Overcoming Environmental Challenges by Antagonizing Environmental Protesters: The Turkish Government Discourse against Anti-hydroelectric Power Plants Movements

References

• Bayar, A. H. (1996). The developmental state and economic policy in turkey. Third World Quarterly, 17, 773–786. doi:10.1080/01436599615371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buscher, B., Sullivan S., Neves, K., Igoe, J., & Brockington, D. (2012). Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23(2), 4–30. doi:10.1080/10455752.2012.674149
   Google Scholar
• Cavdar, G. (2012). Heterogeneous transformation of Islamism: The justice and development party and the environment. The Arab World Geographer, 15(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, K., & Scraton, P. (2001). Criminalization. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage dictionary of criminology (pp. 95–97). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2010). Environmental communication and the public sphere (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, K. (1999). Articulation theory: A discursive grounding for rhetorical practice. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 32, 334–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depoe, S. P., Delicath, J. W., & Elsenbeer, M.-A. (Eds.). (2004). Communication and public participation in environmental decision-making. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. (2007). Green political thought. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eralp, A. (1990). The politics of Turkish development strategies. In A. Finkel & N. Sirman, (Eds.), Turkish state, Turkish society (pp. 219–258). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Francisco, R. A. (2005). The dictator's dilemma. In C. Davenport, H. Johnston, & C. Mueller (Eds.), Repression and mobilization (pp. 58–81). Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., & Scraton, P. (1981). Law, class and control. In M. Fitzgerald, G. McLennan & J. Pawson (Eds.), Crime and society: Readings in history and theory (pp. 460–494). London: Routledge and Kegan.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, J. (2004). Decide, announce, defend: Turning the NEPA process into an advocacy tool rather than a decision-making tool. In S. P. Depoe, J. W. Delicath, & M.-A. Elsenbeer (Eds.), Communication and public participation in environmental decision-making (pp. 99–112). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D., & Martin, B. (2006). Repression, backfire, and the theory of transformative events. Mobilization, 11, 249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopke, J. E. (2012). Water gives life: framing an environmental justice movement in the mainstream and alternative salvadoran press. Environmental Communication, 6, 365–382.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, S. B., & Miller, C. R. (1996). The low-level radioactive waste siting controversy in North Carolina: Toward a rhetorical model of risk communication. In C. C. Herndl & S. B. Brown (Eds.), Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America (pp. 111–140). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Killingsworth, J. M., & Palmer, J. S. (1992). Ecospeak: Rhetoric and environmental politics in America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Killingsworth, J. M., & Palmer, J. S. (1996). Millenial ecology: The apocalyptic narrative from Silent Spring to global warming. In C. C. Herndl & S. B. Brown (Eds.), Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America (pp. 21–45). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1999). Politics, polemics and academics: An interview by Paul Bowman. Parallax, 5(2), 93–107. doi:10.1080/135346499249722
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, J. I. (1993). The logic of competing information campaigns: Conflict over old growth and the spotted owl. Communication Monographs, 60, 239–257. doi:10.1080/03637759309376311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T. (2007). Muting the voice of the local in the age of the global: How communication practices compromised public participation in India's Allain Dunhangan environmental impact assessment. Environmental Communication, 1, 171–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKerrow, R. E. (1989). Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis. Communication Monographs, 56(2), 91–111. doi:10.1080/03637758909390253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. P. (1993). Constructing irreconcilable conflict: The function of synecdoche in the spotted owl controversy. Communication Monographs, 60, 258–274. doi:10.1080/03637759309376312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. P. (2004). Eulogy for Tobe West: On the agitation and control of a salvage-rider timber sale. In S. Senecah (Ed.), The environmental communication yearbook (vol. 1, pp. 33–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Okumusoğlu, Y. (2012). HES çılgınlıgı: -Yakup Okumusoglu ile söylesi [Hydroelectric power plant madness: An interview with Yakup Okumusoglu]. Retrieved from http://www.suhakki.org/2012/02/hes-cilginligi-yakup-okumusoglu-ile-soylesi-birinci-bolum
   Google Scholar
• Oravec, C. L., & Clarke, T. (2004). Naming, interpretation, policy, and poetry: Communicating cedar breaks national monument. In S. Senecah (Ed.), The environmental communication yearbook (vol 1., pp. 1–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Peeples, J. (2005). Aggressive mimicry: The rhetoric of wise use and the environmental movement. In S. Senecah (Ed.), The environmental communication yearbook (vol. 2, pp. 1–17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, T. R., & Horton, C. C. (1995). Rooted in the soil: How understanding the perspectives of landowners can enhance the management of environmental disputes. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81(2), 139–166. doi:10.1080/00335639509384106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scraton, P., & Chadwick, K. (1991). Challenging the new orthodoxies: The theoretical imperatives and political priorities of critical criminology. In K. Stenson & D. Cowell (Eds.), The politics of crime control (pp. 161–185). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smerecnik, K. R., & Renegar, V. (2010). Capitalistic agency: The rhetoric of BP's Helios power campaign. Environmental Communication, 4, 152–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, S. (2005). Eco-terrorism or justified resistance? Radical environmentalism and the “war on terror”. Politics & Society, 33, 425–447. doi:10.1177/0032329205278462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, T. (2008). Reframing ecotage as ecoterrorism: News and the discourse of fear. Environmental Communication, 2(1), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. B. (2004). The roadless areas initiative as national policy: Is public participation an oxymoron? In S. P. Depoe, J. W. Delicath, & M.-A. Elsenbeer (Eds.), Communication and public participation in environmental decision-making (pp. 113–135). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar