424
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Fuelling an Environmental Conflict through Information Diffusion Strategies

References

  • Aitken, M. (2010). Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy, 38, 1834–1841. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060
  • Aitken, M., McDonald, S., & Strachan, P. (2008). Locating ‘power’ in wind power planning processes: The (not so) influencial role of local objectors. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51, 777–799. doi:10.1080/09640560802423566
  • Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement. (2010). Projet d'aménagement du parc éolien de l'Érable dans les municipalités de Saint-Ferdinand, Sainte-Sophie-d'Halifax et Saint-Pierre-Baptiste: Rapport d'enquête et d'audience publique [Implementation of the L'Érable wind farm project in the municipalities of Saint-Ferdinand, Sainte-Sophie-d'Halifax, and Saint-Pierre-Baptiste: Investigation and public hearings report]. Québec: Author.
  • Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement. (2013). How to participate. Retrieved May, 2013, from www.bape.gouv.qc.ca.
  • Beauchamp, A. (1997). Environnement et consensus social [Environment and social consensus]. Montréal: Éditions l'Essentiel.
  • Bell, D., Gray, T., & Haggett, C. (2005). The ‘social gap’ in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses. Environmental Politics, 14, 460–477. doi:10.1080/09644010500175833
  • Bergmans, A. (2008). Meaningful communication among experts and affected citizens on risk: Challenge or impossibility? Journal of Risk Research, 11(1 & 2), 175–193. doi:10.1080/13669870701797301
  • Bernoux, P. (2009). La sociologie des organisations [The sociology of organizations] (6th ed.). Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
  • Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw software for network visualization. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.
  • Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. (2002). UCINET for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  • Brashers, D. E. (2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communication, 51, 477–497. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x
  • Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1287–1335. doi:10.1086/228667
  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. In P. Lopes & M. Durfee (Eds.), The diffusion of ideas and things: The annals of the American academy of political and social science (Vol. 566, pp. 37–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Canada. (2006). Census of agriculture. Statistics Canada. Retrieved August, 2013, from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/ca-ra2006/index-eng.htm.
  • Cox, R. (2010). Environmental communication and the public sphere (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1977). L'acteur et le système (1st ed.). Paris: Éditions Du Seuil.
  • Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Westport: Praeger.
  • Depoe, S. P., Delicath, J. W., & Aepli Elsenbeer, M.-F. (2004). Communication and public participation in environmental decision making. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Devine-Wright, P. (2005). Beyon NYMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, 8(2), 125–139. doi:10.1002/we.124
  • French, M. (1985). Beyond power. New York: Summit Books.
  • Friedberg, E. (1993). Le pouvoir et la règle: Dynamiques de l'action organisée [Power and rule: Dynamics of organized action]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
  • Gariépy, M. (2006). Ouverture du marché de l'électricité, apprentissage organisationnel et évaluation environnementale au Québec [Opening of the electricity market, organizational learning and environmental assessment in Quebec]. In L. Simard, L. Lepage, J.-M. Fourniau, M. Gariépy, & M. Gauthier (Eds.), Le débat public en apprentissage: aménagement et environnement [Learning through social debate: Planning and environment] (pp. 257–270). Paris: L'Harmattan.
  • Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldman, A. I. (1972). Toward a theory of social power. Philosophical Studies, 23, 221–268. doi:10.1007/BF00356228
  • Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177705148
  • Heiss, B., & Monge, P. R. (2007, May). Organizational network implications of relating as communicating: Recommendations for prudent uses of the multitheoretical, multilevel framework. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
  • Johnson, B. B. (1987). Accounting for the social context of risk communication. Science & Technology Studies, 5(3/4), 103–111.
  • Khan, J. (2003). Wind power planning in three Swedish municipalities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46, 563–581. doi:10.1080/0964056032000133161
  • Knobloch, L. K., & Solomon, D. H. (2002). Information seeking beyond initial interaction: Negotiating relational uncertainty within close relationships. Human Communication Research, 28, 243–257.
  • Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 342–369. doi:10.2307/2393394
  • Laird, F. N. (1993). Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision making. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18, 341–361. doi:10.1177/016224399301800305
  • Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1995). Social approaches to communication. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Minton, J. W. (1997). Essentials of negotiation. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
  • Maillé, M.-È., & Saint-Charles, J. (2013, June). Distrust as a tool in an environmental conflict. Paper presented at the Conference on Communication and Environment, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Maillé, M.-È., & Saint-Charles, J. (2012). Social cohesion in a community divided by a wind farm project. Human Ecology Review, 19(2), 83–98.
  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nadaï, A., & van der Horst, D. (2010). Wind power planning, landscapes and publics. Land Use Policy, 27, 181–184. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.009
  • Norton, T., Sias, P., & Brown, S. (2011). Experiencing and managing uncertainty about climate change. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39, 290–309. doi:10.1080/00909882.2011.585397
  • Oliver, P., Marwell, G., & Teixeira, R. (1985). A theory of the critical mass. I. Interdependence, group heterogenity, and the production of collective action. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 522–556. doi:10.1086/228313
  • Québec. (2011). Estimation de la population des municipalités du Québec au 1er juillet des années 1996 à 2010 [Population estimates of municipalities in Quebec every July 1st from 1996 to 2010]. Institut de la statistique du Québec. Retrieved August, 2013, from http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/donstat/societe/demographie/dons_regnl/regional/index.htm#municip.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  • Scherer, C. W., & Cho, H. (2003). A social network contagion theory of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 23, 261–267. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00306
  • Senecah, S. L. (2004). The trinity of voice: The role of practical theory in planning and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental participatory processes. In S. P. Depoe, J. W. Delicath, & M.-F. Aepli Elsenbeer (Eds.), Communication and public participation in environmental decision making (pp. 13–33). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Simard, L., Lepage, L., Fourniau, J.-M., Gariépy, M., & Gauthier, M. (2006). Le débat public en apprentissage: Aménagement et environnement [Learning through social debate: Planning and environment]. Paris: L'Harmattan.
  • Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216–269. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216
  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1990). Information and organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Teo, M. M., & Loosemore, M. (2011). Community-based protest against construction projects: A case study of movement continuity. Construction Management and Economics, 29(2), 131–144. doi:10.1080/01446193.2010.535545
  • Valente, T. W., & Davis, R. L. (1999). Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. In P. Lopes & M. Durfee (Eds.), The diffusion of ideas and things (pp. 55–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: American Academy of Political and Social Science.
  • Valente, T. W., & Pumpuang, P. (2007). Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Education & Behavior, 34, 881–896. doi:10.1177/1090198106297855
  • Walker, G. B. (2007). Public participation as participatory communication in environmental policy decision-making: From concepts to structured conversations. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 1(1), 99–110. doi:10.1080/17524030701334342
  • Walker, G., & Devine-Wright, P. (2008). Community renewable energy: What should it mean? Energy Policy, 36, 497–500. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019
  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wolsink, M. (2007). Wind power implementation. The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 1188–1207. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.