The Anti-Fracking Movement in Ireland: Perspectives from the Media and Activists

References

• Armstrong, E. A., & Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 74–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00319.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, E., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIO Intelligence Service. (2013). Analysis and presentation of the results of the public consultation “Unconventional fossil fuels (e.g. shale gas) in Europe”. Final report prepared for European Commission DG Environment. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/energy/pdf/Shale%20gas%20consultation_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E. (2013). The comparative politics of fracking: Networks and framing in the US and Europe. APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper; American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2301196
   Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E. (2017). Shale we drill? Discourse dynamics in UK fracking debates. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19, 72–88. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1053111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudet, H., Clarke, C., Bugden, D., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy, 65, 57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, J. (2006). Framing dissent: Mass-media coverage of the global justice movement. New Political Science, 28(2), 201–228. doi: 10.1080/07393140600679967
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, J. (2007). Limiting dissent: The mechanisms of state repression in the USA. Social Movement Studies, 6(3), 281–310. doi: 10.1080/14742830701666988
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, J. (2013). The suppression of dissent: How the state and mass media squelch US American social movements. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M., Scheufele, D., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D., Clark, W., Alcock, F., Dickson, N., Eckley, N., & Jäger, J. (2002). Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: Linking research, assessment and decision making. KSG Working Paper Series RWP02-046. doi:10.2139.ssrn.372280
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C., Evensen, D., Jacquet, J., & Stedman, R. (2012). Emerging risk communication challenges associated with shale gas development. The European Journal of Risk Regulation, 3, 424–430. doi: 10.1017/S1867299X00002348
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, R., & Ross, M. (1997). Denying agenda access: Strategic considerations. In R. W. Cobb & M. H. Ross (Eds.), Cultural strategies of agenda denial (pp. 25–45). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Northern Ireland Environment Agency, and Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Public Consultation on proposed terms of reference for a programme of research on environmental impacts of unconventional gas exploration & extraction: What you said and how we’ve responded. Retrieved from http://www.epa.ie/pubs/reports/research/ugeepublicconsultation/ugeeconsultationresponsedocument.html
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Northern Ireland Environment Agency, and Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). UGEE Joint research programme. Retrieved from http://www.epa.ie/pubs/reports/research/ugeejointresearchprogramme/
   Google Scholar
• Drehobl, A. (2014). Should we frack the emerald isle?: The framing of fracking risks in Irish news media (Unpublished master’s thesis). Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? The Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J., & Bolsen, T. (2011). Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. Journal of Communication, 61, 659–688. ISSN 0021-9916 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01562.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economic and Social Research Council. (2012). Fracking and public dialogue. Retrieved from http://www.esrc.ac.uk/news-and-events/features-casestudies/features/20493/Fracking_and_public_dialogue.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, D. T., Clarke, C. E., & Stedman, R. E. (2014). A New York or Pennsylvania state of mind: Social representations in newspaper coverage of gas development in the marcellus shale. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4, 65–77. doi: 10.1007/s13412-013-0153-9
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Kovacheff, C. (2017). Extreme protest tactics reduce popular support for social movements. Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 2911177. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2911177
   Google Scholar
• Finewood, M., & Stroup, L. (2012). Fracking and the neoliberalization of the hydro-social cycle in Pennsylvania’s Marcellus shale. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 147(1), 72–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1936-704X.2012.03104.x
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, C. (2017, June 28). “A great victory”: Onshore fracking is just one step away from being completely banned in Ireland. The Journal. Retrieved from http://www.thejournal.ie/anti-fracking-bill-3468684-Jun2017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fracking Free Ireland. (2016). Archival records. Retrieved from http://frackingfreeireland.org/irish-press-news-2014/irish-press/local-press-ni/
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. (2004, 2007). Bystanders, public opinion and the media. In D.A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements, bystanders, public opinion, and the media (pp. 242–261). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. London: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. (2015). Undone science, industrial innovation, and social movements. In M. Gross, & L. McGoey (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of ignorance studies (pp. 141–154). Oxon: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.davidjhess.org/uploads/3/4/8/1/34811322/handbookignorance.finaldraft.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, A., Keating, D., & Olsen, R. (2016). Unconventional gas exploration and extraction (UGEE) joint research programme: Integrated synthesis report. Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Northern Ireland Environment Agency, and Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from http://www.epa.ie/pubs/reports/research/ugeejointresearchprogramme/EPA%20-%20UGEE%20Integrated%20Synthesis_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Lemańcyzk, S. (2014). Fracking in the Polish press: Geopolitics and national identity. Energy Policy, 74, 253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspal, R., Turner, A., & Nerlich, B. (2014). Fracking on YouTube: Exploring risks, benefits and human values. Environmental Values, 23(5), 501–527. doi: 10.3197/096327114X13947900181473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Research Centre, European Science and Technology Network. (2014). European Science and Technology Network on unconventional hydrocarbon extraction—launch event. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/event/conference/launch-event-european-science-and-technology-network-unconventional-hydrocarbon-extraction
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2013). Fracking and public relations: Rehearsing the arguments and making the case. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(4), 384–390. doi: 10.1002/pa.1490
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H., Emel, J., Goble, R., … Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8, 177–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kádár, Á. (2014). The effect of anti-fracking movements on European shale gas policies: Poland and France (Unpublished master’s Thesis). Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, G. (1979). External efforts to damage or facilitate social movements: Some patterns, explanations, outcomes, and complications. In M. Zald, & J. McCarthy (Eds.), The dynamics of social movements (pp. 94–125). Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/gtmarx/www/movement.html http://web.mit.edu/gtmarx/www/movement.html
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. (2014). How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010–2012? Public Understanding of Science, 25(2), 207–222. doi: 10.1177/0963662514545311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. doi: 10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara, S., Humphrey, M., Andersson, J., Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Knight, W. (2014). Public perception of shale gas extraction in the UK: Has Balcombe bottomed out?, University of Nottingham. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/131787519/public-perceptions-of-shale-gas-in-the-UK-September-2014-pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, S., Humphrey, M., Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Knight, W. (2013). Public perception of shale gas extraction in the UK: The impact of the Balcombe protests in July–August 2013. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Pornpitakan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press Association. (2013). Protest halts shale gas exploration. The Irish Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.ie/world-news/protest-halts-shale-gas-exploration-29819090.html
   Google Scholar
• Purkhardt, S. C., & Stockdale, J. E. (1993). Multidimensional scaling as a technique for the exploration of a social representation. In G. M. Breakwell & D. Canter (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations (Chapter 13). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D., & Iyengar, S. (2012). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K. Kenski, & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 619–632). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siggins, L. (2002, April 9). Scientific committee approves Corrib gas field. The Irish Times. Retrieved from http://www.irishtimes.com/news/scientific-committee-approves-corrib-gas-field-1.1084381
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D., & Benford, R. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman, R., Willits, F., Brasier, K., Filteau, M., & McLaughlin, D. (2011). Natural gas development: Views of New York and Pennsylvania residents in the marcellus shale region. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Community and Regional Development Institute Research and Policy Brief #39.
   Google Scholar
• Steger, T., & Milicevic, M. (2014). One global movement, many local voices: Discourse(s) of the global anti-fracking movement. In L. Leonard & S. Buryn Kedzior (Eds.), Occupy the Earth: Global environmental movements (advances in sustainability and environmental justice, volume 15) (Chapter 1, pp. 1–35). Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, E., & Louis, W. (2014). When will collective action be effective? Violent and non-violent protests differentially influence perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy among sympathizers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 263–276. doi:10.1177/0146167213510525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. (2014). Framing fracking: Public responses to potential unconventional fossil fuel exploitation in the north of England (Durham theses). Durham University.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R., & Curtis, S. (2015). Framing “fracking”: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science, 26(1), 89–104. doi: 10.1177/0963662515595159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar