577
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Co-Creating Green Transition: How Municipality Employees Negotiate their Professional Identities as Agents of Citizen Involvement in a Cross-Local Setting

Pages 701-714 | Received 19 Jul 2017, Accepted 24 Jan 2018, Published online: 26 Feb 2018

References

  • Agger, A., & Tortzen, A. (2015). Forskningsreview om samskabelse. Vejle: University College Lillebælt.
  • Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., & Iedema, R. (Eds.). (2008). Identity trouble. Critical discourse and contested identities. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Carvalho, A., Pinto-Coelho, Z., & Seixas, E. (2016). Listening to the public – Enacting power: Citizen access, standing and influence in public participation discourses. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1149772
  • Delgado, A., Kjølberg, K. L., & Wickson, F. (2011). Public engagement coming of Age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 20(6), 826–845. doi: 10.1177/0963662510363054
  • Doyle, J. (2011). Mediating climate change. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. London: Longman.
  • Felt, U., & Fochler, M. (2010). Machineries for making publics: Inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement. Minerva, 48, 219–238. doi: 10.1007/s11024-010-9155-x
  • Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung [Between facts and norms]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
  • Hajer, M. A. (2009). Authoritative governance. Policy-making in the age of mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hausendorf, H., & Bora, A. (Eds.). (2006). Analysing citizenship talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Hoff, J., & Gausset, Q. (Eds.). (2015). Community governance and citizen-driven innovation in climate change mitigation. London: Routledge.
  • Kurath, M., & Gisler, P. (2009). Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 559–573. doi: 10.1177/0963662509104723
  • Lassen, I., & Horsbøl, A. (2016). Governing citizen engagement. A discourse studies perspective. In P. McIlvenny, J. Zhukova Klausen, & L. Bang Lindegaard (Eds.), Studies of discourse and governmentality (pp. 73–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Lassen, I., Horsbøl, A., Bonnen, K., & Pedersen, A. G. J. (2011). Climate change discourses and citizen participation: A case study of the discursive construction of citizenship in Two public events. Environmental Communication, 5(4), 411–427. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2011.610809
  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290. doi: 10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03
  • Linell, P., & Sarangi, S. (Eds.). (1998). Discourse across professional boundaries. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Nygren, G., & Stigbrand, K. (2014). The formation of a professional identity. Journalism Studies, 15(6), 841–858. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2013.834163
  • Paterson, M., & Stripple, J. (2010). My space: Governing individuals’ Carbon emissions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(2), 341–362. doi: 10.1068/d4109
  • Phillips, L. (2011). The promise of dialogue. The dialogic turn in the production and communication of knowledge. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Phillips, L., Carvalho, A., & Doyle, J. (Eds.). (2012). Citizen voices: Performing public participation in science and environment communication. Bristol: Intellect Ltd.
  • Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87–121). London: Sage.
  • Schweizer, S., Davis, S., & Thompson, J. L. (2013). Changing the conversation about climate change: A theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environmental Communication, 7(1), 42–62. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2012.753634
  • Scollon, R. (2008). Analyzing public discourse. Discourse analysis in the making of public policy. London: Routledge.
  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2004). Nexus analysis. Discourse and the emerging internet. New York: Routledge.
  • Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Democratizing global climate governance. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stripple, J., & Bulkeley, H. (2013). Governing the climate. New approaches to rationality, power and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tracy, K. (2010). Challenges of ordinary democracy : A case study in deliberation and dissent. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Van Dijk, T. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012a). Co-production: The state of the Art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas, 23(4), 1083–1101. doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
  • Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (Eds.). (2012b). New public governance, the third sector, and Co-production. London: Routledge.
  • Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of Co-creation and Co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
  • Walters, W. (2012). Governmentality. Critical encounters. London/New York: Routledge.
  • Whitmarsh, L., O'Neill, S., & Lorenzoni, I. (Eds.). (2011). Engaging the public with climate change. Behaviour change and communication. London: Earthscan.
  • Wiles, F. (2013). “Not easily Put into a Box”: constructing professional identity. Social Work Education, 32(7), 854–866. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2012.705273
  • Yam, B. M. C. (2004). From vocation to profession: The quest for professionaiization of nursing. British Journal of Nursing, 13(16), 978–982. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2004.13.16.15974

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.