The coaching model derivation process: combining grounded theory and canonical action research for developing coaching models

References

• Bachkirova, T., & Borrington, S. (2018). Old wine in new bottles: Exploring pragmatism as a philosophical framework for the discipline of coaching. Academy of Management Learning and Education, online, doi: 10.5465/amle.2017.0268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachkirova, T., Spence, G., & Drake, D. (2016). Introduction. In T. Bachkirova, G. Spence, & D. Drake (Eds.), The Sage handbook of coaching (pp. 41–71). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). What can grounded theorists and action researchers learn from each other? In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 398–417). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charan, R., Drotter, S., & Noel, J. (2011). The leadership pipeline. San Fransisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2002). Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 220–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, E., Bachkirova, T., & Clutterbuck, D. (2014). Theoretical traditions and coaching genres: Mapping the territory. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(2), 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, L. (2010). Coaching abrasive leaders: Using action research to reduce suffering and increase productivity in organizations. International Journal of Coaching in Organizations, 29(8), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, R., Martinsons, M., & Kock, N. (2004). Principles of canonical action research. Information Systems Journal, 14, 65–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, R., Martinsons, M., & Ou, C. (2012). The role of theory in canonical action research. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 763–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan, E., & Duckworth, A. (2012). Signalling a new trend in executive coaching outcome research. International Coaching Psychology Review, 8(1), 6–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, B. (2000). Cycles within cycles. [Online]. http://www.uq.net.au/action_research/arp/cycles.html
   Google Scholar
• Dick, B., Stringer, E., & Huxham, C. (2009). Theory in action research. Action Research, 7(1), 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes.com. (2017). The success and failure of the coaching industry. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2017/10/05/the-success-and-failure-of-the-coaching-industry/#3239dbdb6765
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology The Journal of the British Sociology Association, 12, 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2014). Past, present and future: The evolution of professional coaching and coaching psychology. In Handbook of coaching psychology (pp. 43–59). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2016). What constitutes evidence-based coaching?: A two-by-two framework for distinguishing strong from weak evidence for coaching. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 14(1), 74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Cavanagh, M. J. (2007). Evidence-based coaching: Flourishing or languishing? Australian Psychologist, 42(4), 239–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Stober, D. R. (2006). Evidence based coaching handbook: Putting best practices to work for your clients. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. E. (2011). Journeys towards the professionalisation of coaching: Dilemmas, dialogues and decisions along the global pathway. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 4(1), 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Greenall, P. (2006). The barriers to patient-driven treatment in mental health: Why patients may choose to follow their own path. Leadership in Health Services, 19(1), 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research (Second edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research (Second edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Henfridsson, O., & Lindgren, R. (2005). Multi-contextuality in ubiquitous computing: Investigating the car case through action research. Information and Organization, 15(2), 95–124.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggan, C. (2016). Transformative learning as a metatheory: Definition, criteria, and typology. Adult Education Quarterly, 66(1), 57–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, T., & Albertyn, R. M. (2017). Coaching for change in organisational teams: Reciprocal research and practice benefits. Journal for New Generation Sciences, 15(1), 295–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, B. (2005). Executive coaching: A conceptual framework from an integrative review of practice and research human resource development review. 4(4).
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 567–605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2004). The three threats of action research: A discussion of methodological antidotes in the context of an information systems study. Decision Support Systems, 37(2), 265–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Pearson: FT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koortzen, P., & Oosthuizen, R. (2010). A competence executive coaching model. Human Resource Development Review, 36(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D., & Corrie, S. (2007). The modern scientist-practitioner: A guide to practice in psychology. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maltbia, T. E., Marsick, V. J., & Ghosh, R. (2014). Executive and organizational coaching: A review of insights drawn from literature to inform HRD practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(2), 161–183.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. (2013). Less is more: The executive coach’s experience of working on the telephone. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 7, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (1994). Understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 222–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passmore, J. (2007). An Integrative model for executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 59(1), 68–78.
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, J., & Fillery-Travis, A. (2011). A critical review of executive coaching research: A decade of progress and what’s to come. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 4(2), 70–88.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P. (1999). Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry. Management Learning, 30(2), 207–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, M. N., & Rojon, C. (2014). There’s no madness in my method: Explaining how your coaching research findings are built on firm foundations. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 7(1), 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, C. L., Teram, E., & Stalker, C. A. (2004). Integrating grounded theory and action research to develop sensitive practice with survivors of childhood sexual abuse. In K. Hammell & C. Carpenter (Eds.), Qualitative research in evidence-based rehabilitation (pp. 77–88). Edinburgh: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, G. B., & Oades, L. G. (2011). Coaching with self-determination theory in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice. International Journal of Evidence-Based Coaching and Mentoring, 9(2), 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Stober, D. R., Wildflower, L., & Drake, D. (2006). Evidence-based practice: A potential approach for effective coaching. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 4(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Stout-Rostron, S. (2009). The global initiatives in the coaching field. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 2(1), 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basic qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Susman, G., & Evered, R. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4), 582–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teram, E., Schachter, C., & Stalker, C.. (2005). The case for integrating grounded theory and participatory action research: Empowering clients to inform professional practice. Qualitative Health Research, 15(8), 1129–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terblanche, N. (2014). Knowledge sharing in the organizational context: Using social network analysis as a coaching tool. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 12(2), 146–164.
   Google Scholar
• Terblanche, N. H. D., Albertyn, R. M., & Van Coller-Peter, S. (2018). Using Transformative Transition Coaching to support leaders during career transitions. African Journal of Business Ethics, 12(1), 60–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & Van Vianen, A. (2013). Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastell, D. (2001). Barriers to effective knowledge management: Action research meets grounded theory. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 5(2), 628–639.
   Google Scholar
• Witherspoon, R., & White, R. P. (1996). Executive coaching: A continuum of roles. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48(2), 124.
   Google Scholar