The impact of power posing on self-efficacy and dispositional optimism in horse-assisted coaching

References

• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71–81). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, L., & Morin, L. (2010). The impact of executive coaching on self-efficacy related to management soft-skills. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731011010362
   Google Scholar
• Berkovits, I., Hancock, G. R., & Nevitt, J. (2000). Bootstrap resampling approaches for repeated measure designs: Relative robustness to sphericity and normality violations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 877–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerich, K., & Michel, A. (2016). Führungskräfte-Coaching bei Change Prozessen. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 60(4), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000226
   Google Scholar
• Bombari, D., Schmid Mast, M., & Pulfrey, C. (2017). Real and imagined power poses: Is the physical experience necessary after all? Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1341183
   Google Scholar
• Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1363–1368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610383437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16(2), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173489
   Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Schultz, J., & Fosse, N. E. (2018). P-curving a more comprehensive body of research on postural feedback reveals clear evidential value for power-posing effects: Reply to simmons and simonsohn (2017) (2017). Psychological Science, 29(4), 656–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617746749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, P. P. (2004). Reliabilitätsanalyse. In P. P. Eckstein (Ed.), Angewandte Statistik mit SPSS. Praktische Einführung für Wirtschaftswissenschaftler (pp. 289–306). Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Fliege, H., Rose, M., Bronner, E., & Klapp, B. F. (2002). Prädiktoren des Behandlungsergebnisses stationärer psychosomatischer Therapie. PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie, 52(2), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-20184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (2011). Can negative affect eliminate the power of first impressions? Affective influences on primacy and recency effects in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Friesenhahn, J. (2015). Unter sechs Augen. Die Wirkung von Pferden im Coaching. Coaching Magazin, 4, 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Glaesmer, H., Klotsche, J., Hoyer, J., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2008). Die deutsche Version des Life-Orientation-Tests (LOT-R) zum dispositionellen Optimismus und Pessimismus. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 16(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149.16.1.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomolla, A. (2014). Pferde haben Spiegelfunktion. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 8, 356–357.
   Google Scholar
• Greiffenhagen, S., & Buck-Werner, O N. (2011). Tiere als Therapie. Kynos.
   Google Scholar
• Gronau, Q. F., Van Erp, S., Heck, D. W., Cesario, J., Jonas, K. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2017). A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: The case of felt power. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1326760
   Google Scholar
• Hemingway, A., Carter, S., Callaway, A., Kavanagh, E., & Ellis, S. (2019). An exploration of the mechanism of action of an equine-assisted intervention. Animals, 9(6), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinz, A., Schumacher, J., Albani, C., Schmid, G., & Brähler, E. (2006). Bevölkerungsrepräsentative Normierung der Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Diagnostica, 52(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.52.1.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julius, H., Beetz, A., & Ragnarsson, S. (2017). Bindung und pferdegestützte Interventionen. Mensch & Pferd, 4, 40–153. https://doi.org/10.2378/mup2017.art23d
   Google Scholar
• Kirn, T., Echelmeyer, L., & Engberding, M. (2009). Imagination in der Verhaltenstherapie. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Konir, G. (2012). Pferdegestütztes Coaching. Menschliche Potenzialentwicklung durch tierische Hilfe. Books on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Körner, R., Petersen, L.-E., & Schütz, A. (2019). Brand engagement in self-concept: Scale properties and the global nature of the construct. Current Psychology, 38(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9584-x
   Google Scholar
• Körner, R., & Schütz, A. (2018). Power posing. In V. Zeigler-Hill, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–4). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, K., Flauger, B., Farmer, K., & Maros, K. (2011). Horses (equus caballus) use human local enhancement cues and adjust to human attention. Animal Cognition, 14(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0352-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larro-Jacob, A. (2007). Imaginative Techniken im Coaching. Imagination im Coaching – the way to intuition as a valuable resource. Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching, 14, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11613-007-0007-y
   Google Scholar
• Lumley, T., Diehr, P., Emerson, S., & Chen, L. (2002). The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annual Review of Public Health, 23(1), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, S. (2009). Pferde als Medium im Coaching: Natürlich, ehrlich und nachhaltig!. Coaching Magazin, 4, 42–43.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, K., Takimoto-Inose, A., & Hasegawa, T. (2018). Cross-modal perception of human emotion in domestic horses (equus caballus). Scientific Reports, 8(1), 8660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26892-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Northoff, G. (2008). Are our emotional feelings relational? A neurophilosophical investigation of the james–lange theory. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 501–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9086-2
   Google Scholar
• Page, N., & de Haan, E. (2016). Zeigt Führungskräfte-Coaching Wirkung? Und wenn ja, wie wirkt es? In R. Wegener, M. Loebbert, & A. Fritze (Eds.), Coaching und gesellschaft (pp. 129–144). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Price, T. F., Peterson, C. K., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2012). The emotive neuroscience of embodiment. Motivation and Emotion, 36(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9258-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of research design. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, K. (2020). Pferde, Forschung & Psychologie. Wissenschaftliche Befunde zu Fähigkeiten von Pferden und deren Wirkung auf Menschen. Books on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, K., & Brämig, S. (2020). Power Posing Übungen in pferdegestützten Coachings. Coaching | Theorie & Praxis, 6(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40896-020-00036-y
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, K., Rötters, A., & Oebel, L. (2018). Können Pferde als Co-Trainer agieren? Individuelle Reaktionen von Pferden in der Persönlichkeitsentwicklung auf unterschiedliche Klienten. Tiergestützte Therapie, Pädagogik & Fördermaßnahmen, 1, 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, K., & Steinhoff, J. (2019). Einfluss von pferdegestützten Coachings auf die Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Coaching | Theorie & Praxis, 5(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40896-019-0028-5
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R. (1999). Self-regulatory processes in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Journal of Health Psychology, 4(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539900400208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs selbstwirksame Schulen. Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (2002). Das Konzept der Selbstwirksamkeit. In M. Jerusalem, & D. Hopf (Eds.), Selbstwirksamkeit und Motivationsprozesse in Bildungsinstitutionen (pp. 28–53). Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, L. E., Coberley, C. R., & Pope, J. E. (2016). Direct and mediated relationships between participation in a telephonic health coaching program and health behavior, Life satisfaction, and optimism. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 58(7), 690–695. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000767
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2017). Power posing: P-curving the evidence. Psychological Science, 28(5), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616658563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderkvist, S., Ohlén, K., & Dimberg, U. (2018). How the experience of emotion is modulated by facial feedback. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 42(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-017-0264-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar