Performance matters: students’ perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Coach adoption factors

References

• Aruguete, M. S. (2017). Recognizing challenges and predicting success in first-generation university students. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 18(2).
   Google Scholar
• Athanasopoulou, A., & Dopson, S. (2018). A systematic review of executive coaching outcomes: Is it the journey or the destination that matters the most? The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman, A., Moscardo, G., & Gray, D. E. (2016). Challenges for the theory and practice of business coaching: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316673177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bounthavong, M., Suh, K., Christopher, M. L. D., Veenstra, D. L., Basu, A., & Devine, E. B. (2020). Providers’ perceptions on barriers and facilitators to prescribing naloxone for patients at risk for opioid overdose after implementation of a national academic detailing program: A qualitative assessment. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 16(8), 1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.10.015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Ramaswamy, S., Chui, M., Allas, T., Dahlstrom, P., Henke, N., & Trench, M. (2017). Artificial intelligence: The next digital frontier? McKinsey Global Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Capstick, M. K., Harrell-Williams, L. M., Cockrum, C. D., & West, S. L. (2019). Exploring the effectiveness of academic coaching for academically at-risk college students. Innovative Higher Education, 44(3), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-9459-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., & Jiang, H. (2020). How do AI-driven chatbots impact user experience? Examining gratifications, perceived privacy risk, satisfaction, loyalty, and continued use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(4), 592–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1834296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciechanowski, L., Przegalinska, A., Magnuski, M., & Gloor, P. A. (2019). In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human–chatbot interaction. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92(March), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.01.055
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erling, E. J., & Richardson, J. T. (2010). Measuring the academic skills of university students: Evaluation of a diagnostic procedure. Assessing Writing, 15(3), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
   Google Scholar
• Fulmer, R., Joerin, A., Gentile, B., Lakerink, L., & Rauws, M. (2018). Using psychological artificial intelligence (Tess) to relieve symptoms of depression and anxiety: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health, 5(4), e64. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.9782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffney, H., Mansell, W., & Tai, S. (2019). Conversational agents in the treatment of mental health problems: Mixed-method systematic review. JMIR Mental Health, 6(10), e14166. https://doi.org/10.2196/14166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graßmann, C., & Schermuly, C. C. (2020). Coaching with artificial intelligence: Concepts and capabilities. Human Resource Development Review, 20(1), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320982891
   Google Scholar
• Harkous, H., Fawaz, K., Shin, K. G., & Aberer, K. (2017, July 12–14). Pribots: Conversational privacy with chatbots. Twelfth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security ({SOUPS} 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Coach Federation (ICF). (2020). 2020 ICF Global Coaching Study: Executive summary. https://coachfederation.org/app/uploads/2020/09/FINAL_ICF_GCS2020_ExecutiveSummary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, A., Earnest, J., De Mori, G., & Silvagni, G. (2010). The experiences of students from refugee backgrounds at universities in Australia: Reflections on the social, emotional and practical challenges. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feq001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. W., Jo, H. I., & Lee, B. G. (2019). The study on the factors influencing on the behavioral intention of chatbot service for the financial sector: Focusing on the UTAUT model. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 20(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.1.41
   Google Scholar
• Kombarakaran, F. A., Yang, J. A., Baker, M. N., & Fernandes, P. B. (2008). Executive coaching: It works!. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.60.1.78
   Google Scholar
• Koulopoulos, T., & Keldsen, D. (2016). Gen Z effect: The six forces shaping the future of business. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kyngäs, H., & Kaakinen, P. (2020). Deductive content analysis. In H. Kyngäs, K. Mikkonen, & M. Kääriäinen (Eds.), The application of content analysis in Nursing Science Research (pp. 23–30). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lattie, E. G., Lipson, S. K., & Eisenberg, D. (2019). Technology and college student mental health: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehner, M. (2020). WhatsApp, WeChat and Facebook Messenger Apps – Global useage of Messaging Apps, Penetration and Statistics. https://www.messengerpeople.com/global-messenger-usage-statistics/, 25 October 2021
   Google Scholar
• Molyn, J. (2018). The role and effectiveness of coaching in increasing career decision self-efficacy, outcome expectations and employability efforts of Higher Education students [Doctoral dissertation, University of Greenwich]. https://core.ac.uk/download/200749863.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Panetta, K. (2018, August 16). Widespread artificial intelligence, biohacking, new platforms and immersive experiences dominate this year’s Gartner Hype Cycle. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/5-trends-emerge-in-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(3), 258–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889909365539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2020). The influence of psychological, motivational, and behavioral factors on university students’ achievements: The mediating effect of academic adjustment. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2020-0065
   Google Scholar
• Siau, K. L., & Yang, Y. (2017, May 18–19). Impact of Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Machine Learning on sales and marketing. Midwest United States Association for Information Systems 12th Annual Conference, 18–19 May 2017, Springfield. http://aisel.aisnet.org/mwais2017/48
   Google Scholar
• Terblanche, N. (2020). A design framework to create Artificial Intelligence Coaches. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 18(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.24384/b7gs-3h05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terblanche, N., & Cilliers, D. (2020). Factors that influence users’ adoption of being coached by an Artificial Intelligence Coach. Philosophy of Coaching: An International Journal, 5(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.22316/poc/05.1.06
   Google Scholar
• Terblanche, N., Passmore, J., & Myburgh, J. (2021). African organisational coaching practice: Exploring approaches used, and the factors influencing coaches’ fees. South African Journal of Business Management, 52(1), a2395. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v52i1.2395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & van Vianen, A. E. (2014). Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.837499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Boer-Visschedijk, G. C., Blankendaal, R. A. M., Boonekamp, R. C., & Eikelboom, A. R. (2021). Human-versus Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Niewerburgh, C. (ed.). (2018). Coaching in education: Getting better results for students, educators, and parents. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2012.14.2.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar