Dynamic Discourse Coalitions on hydro-fracking in Europe and the United StatesFootnote

† Tamara Metze and Jennifer Dodge have contributed equally to this article.

References

• Advocates for Cheery Valley, Inc.; Advocates for Morris; Advocates of Springfield; Alec Baldwin; American Academy of Pediatrics, District II, NYS; Andes Works!; …. Yuka Honda. (2012). Letter to Governor Cuomo on fracking. Physicians for Social Responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.psr.org/resources/letter-to-governor-cuomo-on-fracking.html
   Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E. (2015). Shale we drill? Discourse dynamics in UK fracking debates. Journal of Environmental Planning and Policy, 1–17. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1053111. (Advanced access).
   Google Scholar
• Bouma, J., & Marijnissen, H. (2013, April 12). Schaliegas in Nederland boren, of niet? Trouw. Retrieved from http://www.trouw.nl/tr/nl/5009/Archief/article/detail/3424480/2013/04/12/Schaliegas-In-Nederland-boren-of-niet.dhtml
   Google Scholar
• Brabants Dagblad. (2011, October 22). Boxtelaren in actie tegen schaliegas.
   Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. J. (2010). From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82–98. doi: 10.1080/17524030903522397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkely, H. (2000). Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(6), 727–748. doi: 10.1068/c9905j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (2012, April 15). In hydrofracking debate, can science be bought? The Ithaca Journal, n.p.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N. (2007). The politics of the environment: Ideas, activism, policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cathles III, L., Brown, M. L., Taam, M., & Hunt, A. (2012). A commentary on “the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas in shale formations” by R.W. Howarth, R. Santoro, and Anthony Ingraffea. Climate Change 2012 (113), 525–535.
   Google Scholar
• Christopherson, S. (2011, August 14). Hydrofracking a boom-bus endeavor. Albany Times Union online. Retrieved February 5, 2014, from http://www.timesunion.com/opinion/article/Hydrofracking-a-boom-bust-endeavor-1971392.php
   Google Scholar
• Cleavitt, N., Evett-Miller, J., & Wraight, S. (2011). The Dryden Listening Project: A sampling of community opinions on natural gas production. Dryden Listening Project. Unpublished report.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M., Rattle, I., & Van Alstine, J. (2014). Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis. Energy Policy, 73, 427–438. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Telegraaf. (2011, June 4). Brabant beeft om schaliegas.
   Google Scholar
• De Telegraaf. (2013, September 19). Boren naar schaliegas uitgesteld; “Nieuw onderzoek nodig”.
   Google Scholar
• De Volkskrant. (2013, August 23). Schaliegas (editorial).
   Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., & Bouwen, R. (2012). Issue framing in conversations for change: Discursive interaction strategies for ‘doing differences’. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48(2), 168–193. doi: 10.1177/0021886312438858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, J. (2015). The deliberative potential of civil society organizations: Framing hydraulic fracturing in New York. Policy Studies, 36(3), 249–266. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2015.1065967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, J., & Metze, T. (working paper). Hydraulic fracturing as an interpretive problem: Lessons on energy controversies in Europe and the US.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, J., & Lee, J. (2015). Framing dynamics and policy gridlock: The curious case of hydraulic fracturing in New York. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1116378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. M., & Bolsen, T. (2011) Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. Journal of Communication, 61, 659–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01562.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gashler, K. (2009, July 14). Town to allow longer lake docks. The Ithaca Journal, p. A3.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, B. (2008, September 16). No toxic byproducts from hydraulic fracturing. Albany Times Union, p. A10.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, C. (2012, November 18). Election shows Tier wants drilling now. Press & Sun-Bulletin, p. C2.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (2009). Authoritative governance: Policy-making in the age of mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, M. (2012, February 29). League of women voters talks up walking lightly on the earth. The Ithaca Journal, n.p.
   Google Scholar
• Hazlitt, J. (2011, September 02). Vineyards, fracking cannot co-exist. The Ithaca Journal, p. n/a. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/887053306?accountid=14168
   Google Scholar
• Herber, R., & de Jager, J. (2010). Oil and gas in the Netherlands – is there a future? Netherlands Journal of Geosciences-Geologie en mijnbouw, 89(2), 91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, R., Santoro, T., & Ingraffea, A. (2011). Methane and the greenhouse gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change, 2011 (106), 679–690. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0061-5
   Google Scholar
• Jacquet, J., & Stedman, R. C. (2011). Natural gas landowner coalitions in New York state: Emerging benefits of collective natural resource management. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 26(1), 62–91.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1987). Contested science in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science, 17(2), 195–230. doi: 10.1177/030631287017002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, R., & Debbané, A. M. (2005). Scaling discourse analysis: Experiences from Hermanus, South Africa and Walvis Bay, Namibia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 257–276. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339786
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, C. (2008, April 8). There's Gas in Those Hills. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/08/business/08gas.html?_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Lauriello, M. P. (2012, January 31). Guest viewpoint: Drilling could jump-start N.Y. economy. Press & Sun-Bulletin, p. A6.
   Google Scholar
• Leighton, M. (2010, January 25). Drilling chemicals no real mystery: Companies reports to state officials should be enough. Press & Sun-Bulletin, p. A8.
   Google Scholar
• Letter to the editor. (2013, August 31). De Volkskrant.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R., Gray, B., & Elliott M. (2003). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matz, J., & Renfrew, D. (2014). Selling “fracking”: Energy in depth and the Marcellus Shale. Environmental Communication, 9(3), 288–306. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.929157
   Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2010). Innovation Ltd.: Boundary work in deliberative governance in land use planning. Delft: Eburon Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2014). Fracking the debate: Frame shifts and boundary work in the Duth decision making on shale gas. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2014.941462 . (Advanced access.)
   Google Scholar
• NRC Handelsblad. (2011, May 12). Fransen bannen schaliegaswinning; Boormethode vervuilt grond-water.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, J. I. (2005). Jürgen Habermas's theory of communicative rationality: The foundational distinction between communicative and strategic action. Society Theory and Practice, 31(4), 513–532. doi: 10.5840/soctheorpract200531424
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Kroepsch, A. (2003). Framing science: The stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(2), 36–70. doi: 10.1177/1081180X02251047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Mooney, C. (2007). Framing science. Science, 316(5821), 56–70. doi: 10.1126/science.1142030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, S. (2012, January 11). Studies split on drilling. Press & Sun-Bulletin, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 385–403. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaliegas niet meer nodig—letter to the editors. (2011, March 10) Brabants Dagblad.
   Google Scholar
• Shackford, S. (2009, November 19). Ithaca gas protesters: Payout not worth risk. Ithaca Journal. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/378069435?accountid=14166
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. A., & Petersen, A. (2014). Variations on reliability: Connecting climate predictions to climate policy. In M. Boumans, G. Hon, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Error and uncertainty in scientific practice (pp. 137–156). London: Pickering & Chatto.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3): 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelling, J. (2013, August 7). Fracking Deceit Must be Exposed. Albany Times Union, p. C2. Retrieved from http://infoweb.newsbank.com.dbgateway.nysed.gov/iw-search/we/InfoWeb
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, R. (2009). Discourse, power, and energy conflict: Understanding Welsh renewable energy planning policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, 512–526. doi: 10.1068/c08100h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarka, J. (2004). Wind power, discourse coalitions and climate change: Breaking the stalemate? European Environment, 2004 (14), 317–330.
   Google Scholar
• Trouw. (2011, May19). Europa twijfelt aan omstreden schaliegas.
   Google Scholar
• van Weert, H. (2011, May 31). Boringen schaliegas UK opgeschort. Brabants Centrum. Retrieved from http://www.brabantscentrum.nl/Boring-schaliegas-UK-opgeschort/artikel
   Google Scholar
• Watson, P.E. (2009, March 11). Going for the gas: Make room for science and technology in Marcellus debate. Press & Sun-Bulletin, p. A9.
   Google Scholar
• Wilber, T. (2009a, January 22). Water tanks aid homes with gas in wells. Press & Sun-Bulletin, p. A1. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/441033851?accountid=14168
   Google Scholar
• Wilber, T. (2009b, September 14). EPA study may slow gas boom. Press & Sun-Bulletin, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Wilber, T. (2012). Under the surface: Fracking, fortunes, and the fate of the Marcellus Shale. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigg, W. (2010, May 14). Oil companies’ promises hollow. Albany Times Union, p. A10.
   Google Scholar