Sources and Framing of Fracking: A Content Analysis of Newspaper Coverage in North Carolina, New York, and Pennsylvania

References

• Baumgartner, F. R., De Boef, S. L., & Boydstun, A. E. (2008). The decline of the death penalty and the discovery of innocence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2010). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, B. D., Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., & McCormack, L. (2015). Certainty and uncertainty in framing the risks and benefits of hydraulic fracturing in the Colorado News Media. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 6(3), 290–307. doi: 10.1002/rhc3.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). Counteracting the politicization of science. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 745–769. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T. (2009). We speak for the trees: Media reporting on the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 431–457. doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.051308.084254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of U.S. mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38, 1190–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., & McComas, K. (2004). Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication and Society, 7(3), 359–377. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0703_6
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2012). Environmental communication and the public sphere. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, D. A. (2010). Local media and experts: Sources of environmental policy initiation? Policy Studies Journal, 38(1), 143–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C., & Hoffer, K. (2012). Federalizing energy? Agenda change and the politics of fracking. Policy Sciences, 45, 221–241. doi: 10.1007/s11077-012-9156-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue attention cycle. Public Interest, 28(1), 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Dunwoody, S. (2015). Environmental scientists and public communication. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 63–72). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evensen, D., Jacquet, J. B., Clarke, C. E., & Stedman, R. C. (2014). What’s the “fracking” problem? One word can’t say it all. The Extractive Industries and Society, 1(2), 130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2014.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Freidman, S. M. (2015). The changing face of environmental journalism in the Unites States. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 144–157). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilkeson, F. (2011, July 6). Fracking veto surprises Blake. The Pilot (Southern Pines, NC). Retrieved March 22, 2014, from NewsBank on-line database (America’s News).
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. J., & Dunwoody, S. (1997). Community structure and science framing of news about local environmental risks. Science Communication, 18(4), 362–384. doi: 10.1177/1075547097018004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, D., & Giles, R. (2005). Presses and democracies. In G. Overhoser & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The press (pp. 4–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herald-Sun. (2011, June 7). Fracking decision. The Herald-Sun (Durham, NC). PA6. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from NewsBank on-line database (America’s News).
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, S. (1998). Reading public opinion: How political actors view the democratic process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78. doi: 10.1086/228951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopey, D. (2011, February 27). Jury is out on health, “green” concerns. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (PA) PB2. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from NewsBank on-line database (America’s News).
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1994). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Lemańcyzk, S. (2014). Fracking in the polish press: Geopolitics and national identity. Energy Policy, 74, 253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kester, J., Moyer, R., & Song, G. (2015). Down the line: Assessing the trajectory of energy policy research development. Policy Studies Journal, 43(S1), S40–S55. doi: 10.1111/psj.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W., & Thurber, J. A. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Vol. 45). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S., Park, J., Kim, J., & Go, E. (2013). Exploring the role of agenda-building efforts in media coverage and policymaking activity of healthcare reform. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(4), 652–672. doi: 10.1177/1077699013503157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, S. J. (2013). Legislation by Agenda-setting: Assessing the media’s role in the regulation of bisphenol A in the U.S. states. Mass Communication and Society, 16(5), 687–712. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2013.768345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81. doi: 10.1080/17524030903529749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, L. (2010). Media and environment: Conflict, politics and the news. Cambridge: Polity. Chapter 2: Conflict and Risk; Chapter 4: Sources and Voices.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, M., & Yates, J. C. (2010, June 5). Gas blowout could test state regulators: State authorities promise a full investigation of an incident that shot explosive gas and polluted water into the air. The Patriot-News (Harrisburg, PA). Retrieved March 22, 2014, from NewsBank on-line database (America’s News).
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, S. (2013). Barriers to the influence of evidence on policy: Are politicians the problem? Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 20(3), 225–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, T. M. (2001). Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy Jr, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 83–94). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matz, J., & Renfrew, D. (2015). Selling “fracking”: Energy in depth and the marcellus shale. Environmental Communication, 9(3), 288–306. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.929157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maykuth, A. (2012, April 7). EPA: Tests show water is safe to drink. Philadelphia Inquirer (PA). PA7. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from NewsBank on-line database (America’s News).
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. (2016). How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010–2012? Public Understanding of Science, 25(2), 207–222. doi: 10.1177/0963662514545311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski, J. (2012, June 14). Fracking bill moving fast to approval. P3B. The News & Observer (Raleigh, NC). Retrieved March 22, 2014, from NewsBank on-line database (America’s News).
   Google Scholar
• Murawski, J. (2013, January 30). Fracking might get fast tracked: Some lawmakers want a faster timeline for rules. P1B. The News & Observer (Raleigh, NC). Retrieved March 22, 2014, from NewsBank on-line database (America’s News).
   Google Scholar
• Murawski, J. (2015, May 24). Fracking off the slow start in NC as wildcatters stumble. Raleigh News and Observer. Retrieved August 30, 2015, from http://www.newsobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article21734544.html
   Google Scholar
• Natt, T. (2012, June 17). Fracking in NC comes down to Perdue decisions. The Pilot (Southern Pines, NC). Retrieved March 22, 2014, from NewsBank on-line database (America’s News).
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. (2010). Knowledge into action: Framing the debates over climate change and poverty. In P. A. D’Angelo (Ed.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 43–83). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Huge, M. (2006). Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: Managing power and participation through the Press/Policy connection. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(2), 3–40. doi: 10.1177/1081180X06286701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Newman, T. P. (2015). Framing, the media, and environmental communication. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 325–338). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, A. J. (2006). Citizen speak. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, I., Heinrichs, H., & Peters, H. P. (2010). Mass-mediated expertise as informal policy advice. Science, Technology and Human Values, 35(6), 865–887. doi: 10.1177/0162243909357914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pralle, S., & Boscarino, J. (2011). Framing trade-offs: The politics of nuclear power and wind energy in the age of global climate change. Review of Policy Research, 28(4), 323–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Reimold, D. (2007). Papers lead TV in covering complex environmental issues. Newspaper Research Journal, 28(4), 77.
   Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., & Reimold, D. (2008). Newspapers get high marks on environmental report card. Newspaper Research Journal, 29(3), 65.
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5), 385–403. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of communication, 57(1), 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (2011). The sociology of news, second edition. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, F., Ahern, L., & Baker, M. (2014). Stories that count influence of news narratives on issue attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(1), 98–117. doi: 10.1177/1077699013514414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. F., & Ferguson, D. P. (2013). “Fracking democracy”: Issue management and locus of policy decision-making in the Marcellus Shale gas drilling debate. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 377–386. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneegas, G. (2015). Media representations of hydraulic fracturing and agriculture: A New York case study. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(2016), 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York, NY: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. E., Lee, J. S., & Davie, W. R. (2000). Local press coverage of environmental conflict. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 175–192. doi: 10.1177/107769900007700113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Energy Information Administration. (2011). Review of emerging resources: U.S. shale gas and shale oil plays. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. (2015). Environmental news journalism, public relations, and news sources. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), Routledge handbook of environmental communication (pp. 197–205). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R., & Curtis, S. (2015). Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science. doi:10.1177/0963662515595159
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. (2012). Putting on the brakes or pressing on the gas? Media attention and the speed of policymaking. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 109–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00436.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, 30(2), 175–192. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.737419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozniak, A., Lück, J., & Wessler, H. (2015). Frames, stories, and images: The advantages of a multimodal approach in comparative media content research on climate change. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 469–490. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.981559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar