cebm net/index aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Higgins JPT, Elbers RG, Reeves BC on behalf of the development group for ROBINS-I. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I): Detailed guidance. Available at http://www.riskofbias.info.
   Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Ahlsten G, Falkmer T, Hemmingsson H. Gaze-based assistive technology in daily activities in children with severe physical impairments: an intervention study. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. 2017;20(3):129–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang C-S, Weng -H-H, Wang L-F, Tsai C-H, Chang H-T. An eye-tracking assistive device improves the quality of life for ALS patients and reduces the caregivers’ burden. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2014;46(4):233–238. doi:10.1080/00222895.2014.891970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallen M, Stewart K. The GAS approach: Scaling tailored goals. In: Poulsen A, Ziviani J, Cuskelly M, editors. Motivation and goal setting: Engaging children and parents. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Monette M, Lapierre Y, Arnold DL, Wolfson C. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2002;24(1–3):21–30. doi:10.1080/09638280110066352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh J, Murza KA, Malani MD, Binger C. Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative Altern Commun. 2015;31(4):271–284. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1052153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Use of a team-based approach to assistive technology assessment and planning for children with multiple disabilities: A pilot study. Assistive Technology. 2007;19(3):109–127. doi:10.1080/10400435.2007.10131869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk K, Tönsing K. Eye gaze technology: A South African perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2015;10(4):340–346. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.974222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrden A, Schudlo L, Weyand S, Zeyl T, Chau T. Trends in communicative access solutions for children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Child Neurology. 2014;29(8):1108–1118. doi:10.1177/0883073814534320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter M, Maxwell K. Promoting interaction with children using augmentative communication through a peer‐directed intervention. International Journal of Disability, development and Education. 1998;45(1):75–96. doi:10.1080/1034912980450106.
   Google Scholar
• Binger C, Kent-Walsh J, Ewing C, Taylor S. Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2010;19(2):108–120. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas SN, Light JC, McNaughton DB. Teaching paraeducators to support the communication of young children with complex communication needs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 2013;33(2):91–101. doi:10.1177/0271121412467074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels R, De Witte L, Andrich R, Ferrario M, Persson J, Oberg B, Oortwijm, W, VanBeekum, T, Lorensten, ØIPPA, a user-centred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology provision. Technology and Disability. 2000;13(2):105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy J, Boa S, Ltd. TM. A critical appraisal of existing methods of measuring outcomes in relation to Augmentative and Alternative Communication Scotland: NHS Education for Scotland; 2013. Available at http://www.talkingmats.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/AAC-Outcome-Measures-Final-Report-2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Enderby P, John A, Petheram B. Therapy outcome measures for rehabilitation professionals: speech and language therapy, physiotherapy, occupational therapy. Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Chicester: 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Keycomm Resource Centre. C.O.D.E.S Framework; Available at https://codesframework.wordpress.com/downloads/.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: children & Youth Version: ICF-CY; 2017. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43737/1/9789241547321_eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy BR, Boa S, Enderby P Testing the reliability and validity of the Therapy Outcome Measure for AAC; 2017. Available at http://www.talkingmats.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/TOM-AAC-Final-report-Oct-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mandak K, O’Neill T, Light J, Fosco GM. Bridging the gap from values to actions: A family systems framework for family-centered AAC services. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 2017;33(1):32-41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan SE, Renzoni AM. Family Impact Scale of Assistive Technology Scale for AAC (FIATS-AAC); 2017. Available athttps://flintbox.com/public/project/27105/. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Delarosa E, Horner S, Eisenberg C, Ball L, Renzoni AM, Ryan SE. Family Impact of Assistive Technology Scale: development of a measurement scale for parents of children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 2012;28(3):171–180. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.704525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerebral Palsy Alliance. Eye-gaze control technology; 2017. Available at https://www.cerebralpalsy.org.au/about-cerebral-palsy/interventions-and-therapies/eye-gaze-technology-for-children-and-adults-with-cerebral-palsy/.
   Google Scholar