852
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Frequent but Accurate: A Closer Look at Uncertainty and Opinion Divergence in Climate Change Print News

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 301-321 | Received 18 Jun 2017, Accepted 11 Jan 2018, Published online: 05 Feb 2018

References

  • Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 338–352. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003
  • Bailey, A., Giangola, L., & Boykoff, M. T. (2014). How grammatical choice shapes media representations of climate (un) certainty. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 197–215. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.906481
  • Bennett, W. L. (1996). An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics. Political Communication, 13(4), 373–384. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1996.9963126
  • Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
  • Billett, S. (2010). Dividing climate change: Global warming in the Indian mass media. Climatic Change, 99(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9605-3
  • Boykoff, M. T. (2007). From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(4), 477–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00270.x
  • Boykoff, M. T. (2008). Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995–2004. Climatic Change, 86(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10584-007-9299-3
  • Boykoff, M. T. (2013). Public enemy no. 1? Understanding media representations of outlier views on climate change. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 796–817. doi: 10.1177/0002764213476846
  • Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
  • Boykoff, M. T., & Yulsman, T. (2013). Political economy, media, and climate change: Sinews of modern life. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(5), 359–371.
  • Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., & McComas, K. (2004). Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication & Society, 7(3), 359–377. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0703_6
  • Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
  • Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26(2), 129–151. doi: 10.1177/1075547004270234
  • Dispensa, J. M., & Brulle, R. J. (2003). Media’s social construction of environmental issues: Focus on global warming-a comparative study. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(10), 74–105. doi: 10.1108/01443330310790327
  • Dixon, G., & Clarke, C. (2012). The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism–vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Education Research, 28(2), 352–359. doi: 10.1093/her/cys110
  • Dunlap, R. E. (2013). Climate change skepticism and denial: An introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 691–698. doi: 10.1177/0002764213477097
  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  • Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (1999). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. doi: 10.1080/19312450709336664
  • Hiles, S. S., & Hinnant, A. (2014). Climate change in the newsroom: Journalists’ evolving standards of objectivity when covering global warming. Science Communication, 36(4), 428–453. doi: 10.1177/1075547014534077
  • Hine, D. W., & Gifford, R. (1996). Individual restraint and group efficiency in commons dilemmas: The effects of two types of environmental uncertainty1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(11), 993–1009. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01121.x
  • Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis – Working Group I contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (vol. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349–385. doi: 10.1080/09644010802055576
  • Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 263–291. doi: 10.2307/1914185
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
  • Kuha, M. (2009). Uncertainty about causes and effects of global warming in US news coverage before and after bali. Language & Ecology, 2(4), 1–18.
  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
  • Liu, X., Vedlitz, A., & Alston, L. (2008). Regional news portrayals of global warming and climate change. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(5), 379–393. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.01.002
  • Matthes, J. (2009). What’s in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals, 1990–2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349–367. doi: 10.1177/107769900908600206
  • McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research, 26(1), 30–57. doi: 10.1177/009365099026001003
  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on US climate change policy. Social Problems, 50(3), 348–373. doi: 10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348
  • Nisbet, M. C. (2009a). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23.
  • Nisbet, M. C. (2009b). Framing science: A new paradigm in public engagement. In L. Kahlor & P. Stout (Eds.), Communicating science: New agendas in science communication (pp. 40–67). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming—global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 421–436. doi: 10.1177/0963662507081242
  • O’Neill, S. J., & Boykoff, M. (2010). Climate denier, skeptic, or contrarian? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(39), E151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010507107
  • O’Neill, S. J., Williams, H. T., Kurz, T., Wiersma, B., & Boykoff, M. (2015). Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC fifth assessment report. Nature Climate Change, 5(4), 380–385. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2535
  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. K. (2010). Merchants of doubt. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
  • Painter, J., & Ashe, T. (2012). Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate skepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007–10. Environmental Research Letters, 7(4), 044005. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044005
  • Perreault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 135–148. doi: 10.2307/3172601
  • Pew Research Center. (2015). Major gaps between the public, scientists on key issues. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/interactives/public-scientists-opinion-gap/
  • Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1015–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001
  • Rahmstorf, S. (2005). The climate sceptics. In Weather catastrophes and climate change: Is there still hope for us? (pp. 76–83). Munich: Munich Reinsurance Company.
  • Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Fein, G., Rosenthal, S., & Kreslake, J. (2014). Global warming’s Six Americas: Perceptions of the health consequences of global warming and update on key beliefs. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
  • Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2014). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication theories (pp. 1–28). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224818492_The_state_of_framing_research_A_call_for_new_directions doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.47
  • Schuck, A. R., & De Vreese, C. H. (2006). Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 21(1), 5–32. doi: 10.1177/0267323106060987
  • Sharman, A. (2014). Mapping the climate sceptical blogosphere. Global Environmental Change, 26(May), 159–270. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.003
  • Shehata, A., & Hopmann, D. N. (2012). Framing climate change: A study of US and Swedish press coverage of global warming. Journalism Studies, 13(2), 175–192. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2011.646396
  • Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
  • Takahashi, B., Huang, K., Fico, F., & Poulson, D. (2017). Climate change reporting in Great Lakes region newspapers: A comparative study of the use of expert sources. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 106–121. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1220967
  • Takahashi, B., & Meisner, M. (2013). Climate change in Peruvian newspapers: The role of foreign voices in a context of vulnerability. Public Understanding of Science, 22(4), 427–442. doi: 10.1177/0963662511431204
  • Trumbo, C. (1996). Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understanding of Science, 5(3), 269–283. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/5/3/006
  • Zamith, R., Pinto, J., & Villar, M. E. (2013). Constructing climate change in the Americas: An analysis of news coverage in US and South American newspapers. Science Communication, 35(3), 334–357. doi: 10.1177/1075547012457470
  • Zehr, S. C. (2000). Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 9(2), 85–103. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/301
  • Zhao, X., Rolfe-Redding, J., & Kotcher, J. E. (2016). Partisan differences in the relationship between newspaper coverage and concern over global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 25(5), 543–559. doi: 10.1177/0963662514558992

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.