An Evaluation of Operant Behavioural Economics in Functional Communication Training for Severe Problem Behaviour

References

• Cannella HI, O’Reilly MF, Lancioni GE. Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature. Res Dev Disabil. 2005;26(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon IG, Iwata BA. Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996;29(4):519–32. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher WW, Piazza CC, Bowman LG, Amari A. Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. Am J Ment Retard. 1996;101:15–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher WW, Piazza CC, Bowman LG, Hagopian LP, Owens JC, Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992;25(2):491–98. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannerman DJ, Sheldon JB, Sherman JA, Harchik AE. Balancing the right to habilitation with the right to personal liberties: the rights of people with developmental disabilities to eat too many doughnuts and take a nap. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990;23(1):79–89. doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon IG, Iwata BA, Goh HL, Worsdell AS. Emergence of reinforcer preference as a function of schedule requirements and stimulus similarity. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997;30(3):439–49. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tustin RD. Preference for reinforcers under varying schedule arrangements: A behavioral economic analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994;27(4):597–606. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon IG, Frank MA, Gregory MK, Allman MJ. On the correspondence between preference assessment outcomes and progressive-ratio schedule assessments of stimulus value. J Appl Behav Anal. 2009;42(3):729–33. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon IG, Gregory MK, Frank-Crawford MA, Allman MJ, Wilke AE, Carreau-Webster AB, Triggs MM. Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011;44(3):543–58. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roane HS, Lerman DC, Vorndran CM. Assessing reinforcers under progressive schedule requirements. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001;34(2):145–66. doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank-Crawford MA, Castillo MI, DeLeon IG. Does preference rank predict substitution for the reinforcer for problem behavior? a behavioral economic analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018;51(2):276–82. doi:10.1002/jaba.452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hursh SR, Bauman RA. The behavioral analysis of demand. In: Green L, Kagel JH, editors. Advances in behavioral economics. Norwood (New Jersey): Ablex Publishing Corporation; 1987. p. 117–65.
   Google Scholar
• Jarmolowicz DP, Lattal KA. On distinguishing progressively increasing response requirements for reinforcement. Behav Anal. 2017;33(1):119–25. doi:10.1007/BF03392207.
   Google Scholar
• Trosclair-Lasserre NM, Lerman DC, Call NA, Addison LR, Kodak T. Reinforcement magnitude: an evaluation of preference and reinforcer efficacy. J Appl Behav Anal. 2008;41(2):203–20. doi:10.1901/jaba.2008.41-203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerwin ME, Ahearn WH, Eicher PS, Burd DM. The costs of eating: a behavioral economic analysis of food refusal. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995;28(3):245–60. doi:10.1901/jaba.1995.28-245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roane HS, Falcomata TS, Fisher WW. Applying the behavioral economics principle of unit price to DRO schedule thinning. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007;40(3):529–34. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.40-529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed DD, Luiselli JK, Magnuson JD, Fillers S, Vieira S, Rue HC. A comparison between traditional economical and demand curve analyses of relative reinforcer efficacy in the validation of preference assessment predictions. Dev Neurorehabil. 2009;12(3):164–69. doi:10.1080/17518420902858983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrero JC, Francisco MT, Haberlin AT, Ross NA, Sran SK. A unit price evaluation of severe problem behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007;40(3):463–74. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.40-463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilroy SP, Kaplan BA, Leader G. A systematic review of applied behavioral economics in assessments and treatments for individuals with developmental disabilities. Rev J Autism Dev Disord. 2018;5(3):247–59. doi:10.1007/s40489-018-0136-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francisco MT, Borrero JC, Sy JR, Roane H. Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules. J Appl Behav Anal. 2008;41(2):189–202. doi:10.1901/jaba.2008.41-189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg MC, Allman MJ, Hagopian LP, Triggs MM, Frank-Crawford MA, Mostofsky SH, Denckla MB, DeLeon IG. Examining the reinforcing value of stimuli within social and non-social contexts in children with and without high-functioning autism. Autism. 2017;21(7):881–95. doi:10.1177/1362361316655035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodak T, Lerman DC, Call N. Evaluating the influence of postsession reinforcement on choice of reinforcers. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007;40(3):515–27. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.40-515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed DD, Niileksela CR, Kaplan BA. Behavioral economics: a tutorial for behavior analysts in practice. Behav Anal Pract. 2013;6(1):34–54. doi:10.1007/BF03391790.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Carroll ME. Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000;153:44–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MW, Bickel WK. Replacing relative reinforcing efficacy with behavioral economic demand curves. J Exp Anal Behav. 2006;85(1):73–93. doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.102-04.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz JL. Models of relative reinforcing efficacy of drugs and their predictive utility. Behav Pharmacol. 1990;1:283–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hursh SR, Silberberg A. Economic demand and essential value. Psychol Rev. 2008;115(1):186–98. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed DD, Kaplan BA, Becirevic A. Basic research on the behavioral economics of reinforcer value. In: DiGennaro-Reed FD, Reed DD, editors. Autism service delivery. New York, NY: Springer; 2015. p. 279–306.
   Google Scholar
• Delmendo X, Borrero JC, Beauchamp KL, Francisco MT. Consumption and response output as a function of unit price: manipulation of cost and benefit components. J Appl Behav Anal. 2009;42(3):609–25. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiger JH, Hanley GP, Bruzek J. Functional communication training: a review and practical guide. Behav Anal Pract. 2008;1(1):16–23. doi:10.1007/BF03391716.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodos W. Progressive Ratio as a Measure of Reward Strength. Science. 1961;134(3483):943–44. doi:10.1126/science.134.3483.943.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bullock CE, Fisher WW, Hagopian LP. Description and validation of a computerized behavioral data program: “BDataPro”. Behav Anal. 2017;40(1):275–85. doi:10.1007/s40614-016-0079-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwata BA, Dorsey MF, Slifer KJ, Bauman KE, Richman GS. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994;27(2):197–209. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza CC, Bowman LG, Contrucci SA, Delia MD, Adelinis JD, Goh HL. An evaluation of the properties of attention as reinforcement for destructive and appropriate behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999;32(4):437–49. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr EG, Durand VM. Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985;18(2):111–26. doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagopian LP, Fisher WW, Sullivan MT, Acquisto J, LeBlanc LA. Effectiveness of functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment: a summary of 21 inpatient cases. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998;31(2):211–35. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findley JD. Preference and switching under concurrent scheduling. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958;1(2):123–44. doi:10.1901/jeab.1958.1-123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilroy SP, Kaplan BA, Reed DD, Koffarnus MN, Hantula D. The Demand Curve Analyzer: behavioral economic software for applied researchers. J Exp Anal Behav. 2018. doi:10.1002/jeab.479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hursh SR, Roma PG. Behavioral economics and empirical public policy. J Exp Anal Behav. 2013;99(1):98–124. doi:10.1002/jeab.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarokoff RA, Sturmey P. The effects of behavioral skills training on staff implementation of discrete‐trial teaching. J Appl Behav Anal. 2004;37(4):535–38. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST. Behavioral economics: a novel experimental approach to the study of drug dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993;33(2):173–92. doi:10.1016/0376-8716(93)90059-Y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poling A. Progressive-ratio schedules and applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010;43(2):347–49. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar