2,817
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Between Guilt and Obligation: Debating the Responsibility for Climate Change and Climate Politics in the Media

, &
Pages 723-739 | Received 06 Jul 2017, Accepted 22 Feb 2018, Published online: 01 May 2018

References

  • Bernauer, T. (2013). Climate change politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 421–448.
  • Billett, S. (2010). Dividing climate change: Global warming in the Indian mass media. Climatic Change, 99(1), 1–16.
  • Broadbent, J., Sonnett, J., Botetzagias, I., Carson, M., Carvalho, A., Chien, Y. J., Hasegawa, K., et al. (2016). Conflicting climate change frames in a global field of media discourse. Socius, 2, doi:10.1177/2378023116670660.
  • Brunnée, J., & Streck, C. (2013). The UNFCCC as a negotiation forum: Towards common but more differentiated responsibilities. Climate Policy, 13(5), 589–607.
  • Entman, R. M. (1991). Symposium framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–27.
  • Eide, E., & Kunelius, R. (2010). Domesticating global moments. A transnational study on the coverage of the Bali and Copenhagen Climate Summits. In E. Eide, R. Kunelius, & V. Kumpu (Eds.), Global Climate - local journalisms (pp. 11–50). Bochum, Germany: projektverlag.
  • Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Bennett-AbuAyyash, C. (2011). Intergroup competition. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 225–240). London: Sage.
  • Fiske, S. T., & Russell, A. M. (2011). Cognitive processes. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 115–130). London: Sage.
  • Friman, M., & Hjerpe, M. (2015). Agreement, significance, and understandings of historical responsibility in climate change negotiations. Climate Policy, 15(3), 302–320.
  • Füssel, H. M. (2010). How inequitable is the global distribution of responsibility, capability, and vulnerability to climate change: A comprehensive indicator-based assessment. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 597–611.
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Houlette, M. A. (2010). Social categorization. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 526–543). London: Sage.
  • Genovese, F. (2014). States’ interests at international climate negotiations: New measures of bargaining positions. Environmental Politics, 23(4), 610–631.
  • Gerhards, J., Offerhaus, A., & Roose, J. (2009). Wer ist verantwortlich? Die Europäische Union, ihre Nationalstaaten und die massenmediale Attribution von Verantwortung für Erfolge und Misserfolge. In F. Marcinkowski, & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Politik in der Mediendemokratie (pp. 529–558). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Gupta, J. (2010). A history of international climate change policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1, 636–653.
  • Haßler, J. (2016). Mediatisierung der Klimapolitik: Eine vergleichende Input-Output-Analyse zur Übernahme der Medienlogik durch die Politik. Wiesbaden: Springer-Verlag.
  • Hallding, K., Jürisoo, M., Carson, M., & Atteridge, A. (2013). Rising powers: The evolving role of BASIC countries. Climate Policy, 13(5), 608–631.
  • Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Huggel, C., Wallimann-Helmer, I., Stone, D., & Cramer, W. (2016). Reconciling justice and attribution research to advance climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(10), 901–908.
  • Iyengar, S. (1989). How citizens think about national issues: A matter of responsibility. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 878–900.
  • Johannessen, J. (2015). Worldview struggles under a new climate regime. Nordicom Review, 36(1), 35–49.
  • Jones, T. M., & Sheets, P. (2009). Torture in the eye of the beholder: Social identity, news coverage, and Abu Ghraib. Political Communication, 26(3), 278–295.
  • Kepplinger, H. M., & Lemke, R. (2016). Instrumentalizing Fukushima: Comparing media coverage of Fukushima in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. Political Communication, 33(3), 351–373.
  • Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., Post, S., & Schäfer, M. S. (2017). How domestic media (de-)legitimize climate politics. A content analysis of newspaper coverage in five countries. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the German Communication Association March 2017.
  • Leyens, J.-P., & Demoulin, S. (2011). Ethnocentrism and group realities. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 194–208). London: Sage.
  • Liang, X., Tsai, J. Y., Mattis, K., Konieczna, M., & Dunwoody, S. (2014). Exploring attribution of responsibility in a cross-national study of TV news coverage of the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(2), 253–271.
  • Michaelowa, K., & Michaelowa, A. (2012). India as an emerging power in international climate negotiations. Climate Policy, 12(5), 575–590.
  • Müller, P. (2013). National identity building through patterns of an international third-person perception in news coverage. International Communication Gazette, 75(8), 732–749.
  • Müller, P. (2016). National identity building as a mediated process: A two-level model of its functions and dysfunctions. In P. Schmidt, J. Seethaler, L. Huddy, & J. Grimm (Eds.), Dynamics of national identity. Media and societal factors of what we are (pp. 319–333). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming—global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 421–436.
  • Olausson, U. (2010). Towards a European identity? The news media and the case of climate change. European Journal of Communication, 25(2), 138–152.
  • Rivenburgh, N. K. (2000). Social identity theory and new portrayals of citizens involved in international affairs. Media Psychology, 2(4), 303–329.
  • Schäfer, M. S., Ivanova, A., & Schmidt, A. (2014). What drives media attention for climate change? Explaining issue attention in Australian, German and Indian print media from 1996 to 2010. International Communication Gazette, 76(2), 152–176.
  • Scharkow, M. (2012). Automatische Inhaltsanalyse und maschinelles Lernen. epubli.
  • Schmidt, A., Ivanova, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2013). Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1233–1248.
  • Schmidt, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Constructions of climate justice in German, Indian and US media. Climatic Change, 133(3), 535–549.
  • Snider, J. H., & Janda, K. (1998). Newpapers in bytes and bits: Limitations of electronic databases for content analysis. Paper delivered at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September 3–6, 1998.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 2–24). Chicago: Nelson.
  • UN. (1992). The framework convention on climate change (A/AC.237/18 (Part II)/Add.1). New York: UN General Assembly.
  • Wettstein, M. (2014). Angrist 1.2: Documentation and Reference for the Coder Interface. Retrieved from http://www.ipmz.uzh.ch/Abteilungen/Medienpsychologie/Recource/Angrist/ANGRIST_1-2-en.pdf.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.