Kangaroo Court? An Analysis of Social Media Justifications for Attitudes to Culling

References

• Aslin, H. J. (1996). Speaking of the wild: Australian attitudes to wildlife (Doctoral thesis). Australian National University. Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/7512/1/02Whole_Aslin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aslin, H. J., & Bennett, D. H. (2000). Wildlife and world views: Australian attitudes toward wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 5(2), 15–35. doi: 10.1080/10871200009359177
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics Website. (2011). Community engagement with nature conservation, Australia, 2011–12. Retrieved May 7, 2015, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Latestproducts/4602.0.00.002Main%20Features52011-12?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=4602.0.00.002&issue=2011-12&num=&view=
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ami, D., Boom, K., Boronyak, L., Townend, C., Ramp, D., Croft, D., & Bekoff, M. (2014). The welfare ethics of the commercial killing of free-ranging kangaroos: An evaluation of the benefits and costs of the industry. Animal Welfare, 23(1), 1–10. doi: 10.7120/09627286.23.1.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boom, K., Ben-Ami, D., Croft, D. B., Cushing, N., Ramp, D., & Boronyak, L. (2012). ‘Pest’ and resource: A legal history of Australia’s kangaroos. Animal Studies Journal, 1(1), 17–40.
   Google Scholar
• Boronyak-Vasco, L., & Perry, N. (2015). Using tradeable permits to improve efficiency, equity and animal protection in the commercial kangaroo harvest. Ecological Economics, 114, 159–167. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canberra Times. (2015, April 14). Bigger than usual kangaroo cull planned for 2015. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/CanberraTimes/
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. (2007). Public perceptions of animal pain and animal welfare. Proceedings of the Australian Animal Welfare Strategy Science Summit on Pain and Pain Management, 27. Retrieved June 3, 2015, from http://www.australiananimalwelfare.com.au/app/webroot/files/upload/files/grahame-coleman.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Delibes-Mateos, M., Smith, A. T., Slobodchikoff, C. N., & Swenson, J. E. (2011). The paradox of keystone species persecuted as pests: A call for the conservation of abundant small mammals in their native range. Biological Conservation, 144(5), 1335–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (DSEWPAC). (2013). Population, quota and harvest statistics, Australian Government, Canberra. Retrieved October 30, 2015, from http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/pages/d3f58a89-4fdf-43ca-8763-bbfd6048c303/files/kangaroo-statistics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, S., & Harshaw, H. W. (2013). Exploring “humane” dimensions of wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 18(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/10871209.2012.694014
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (2005). Analysing casual conversation. London: Equinox Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, A., & White, R. (2001). Animals and modernity: Changing human–animal relations, 1949–98. Journal of Sociology, 37(3), 219–238. doi: 10.1177/144078301128756319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. (1994). Functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hanisch-Kirkbride, S. L., Burroughs, J. P., & Riley, S. J. (2014). What are they thinking? Exploring layperson conceptualizations of wildlife health and disease. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19(3), 253–266. doi: 10.1080/10871209.2014.883653
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732–735. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1985). Historical trends in perceptions and uses of animals in 20th century America. Environmental History Review, 9(1), 19–33. doi: 10.2307/3984113
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (2013). Kangaroo industry background. Kangaroo Industry Association of Australia (KIAA). Retrieved October 30, 2015, from http://www.kangaroo-industry.asn.au/morinfo/kangaroo_industry_background.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic perspective on contemporary communication. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuwen, T. V., & Kress, G. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macnamara, J. (2013). Beyond voice: Audience-making and the work and architecture of listening as new media literacies. Continuum, 27(1), 160–175. doi: 10.1080/10304312.2013.736950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T. L., & Henry, K. L. (2009). Linking society and environment: A multilevel model of shifting wildlife value orientations in the Western United States. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 407–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00624.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. (2015). Why are people skeptical about climate change? Some insights from blog comments. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 153–168. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.999694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmet, M., Clarke, R., & Kautz, K. (2014). Social media semantics: Analysing meanings in multimodal online conversations. 35th International Conference on Information Systems, 1–16. Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmet, M. I. (2014). A social semiotic account of integrated new media marketing communications (Doctoral thesis). University of Wollongong, Australia. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4235/.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Link, M. W., Childs, J. H., Tesfaye, C. L., Dean, E., Stern, M., … Harwood, P. (2014). Social media in public opinion research: Executive summary of the Aapor Task Force on emerging technologies in public opinion research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(4), 788–794. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfu053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J. W., & Zappavigna, M. (2014). Researching language and social media: A student guide. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, E. S. (1995). Us and them: Scientists’ and animal rights campaigners’ views of the animal experimentation debate. Society & Animals, 3(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1163/156853095X00017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plumwood, V. (2003). Animals and ecology: Towards a better integration (Working Technical Paper). Australian National University. Received May 1, 2015, from http://hdl.handle.net/1885/41767
   Google Scholar
• Ramp, D. (2013). Bringing compassion to the ethical dilemma in killing kangaroos for conservation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 10(2), 267–272. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9442-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhiannon, L. (2015, March 3). Stop killing kangaroos for profit. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/lee.rhiannon/?fref=ts
   Google Scholar
• Teel, T. L., & Manfredo, M. J. (2010). Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology, 24(1), 128–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01374.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toepfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2015). Public Spheres in interaction: Comment sections of news websites as counterpublic spaces. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 465–488. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treves, A., Wallace, R. B., Naughton-Treves, L., & Morales, A. (2006). Co-managing human–wildlife conflicts: A review. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 11(6), 383–396. doi: 10.1080/10871200600984265
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. L. (2008). Australia's regulation of commercial use of wildlife: An absence of eco-logic (PhD thesis). Faculty of Law, University of Wollongong, 2008. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/789
   Google Scholar
• Voiceless: The animal protection institute. (2015, March 24). Kangaroos belong here not there. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/Voiceless.institute/?fref=ts
   Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13(5), 788–806. doi: 10.1177/1461444810385097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar