Metaphors for the War (or Race) against Climate Change

References

• Atanasova, D., & Koteyko, N. (2015a). Metaphors in guardian online and mail online opinion-page content on climate change: War, religion, and politics. Environmental Communication. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705
   Google Scholar
• Atanasova, D., & Koteyko, N. (2015b, April 15). War and religion: The metaphors hampering climate change debate. Retrieved from https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn27358-war-and-religion-the-metaphors-hampering-climate-change-debate/
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T. (2013). Climate change politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 421–448. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-062011-154926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., & McGrath, L. F. (2016). Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nature Climate Change. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M. D., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., Steen, G. J., & Iepsma, M. A. (2015). Making ads less complex, yet more creative and persuasive: The effects of conventional metaphors and irony in print advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 515–532. doi: 10.1080/02650487.2014.996200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics, 2(4), 1–9. doi: 10.1177/2053168015622072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., … Rice, K. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 048002. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, W. N. (1995). Declaring war on the home front: Metaphor, presidents, and the war on drugs. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(2), 93–114. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms1002_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24(1), 56–62. doi: 10.1177/0956797612449177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godoy, E. S., & Jaffe, A. (2016, October 31). We don’t need a ‘war’ on climate change, we need a revolution. The New York Times. Retrieved November 3, 2016, from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/31/opinion/we-dont-need-a-war-on-climate-change-we-need-a-revolution.html?_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science, 21(1), 86–92. doi: 10.1177/0956797609355572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2015). The war on prevention: Bellicose cancer metaphors hurt (some) prevention intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 66–77. doi: 10.1177/0146167214557006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation the case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 48–71. doi: 10.1177/0013916505277998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, D. C. (2012). Statistical methods for psychology (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N., Clark, J., & Tripidaki, G. (2012). Social risk assessment and social capital: A significant parameter for the formation of climate change policies. The Social Science Journal, 49(1), 33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2011.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlberg, M., & Buell, L. (2005). Deconstructing the ‘war of all against all’: The prevalence and implications of war metaphors and other adversarial news schema in TIME, Newsweek, and Maclean’s. Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 12(1), 22–39.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (2002). Making sense of life: Explaining biological developments with models, metaphors, and machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: A cognitive scientist's guide to your brain and its politics. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4, 70–81. doi: 10.1080/17524030903529749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, B. (2011). Metaphors for environmental sustainability: Redefining our relationship with nature. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2016). Climate change in the American mind: March, 2016. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N., & Dawson, E. (2013). Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 818–837. doi: 10.1177/0002764212458272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing—therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24(5), 622–633. doi: 10.1177/0956797612457686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2014). How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: Plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? Climatic Change, 126(1–2), 255–262. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1190-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. F., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 619–642). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marghetis, T., & Núñez, R. (2013). The motion behind the symbols: A vital role for dynamism in the conceptualization of limits and continuity in expert mathematics. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5, 299–316. doi: 10.1111/tops.12013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlock, T. (2012). Framing political messages with grammar and metaphor. American Scientist, 100, 478–483. doi: 10.1511/2012.99.478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlock, T., Gann, T., Bergmann, T., & Coe, C. (2015). Metaphor in communicating wildfire risk. Paper presented at the 2015 Conference on Communication and Environment, Boulder, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis ( Vol. 106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. (2010). Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51, 12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurin, T. (2016, August 31). In race against climate change, innovations to this ingredient could determine the future of brewing. Forbes. Retrieved November 3, 2016, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/taranurin/2016/08/31/in-race-against-climate-change-innovations-to-this-ingredient-could-determine-the-future-of-brewing/#733b53417810
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379. doi: 10.1177/1075547008329201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the turk understanding mechanical turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. doi: 10.1177/0963721414531598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2008). Public attitudes toward the war in Iraq: 2003–2008. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/2008/03/19/public-attitudes-toward-the-war-in-iraq-20032008/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2014). America’s new drug policy landscape: Two-thirds favor treatment, not jail, for use of heroin, cocaine. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2014/04/02/americas-new-drug-policy-landscape/
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160–164. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, T. (2010). Speaking of sustainability: The potential of metaphor. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 6(2), 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Pulaczewska, H. (1999). Aspects of metaphor in physics: Examples and case studies. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. M., Singh, G. G., Benessaiah, K., Bernhardt, J. R., Levine, J., Nelson, H., … Chan, K. M. A. (2013). Ecosystem services and beyond: Using multiple metaphors to understand human–environment relationships. BioScience, 63(7), 536–546. doi: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, L. (2014a). A steady 57% in U.S. blame humans for global warming. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/167972/steady-blame-humans-global-warming.aspx?g_source=CATEGORY_CLIMATE_CHANGE&g_medium=topic&g_campaign=tiles
   Google Scholar
• Saad, L. (2014b). One in four in U.S. are solidly skeptical of global warming. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/168620/one-four-solidly- skeptical-global-warming.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Saad, L. (2015). U.S. views on climate change stable after extreme winter. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/182150/views-climate- change-stable-extreme-winter.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2013). Personally relevant climate change the role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 60–85. doi: 10.1177/0013916511421196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, C., & Nerlich, B. (2015). Metaphor as a mechanism of global climate change governance: A study of international policies, 1992–2012. Ecological Economics, 109, 34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Peters, E., Finucane, M. L., & MacGregor, D. G. (2005). Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology, 24(4S), S35–S40. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2015). Measuring effects of metaphor in a dynamic opinion landscape. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, P. H., Crow, L., & Flusberg, S. J. (2016). The metaphor police: A case study of the role of metaphor in explanation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1192-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, P. H., Frantz, C. M., & Stroink, M. L. (2016). Situating a measure of systems thinking in a landscape of psychological constructs. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. doi: 10.1002/sres.2388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, K. (1989). Chemical metaphors. Journal of Chemistry Education, 66, 1020. doi: 10.1021/ed066p1020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, B., Marghetis, T., & Matlock, T. (2015). Of magnitudes and metaphors: Explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number. Cortex, 64, 209–224. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar