Fracking in the German Press: Securing Energy Supply on the Eve of The ‘Energiewende’ – A Quantitative Framing-Based Analysis

References

• Abdi, H., & Valentin, D. (2007). Multiple correspondence analysis. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (pp. 651–657). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. F., Ripple, R. D., & Aguilera, R. (2014). Link between endowments, economics and environment in conventional and unconventional gas reservoirs. Fuel, 126, 224–238. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.02.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ailworth, E., Gold, R., & Puko, T. (2015, January 6). Deep debt keeps oil firms pumping. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/deep-debt-keeps-oil-firms-pumping-1420594436
   Google Scholar
• Allan, S. (2002). Media, risk and science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A., Allan, S., Petersen, A., & Wilkinson, C. (2005). The framing of nanotechnologies in the British newspaper press. Science Communication, 27(2), 200–220. doi:10.1177/1075547005281472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkin, E. (2014). Fracking well blowout causes oil and chemical wastewater spill in North Dakota. Retrieved from http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/02/17/3299221/north-dakota-blowout/
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bažant, Z. P., Salviato, M., Chau, V. T., Visnawathan, H., & Zubelewicz, A. (2014). Why fracking works. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 81(10), 101010. doi:10.1115/1.4028192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (1994). Media (mis)communication on the science of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 3(3), 259–275. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/3/3/002
   Google Scholar
• BIO Intelligence Service. (2013). Analysis and presentation of the results of the public consultation “unconventional fossil fuels (e.g. shale gas) in Europe.” Final report prepared for European Commission DG Environment. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/07rISJ.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, M. (2014). Halliburton fracking spill mystery: What chemicals polluted an Ohio waterway? Retrieved from http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/07/halliburton-ohio-river-spill-fracking
   Google Scholar
• Boudet, H., Clarke, C., Bugden, D., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy, 65, 57–67. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruckner, T., & Zickfeld, K. (2008, July). Inverse integrated assessment of climate change: The guardrail approach. International Conference on Policy Modelling, July 2–4, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Brüggemann, M. (2014). Between frame setting and frame sending: How journalists contribute to news frames. Communication Theory, 24(1), 61–82. doi:10.1111/comt.12027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüggemeier, F.-J., & Engels, J. I. (Eds.). (2005). Natur- und Umweltschutz nach 1945 [Environmental protection after 1945]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe [BGR]. (2012). Abschätzung des Erdgaspotenzials aus dichten Tongesteinen (Schiefergas) in Deutschland [Estimating the natural gas potential in dense shales]. Retrieved from http://www.bgr.bund.de/DE/Themen/Energie/Downloads/BGR_Schiefergaspotenzial_in_Deutschland_2012.html
   Google Scholar
• Cario, I. (2006). Die deutschland-ermittler: Investigativer journalismus und die methoden der macher. Recherche-journalismus und kritische medienpolitik [The Germany-investigators: Investigative journalism and its methods. Muckraking and critical media policy]. Berlin: Lit-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Central European Petroleum [CEP]. (2015). Aufsuchungserlaubnisfelder in Deutschland [Exploration permits in Germany]. Retrieved from http://www.cepetro.de/aktivitaeten/articles/aufsuchungserlaubnisfelder.html
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C. E., Hart, P. S., Schuldt, J. P., Evensen, D. T. N., Boudet, H. S., Jacquet, J. B., & Stedman, R. C. (2015). Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. Energy Policy, 81(0), 131–140. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cmeciu, C., & Coman, C. (2016). Digital civic activism in Romania: Framing anti-chevron online protest community “faces.” Communicar, 47, 19–28. doi:10.3916/C47-2016-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2010). Environmental communication and the public sphere (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cuadrilla. (2011). Geomechanical study of Bowland shale seismicity: Executive summary. Cuadrilla resources. Retrieved from http://www.cuadrillaresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Executive-Summary-Geomechanical-Study-02–11–11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Curran, G. (2012). Contested energy futures: Shaping renewable energy narratives in Australia. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 236–244. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doey, L., & Kurta, J. (2011). Correspondence analysis applied to psychological research. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 7(1), 5–14. Retrieved from http://www.tqmp.org/Content/vol07-1/p005/p005.pdf. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.07.1.p005
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, A. M. (2015). Beyond science and hysteria: Reality and perceptions of environmental justice concerns surrounding Marcellus and Utica shale gas development. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 77(2). doi:10.5195/lawreview.2015.396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M., Matthes, J., & Pellicano, L. (2009). Nature, sources and effects of news framing. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 175–190). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, D., Jacquet, J. B., Clarke, C. E., & Stedman, R. C. (2014). What’s the ‘fracking’ problem? One word can’t say it all. The Extractive Industries and Society, 1(2), 130–136. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2014.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Ewen, C., Borchardt, D., Richter, S., & Hammerbacher, R. (2012). Risikostudie Fracking—Sicherheit und Umweltverträglichkeit der Fracking-Technologie für die Erdgasgewinnung aus unkonventionellen Quellen [Risk study fracking—Safety and environmental impact of fracking technology for natural gas production from unconventional resources]. Retrieved from http://dialog-erdgasundfrac.de/sites/dialog-erdgasundfrac.de/files/Ex_Risikostudie_Fracking_120518_webansicht.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, M. (1980). Manufacturing the news. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Germany Trade & Invest. (2014). Ukraine-Krise bringt neuen Schwung in transatlantische Wirtschaftspartnerschaft [Ukraine crisis relaunched the transatlantic economic partnership]. Retrieved from http://www.gtai.de/GTAI/Navigation/DE/Trade/Recht-Zoll/zoll,did=993192.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstone, M., & Looney, A. (2012). Paying too much for energy? The true costs of our energy choices. Daedalus, 141(2), 10–30. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. (2011). Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2), 7–25. doi:10.1177/1748048510386739
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. (Ed.). (2014). Media and the environment: Vol. 1. Environment, media and environmental communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., Pierce, J. J., Gallaher, S., Kagan, J., Crow, D. A., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Understanding a period of policy change: The case of hydraulic fracturing disclosure policy in Colorado. Review of Policy Research, 31(2), 65–87. doi:10.1111/ropr.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihlen, Ø, & Nitz, M. (2008). Framing contests in environmental disputes: Paying attention to media and cultural master frames. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/15531180701623478
   Google Scholar
• Informationsgemeinschaft zur Feststellung der Verbreitung von Werbeträgern [IVW]. (2014). Auflagenzahlen des 4. Quartals 2014 [Circulation for the 4th quarter 2014]. Retrieved from http://daten.ivw.eu/download/Ali20144.zip
   Google Scholar
• Jaspal, R., & Nerlich, B. (2014). Fracking in the UK press: Threat dynamics in an unfolding debate. Public Understanding Science, 23(3), 348–363. doi:10.1177/0963662513498835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Lemańcyzk, S. (2014). Fracking in the Polish press: Geopolitics and national identity. Energy Policy, 74, 253–261. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.00.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassotis, C. D., Tillitt, D. E., Davis, J. W., Hormann, A. M., & Nagel, S. C. (2013). Estrogen and androgen receptor activities of hydraulic fracturing chemicals and surface and ground water in a drilling-dense region. Endocrinology, 155(3), 897–907. doi:10.1210/en.2013-1697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kepplinger, H. M., Geiss, S., & Siebert, S. (2012). Framing scandals: Cognitive and emotional media effects. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 659–681. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01653.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-H., Besley, J. C., Oh, S.-H., & Kim, S. Y. (2013). Talking about bio-fuel in the news. Journalism Studies, 15(2), 218–234. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2013.809193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson, A. L. (1967). Frames of reference in public health communication. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 8(2), 107–115. doi:10.2307/2948341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohring, M., Marcinkowski, F., Donk, A., Metag, J., & Friedemann, A. (2011). Das bild der nanotechnologie in deutschen printmedien. Eine frameanalytische langzeitstudie [The image of nanotechnology in German print media. A frame analytic longitudinal study]. Publizistik, 56(2), 199–219. doi:10.1007/s11616-011-0117-6
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krupnick, A., Gordon, H., Olmstead, S. (2013). Pathways to dialog: What the experts say about the environmental risks of shale gas development (Resources For the Future Report). Washington, DC: Resources For the Future Report. Retrieved from http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF-Rpt-PathwaystoDialogue_FullReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, C. R. (2014). Fracking frames: A framing analysis and comparative study of hydraulic fracturing coverage in American newspapers (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1397153132.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. T., & Desai, M. H. (2014). Dialogic communication and media relations in non-governmental organizations. Journal of Communication Management, 18(1), 80–100. doi:10.1108/JCOM-07-2012-0059
   Google Scholar
• Lester, L. (2010). Media and environment: Conflict, politics and the news. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, D. K. K., & Lee, F. L. F. (2015). How journalists value positive news. Journalism Studies, 16(2), 289–304. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2013.869062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machill, M. (2008). Journalistische recherche im internet: Bestandsaufnahme journalistischer Arbeitsweisen in Zeitungen, Hörfunk, Fernsehen und Online [Journalistic research on the internet: Inventory journalistic ways of working in newspapers, radio, television and online]. Berlin: Vistas.
   Google Scholar
• Mash, R., Minnaar, J., & Mash, B. (2014). Health and fracking: Should the medical profession be concerned? South African Medical Journal, 104(5), 332–335. doi:10.7196/samj.7860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2007). Framing-Effekte: Zum Einfluss der Politikberichterstattung auf die Einstellungen der Rezipienten [Framing effects: The effect of policy reporting on recipients’ behavior]. München: Reinhard Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2008). Medien-Frames inhaltsanalytisch (be)greifen. Eine Analyse von 135 nationalen und internationalen Fachzeitschriftenaufsätzen, 1990–2005 [Comprehending media frames with content analysis techniques. An analysis of 135 national and international journal articles, 1990–2005]. In J. Matthes, W. Wirth, G. Daschmann, & A. Fahr (Eds.), Die Brücke zwischen Theorie und Empirie: Operationalisierung, Messung und Validierung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft [The bridge between theory and empiricism: Operationalization, measurement and validation of communications] (pp. 157–177). Köln: Herbet von Halem.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. (2014). How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010–2012? Public Understanding of Science, 25(2), 207–222. doi:10.1177/0963662514545311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, L. M., Guo, R., Witter, R. Z., Savitz, D. A., Newman, L. S., & Adgate, J. L. (2014). Birth outcomes and maternal residential proximity to natural gas development in rural Colorado. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(4), 412–417. doi:10.1289/ehp.1306722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiritz, A., & Reimann, A. (2015). Fracking kommt—Hendricks muss damit leben [Fracking is coming—Hendricks has to deal with]. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/fracking-bundesregierung-beschliesst-gesetzentwurf-a-1026606.html
   Google Scholar
• Mercado, M. T., Álvarez, A., & Herranz, J. M. (2014). The fracking debate in the media: The role of citizen platforms as sources of information. ESSACHESS—Journal for Communication Studies, 7(1(13)), 45–62. Retrieved from http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/234/260.
   Google Scholar
• Meyen, M., & Riesmeyer, C. (2009). Diktatur des Publikums: Journalisten in Deutschland [Dictatorship of the audience: Journalists in Germany]. Konstanz: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerium für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Landwirtschaft, Natur- und Verbraucherschutz des Landes Nordhrein-Wetfalen [NRW]. (2012). Fracking in unkonventionellen Erdgas-Lagerstätten in Nordrhein Westfalen: Kurzfassung zum Gutachten [Fracking in unconventional resources in North-Rhine-Westphalia: Summary]. Retrieved from http://www.bezreg-arnsberg.nrw.de/themen/e/erdgasaufsuchung_gewinnung/gutachten_nrw/gutachten_nrw_kurz.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246. doi:10.2307/586517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M., Brossard, D., & Kroepsch, A. (2003). Framing science: The stem cell controversy in the age of press/politics. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(2), 36–70. doi: 10.1177/1081180X02251047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive, A. (2016). What is the fracking story in Canada? Canadian Geographer-Geographie Canadien, 60(1), 32–45. doi:10.1111/cag.12257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paredes, D., Komarek, T., & Loveridge, S. (2015). Income and employment effects of shale gas extraction windfalls: Evidence from the Marcellus region. Energy Economics, 47, 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2014). Little enthusiasm, familiar divisions after the GOP’s big midterm victory. Numbers, facts and trends shaping the world. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/files/2014/11/11-12-14-Post-election-release.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Potthoff, M. (2012). Medien-Frames und ihre Entstehung [Media frames and their appearance]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Ragas, A. M. J., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Henning-de Jong, I., & Leuven, R. S. (2009). Uncertainty in environmental risk assessment: Implications for risk-based management of river basins. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5(1), 27–37. doi:10.1897/IEAM_2008-046.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148–154. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, S., Gandy, O., & Grant, A. (Eds.). (2001). Framing public life. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rögener, W., & Wormer, H. (2015). Defining criteria for good environmental journalism and testing their applicability: An environmental news review as a first step to more evidence based environmental science reporting. Public Understanding of Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0963662515597195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattler, S., & Bigl, B. (2005). In Zukunft werden Journalisten Alleskönner sein [In the future, journalists will be all-rounder]. Retrieved from http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/17983/zdj-ergebnisse.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S., Ivanova, A., & Schmidt, A. (2014). What drives media attention for climate change? Explaining issue attention in Australian, German and Indian print media from 1996 to 2010. International Communication Gazette, 76(2), 152–176. doi:10.1177/1748048513504169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirrmeister, M. (2014). Controversial futures—Discourse analysis on utilizing the “fracking” technology in Germany. European Journal of Futures Research, 2(1), doi:10.1007/s40309-014-0038-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, W. (2003). Mediennutzung und Umweltbewusstsein: Dependenz- und Priming-Effekte [Media usage and environmental awareness: Dependency and priming effects]. Publizistik, 48(4), 387–413. doi:10.1007/s11616-003-0108-3
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, A., & Fritsch, A. (2015). Strategic communication practice of international nongovernmental organization. In D. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 459–480). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1945). The psychology of ‘attitudes’: Part I. Psychological Review, 52(6), 295–319. doi:10.1037/h0062252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. F., & Ferguson, D. P. (2013). “Fracking democracy”: Issues management and locus of policy decision-making in the marcellus shale gas drilling debate. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 377–386. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(3), 264–285. doi:10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K. (2014). Cornucopia or curse? Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 249–264. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staatliche Geologische Dienste Deutschlands [SGD]. (2013). Stellungnahme zu den geowissenschaftlichen Aussagen des UBA - Gutachtens, der Studie NRW und der Risikostudie des ExxonMobil InfoDialogprozesses zum Thema Fracking [Review of the geoscientific statements of the studies UBA, NRW and the risk study fracking]. Retrieved from http://www.infogeo.de/dokumente/download_pool/SN_SGD-Fracking-Studien_V5_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough, J. W., & Vedlitz, A. (2016). The role of scientific knowledge in the public’s perceptions of energy technology risks. Energy Policy, 96, 206–216. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.031 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. H. (2004). Agenda building, source selection, and health news at local television stations. Science Communication, 25(4), 350–363. doi:10.1177/1075547004265127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teräväinen, T. (2014). Representations of energy policy and technology in British and Finnish newspaper media: A comparative perspective. Public Understanding of Science, 23(3), 299–315. doi:10.1177/0963662511409122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torjesen, I. (2013). Fracking poses little risk to public health, but evidence is limited. BMJ. Advance online publication. doi:10.1136/bmj.f6626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2015). Shale in the Unites States. Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/energy_in_brief/article/shale_in_the_united_states.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Umweltbundesamt [UBA]. (2012). Umweltauswirkungen von Fracking bei der Aufsuchung und Gewinnung von Erdgas aus unkonventionellen Lagerstätten: Risikobewertung, Handlungsempfehlungen und Evaluierung bestehender rechtlicher Regelungen und Verwaltungsstrukturen [Environmental impact of fracking in the exploration and production of natural gas from unconventional resources: Risk assessment, recommendations and evaluation of legal provisions and administrative structures]. Retrieved from http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/461/publikationen/4346.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R. (2012). Framing in mass communication research—An overview and assessment. Sociology Compass, 6(12), 937–948. doi:10.1111/soc4.12003
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Chen, X., Jha, A. N., & Rogers, H. (2014). Natural gas from shale formation—The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30(0), 1–28. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, B. A., Geigle, J., & Barkdull, C. (2014). Rural North Dakota’s oil boom and its impact on social services. Social Work, 59(1), 62–72. doi:10.1093/sw/swt068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (2008). Alltagsbilder des Klimawandels. Zum Klimabewusstsein in Deutschland [Everyday images of climate change. About the environmental awareness in Germany]. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weischenberg, S., Malik, M., & Scholl, A. (2006). Die Souffleure der Mediengesellschaft: Report über die Journalisten in Deutschland [The prompters of the media society: Journalists in Germany]. Konstanz: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R., & Curtis, S. (2015, July 13). Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science, 1–17. doi:10.1177/0963662515595159
   Google Scholar
• Wolling, J., & Arlt, D. (Eds.). (2014). Fukushima und die Folgen—Medienberichterstattung, Öffentliche Meinung, Politische Konsequenzen [Fukushima and the consequences—Media coverage, public opinion, political consequences]. Ilmenau: Universitätsverlag Ilmenau.
   Google Scholar
• York, R., & Clark, B. (2010). Nothing new under the sun? The old false promise of new technology. Review, 33(2/3), 203–224. doi:10.2307/23346882
   Google Scholar