Constructing the vicarious experience of proximity in a Marcellus Shale public hearing

References

• Aakhus, M. (2007). Understanding ordinary democracy: The intersection of discourse and rhetorical analysis. In K. Tracy, J. P. McDaniel, & B. E. Gronbeck (Eds.), The prettier doll: Rhetoric, discourse and ordinary democracy (pp. 205–217). Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allegheny County Council. (2011). Marcellus Shale Public Hearing. Pittsburgh, PA: Sargent's Court Reporting Service.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News discourse. London: Continuum International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bierwisch, M. (1996). How much space gets into language? In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 31–76). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J., Dewilde, A., Stuyck, K., Peleman, K., & Meert, H. (2003). Space, experience and authority: Exploring attitudes towards refugee centers in Belgium. Journal of Language and Politics, 2(2), 311–331. doi: 10.1075/jlp.2.2.08blo
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, E. G. (1972). Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58(4), 396–407. doi: 10.1080/00335637209383138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. J. (2010). From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82–98. doi: 10.1080/17524030903522397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttny, R. (2015). Contesting hydrofracking during an inter-governmental hearing: Accounting by reworking or challenging the question. Discourse & Communication. OnlineFirst. doi:10.1177/1750481315576842.
   Google Scholar
• Buttny, R., & J. R. Cohen (2007). Drawing on the words of others at public hearings: Zoning, Wal-Mart, and the threat to the aquifer. Language in Society, 36(5), 735–756. doi: 10.1017/S0047404507070674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cap, P. (2013). Proximization: The pragmatics of symbolic distance crossing (Vol. 232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D., & T. Cerulli (2013). Cultural discourses of dwelling: Investigating environmental communication as a place-based practice. Environmental Communication, 7(1), 4–23. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2012.749296
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, S., & D. Hawhee. (1999). Ancient rhetorics for contemporary students. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Structures of news in the press. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication (pp. 69–93). Berlin, New York: W. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrin, S. I., & Morey, S. (Eds.) (2009). Ecosee: Image, rhetoric, nature. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Endres, D., Sprain, L., & Peterson, T. R. (2008). The imperative of praxis-based environmental communication research: Suggestions from the Step It Up 2007 National Research Project. Environmental Communication, 2(2), 237–245. doi: 10.1080/17524030802141794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. J. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, G. A. (1999). Vernacular voices: The rhetoric of publics and public spheres. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunsaker, D. M., & Smith, C. R. (1973). Rhetorical distance: A critical dimension. Western Speech, 37(4), 241–252. doi: 10.1080/10570317309373795
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, B., & Mando, J. (2015). Proximity and journalistic practice in environmental discourse: Experiencing ‘job blackmail’ in the news. Discourse & Communication, 9(1), 81–101. doi: 10.1177/1750481314555266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, S. B., & Miller, C. R. (1996). The low-level radioactive waste siting controversy in North Carolina: Toward a rhetorical model of risk communication. In C. G. Herndl & S. C. Brown (Eds.). Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America (pp. 111–140). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufer, D. S., & Butler, B. S. (2000). Designing interactive worlds with words: Principles of writing as representational composition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1972) Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81. doi: 10.1080/17524030903529749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matz, J., & Renfrew, D. (2014). Selling “fracking”: Energy in depth and the Marcellus Shale. Environmental Communication, 9(3), 288–306. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.929157
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (1997). Narrative authenticity. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 83–90. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.7.09nar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, M. (2004). Rhetorical distance in letter from Birmingham Jail. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 7(1), 23–35. doi: 10.1353/rap.2004.0027
   Google Scholar
• Peeples, J. (2011). Toxic sublime: Imaging contaminated landscapes. Environmental Communication, 5(4), 373–392. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2011.616516
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric (412). (J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffrin, D. (2009). Crossing boundaries: The nexus of time, space, person, and place in narrative. Language in Society, 38(4), 421–445. doi: 10.1017/S0047404509990212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer, S., Davis, S., & Thompson, J. L. (2013). Changing the conversation about climate change: A theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environmental Communication, 7(1), 42–62. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2012.753634
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (2007) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2011). Challenges of ordinary democracy: A case study in deliberation and dissent (Vol. 1). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., McDaniel, J. P., & Gronbeck, B. E. (2007). The prettier doll: Rhetoric, discourse and ordinary democracy. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Volkmer, I. (2008). Conflict-related media events and cultures of proximity. Media, War & Conflict, 1(1), 90–98. doi: 10.1177/1750635207087629
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M., O'Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008). Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization Studies, 29(7), 979–1002. doi: 10.1177/0170840607083105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelizer, B. (1990). Where is the author in American TV news? On the construction and presentation of proximity, authorship, and journalistic authority. Semiotica, 80(1–2), 37–48. doi: 10.1515/semi.1990.80.1-2.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar