Framing Environmental Risks and Natural Disasters in Factual Entertainment Television

References

• Adams, J. (2003). Risk and morality: Three framing devices. In R. V. Ericson & A. Doyle (Eds.), Risk and morality (pp. 87–103). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, V. (2010). Media and risk: Old and new research directions. Journal of Risk Research, 13(1), 5–18. doi:10.1080/13669870903135953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boddy, W. (2000). Weather porn and the battle for eyeballs: Promoting digital television in the USA and UK. In J. Fullerton & A. Söderbergh Widding (Eds.), Moving images: From Edison to the webcam (pp. 133–147). London: John Libbey.
   Google Scholar
• Buell, F. (2010). A short history of environmental apocalypse. In S. Skrimshire (Ed.), Future ethics: Climate change and apocalyptic imagination (pp. 13–36). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Button, G. V. (2002). Popular media reframing of man-made disasters: A cautionary tale. In S. M. Hoffman & A. Oliver-Smith (Eds.), Catastrophe & culture: The anthropology of disaster (pp. 143–158). Santa Fe, NM: SAR.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, K., & Schnell, F. (2005). Introduction: Framing political issues in American politics. In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Eds.), Framing American politics (pp. 1–17). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, V. (2009). The extinct animal show: The paleoimagery tradition and computer generated imagery in factual television programs. Public Understanding of Science, 18(2), 199–213. doi:10.1177/0963662507081246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner, J. (2002). Performing the real: Documentary diversions. Television and New Media, 3(3), 255–269. doi:10.1177/152747640200300302
   Google Scholar
• Cottle, S. (1998). Ulrich Beck, ‘risk society’ and the media: A catastrophic view? European Journal of Communication, 13(1), 5–32. doi:10.1177/0267323198013001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. (2009, August 19). No job and fourteen mouths to feed, but in our culture, still a star. The Globe and Mail, p. R3.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorelangton, R. (2002, October 3). TV express. The Daily Express, p. 53.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, B. (2009, January 8). Reality TV. The Sudbury Star, p. D4.
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, R., Tschida, D., Dixon, M., Cherry, K., Steuber, K., & Airne, D. (2005). The West Wing and depictions of the American presidency: Expanding the domains of framing in political communication. Communication Quarterly, 53(4), 505–522. doi:10.1080/01463370500102228
   Google Scholar
• James, M. (2009, May 31). Pick of the day. The Sunday Times, p. 60.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2013). The lexicon of offence: The meanings of torture, porn, and “torture porn.” In F. Atwood, V. Campbell, I. Q. Hunter, & S. Lockyer (Eds.), Controversial images (pp. 186–200). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kakoudaki, D. (2002). Spectacles of history: Race relations, melodrama, and the science fiction/disaster film. Camera Obscura, 17(2), 108–153.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, S. (2006). Disaster movies: The cinema of catastrophe. London: Wallflower.
   Google Scholar
• Kilborn, R. (2003). Staging the real: Factual TV programming in the age of ‘Big Brother’. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1999). Researching risk and the media. Health, Risk & Society, 1(1), 55–69. doi:10.1080/13698579908407007
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4(1), 70–81. doi:10.1080/17524030903529749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, B. (1999). Science on television: The narrative of science documentary. Luton: The Pantaneto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, L., & Cottle, S. (2009). Visualizing climate change: Television news and ecological citizenship. International Journal of Communication, 3, 920–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, B., & Morse, S. (2007). The role of news media in natural disaster risk and recovery. Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 365–373. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palfreman, J. (2002). Bringing science to a television audience. Nieman Reports, 56(3), 32–4.
   Google Scholar
• Pantti, M., Wahl-Jorgensen, K., & Cottle, S. (2012). Disasters and the media. Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, J. (2000, July 14). Screen: And the Oscar for best actor goes to the weather! The Guardian, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Lugo, M. (2004). Media uses in disaster situations: A new focus on the impact phase. Sociological Inquiry, 74(2), 210–225. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2004.00087.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. (2007, April 22). Between desire and loathing. The Sunday Telegraph, p. 25.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, J. (2004). Multi-platform event television: Reconceptualising our relationship with television. The Communication Review, 7(4), 363–369. doi:10.1080/10714420490886961
   Google Scholar
• Rosteck, T., & Frentz, T. S. (2009). Myth and multiple readings in environmental rhetoric: The case of an inconvenient truth. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 95(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/00335630802621086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvador, M., & Norton, T. (2011). The flood myth in the age of global climate change. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 5(1), 45–61. doi:10.1080/17524032.2010.544749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steemers, J. (2004). Selling television: British television in the global marketplace. London: BFI.
   Google Scholar
• Svensen, H. (2009). The end is nigh: A history of natural disasters. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, B. (2010). Strategies to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. In P. D'Angelo & J. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 84–109), London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vasterman, P., Yzermans, C., & Dirkzwager, A. (2005). The role of the media and media hypes in the aftermath of disasters. Epidemiologic Reviews, 27(1), 107–114. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxi002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weik von Mossner, A. (2011). Reframing Katrina: The color of disaster in Spike Lee's When the Levees Broke. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 5(2), 146–165. doi:10.1080/17524032.2011.562520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley, H. (2011). Beautiful images in spectacular clarity: Spectacular television, landscape programming and the question of (tele)visual pleasure. Screen, 52(2), 233–248. doi:10.1093/screen/hjr004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. (2008). Rethinking the nature of disaster: From failed instruments of learning to a post-social understanding. Social Forces, 87(2), 1115–1138. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar