Users’ Perspectives About the Potential Usefulness of Online Storylines to Communicate River Research to a Multi-disciplinary Audience

References

• Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12), 1683–1707. doi: 10.1080/09500690802380695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks, M., Mills, J., Francis, K., & Chapman, Y. (2009). A thousand words paint a picture: The use of storyline in grounded theory research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(5), 405–417. doi: 10.1177/1744987109104675
   Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å. (2009). Speaking of risk: Matters of context. Environmental Communication, 3(3), 335–354. doi: 10.1080/17524030903230132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugnach, M., & Ingram, H. (2012). Ambiguity: The challenge of knowing and deciding together. Environmental Science & Policy, 15(1), 60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruijn, K. M. de, Lips, N., Gersonius, B., & Middelkoop, H. (2016). The storyline approach: A new way to analyse and improve flood event management. Natural Hazards, 81(1), 99–121. doi: 10.1007/s11069-015-2074-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchecker, M., Salvini, G., Di Baldassarre, G., Semenzin, E., Maidl, E., & Marcomini, A. (2013). The role of risk perception in making flood risk management more effective. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 3013–3030. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-3013-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camporeale, C., De Nicola, A., & Villani, M. L. (2015). Semantics-based services for a low carbon society: An application on emissions trading system data and scenarios management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 64, 124–142. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Charrière, M. K. M., & Bogaard, T. A. (2016). Smartphone applications for communicating avalanche risk information – a study on how they are developed and evaluated by their providers. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16(5), 1175–1188. doi: 10.5194/nhess-16-1175-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, M., Åberg, A., Lidström, S., & Larsen, K. (2018). Environmental themes in popular narratives. Environmental Communication, 12(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1421802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, D. S. (2008). Interactive features of online newspapers: Identifying patterns and predicting use of engaged readers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 658–679. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covi, M. P., & Kain, D. J. (2016). Sea-level rise risk communication: Public understanding, risk perception, and attitudes about information. Environmental Communication, 10(5), 612–633. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1056541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13614–13620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320645111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F., & Ho, S. S. (2012). Ethical considerations of using narrative to communicate science. Science Communication, 34(5), 592–617. doi: 10.1177/1075547012454597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieperink, C., Hegger, D. L. T., Bakker, M. H. N., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Green, C., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2016). Recurrent governance challenges in the implementation and alignment of flood risk management strategies: A review. Water Resources Management, 30(13), 4467–4481. doi: 10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincheva, V., Ernst, J. R., & Raja Boean, N. (2015). Storytelling for sustainability practitioners: supporting the communication for strategic sustainable development. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:839722
   Google Scholar
• Dong, C., Schoups, G., & van de Giesen, N. (2013). Scenario development for water resource planning and management: A review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(4), 749–761. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J., Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Leventon, J., Nshimbi, M., Chama, F., … Syampungani, S. (2014). Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: Experiences in community engagement from Southern Africa. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1990). Introduction to communication studies. In PMI global congress proceedings. Melbourne: Practical PM. Retrieved from www.mosaicprojects.com.au/PDF_Papers/P094_Beyond_Reporting.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fliervoet, J. M., & van den Born, R. J. G. (2017). From implementation towards maintenance: Sustaining collaborative initiatives for integrated floodplain management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 570–590. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2016.1200962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freshwater, D. (2009). A thousand words paint a picture: The use of storyline in grounded theory research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(5), 419–420. doi: 10.1177/1744987109104676
   Google Scholar
• Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. van, Nijland, N., Limburg, M. van, Ossebaard, H. C., Kelders, S. M., Eysenbach, G., & Seydel, E. R. (2011). A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e111. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haasnoot, M., Middelkoop, H., Offermans, A., Beek, E. van, & Deursen, W. P. A. van. (2012). Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment. Climatic Change, 115(3–4), 795–819. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0444-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall Jamieson, K., & Hardy, B. W. (2014). Leveraging scientific credibility about Arctic sea ice trends in a polarized political environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13598–13605.
   Google Scholar
• Herk, S. van, Rijke, J., Zevenbergen, C., Ashley, R., & Besseling, B. (2015). Adaptive co-management and network learning in the room for the river programme. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(3), 554–575. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2013.873364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinyard, L. J., & Kreuter, M. W. (2007). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: A conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 34(5), 777–792. doi: 10.1177/1090198106291963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, D., & Hartson, H. R. (1993). Developing user interfaces: Ensuring usability through product & process. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Höppner, C., Whittle, R., Bründl, M., & Buchecker, M. (2012). Linking social capacities and risk communication in Europe: A gap between theory and practice? Natural Hazards, 64(2), 1753–1778. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0356-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulscher, S. J. M., Schielen, R. M., & Augustijn, D. C. (2016). RiverCare Knowledge Dissemination Days October 31–November 2016. No. 40-2016, Netherlands of River Research NCR. Retrieved from https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/18884847
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, H. (2014). The power of narratives in environmental action: New approaches. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 56(2), 4–5. doi: 10.1080/00139157.2014.881698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, M., Ingram, H., & Lejano, R. (2017). Environmental action in the anthropocene: The power of narrative networks. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(0), 1–16. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1113513
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Analysis, 26(3), 631–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00773.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, A., & Bucy, E. P. (2018). Interpreting images of fracking: How visual frames and standing attitudes shape perceptions of environmental risk and economic benefit. Environmental Communication, 12, 322–343. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2017.1412996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D., … Woolley, S. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 221–235. doi: 10.1080/08836610701357922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, T., Maynard, C., Carr, G., Bruns, A., Mueller, E. N., & Lane, S. (2016). A transdisciplinary account of water research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 3(3), 369–389. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupilas, B. (2017). Effects of river restoration on ecosystem metabolism and trophic relationships (PhD Thesis). Universität Duisburg - Essen, Germany. Retrieved from https://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-43772/DissBKupilas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, C. F. (2014). Working with stories in your community or organization (Third Edition). Kurtz-Fernhout Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.workingwithstories.org/WorkingWithStoriesThirdEdition_Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. C., & Morehouse, B. J. (2005). The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Global Environmental Change, 15(1), 57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenfeld, L. A., Hall, D. M., McGreavy, B., Silka, L., & Hart, D. (2012). Creating a place for environmental communication research in sustainability science. Environmental Communication, 6(1), 23–43. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2011.640702
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. (2015). Why are people skeptical about climate change? Some insights from blog comments. Environmental Communication, 9, 153–168. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.999694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurel, P., Craps, M., Cernesson, F., Raymond, R., Valkering, P., & Ferrand, N. (2007). Concepts and methods for analysing the role of information and communication tools (IC-tools) in social learning processes for river basin management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(5), 630–639. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeth, M. K., Lybecker, D. L., Stoutenborough, J. W., Davis, S. N., & Running, K. (2017). Content matters: Stakeholder assessment of river stories or river science. Public Policy and Administration. doi: 10.1177/0952076716671034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeth, Mark K., Lybecker, D. L., & Stoutenborough, J. W. (2016). Do stakeholders analyze their audience? The communication switch and stakeholder personal versus public communication choices. Policy Sciences, 49(4), 421–444. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9252-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, B. S., Ascough II, J. C., Twery, M., Chew, J., Elmahdi, A., Haase, D., … Voinov, A. (2011). Environmental decision support systems (EDSS) development–challenges and best practices. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(12), 1389–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moezzi, M., Janda, K. B., & Rotmann, S. (2017). Using stories, narratives, and storytelling in energy and climate change research. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 31–53. doi: 10.1002/wcc.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, M., & Sools, A. (2015). Chapter 9. Narrative research. In Qualitative research in clinical and health psychology (P. Rohleder & A. Lyons, pp. 133–154). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Fahy, D. (2015). The need for knowledge-based journalism in politicized science debates. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 223–234. doi: 10.1177/0002716214559887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ny, H., MacDonald, J. P., Broman, G., Yamamoto, R., & Robért, K.-H. (2006). Sustainability constraints as system boundaries: An approach to making life-cycle management strategic. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1–2), 61–77. doi: 10.1162/108819806775545349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2008). Requirements for adaptive water management. In C. Pahl-Wostl, P. Kabat, & J. Möltgen (Eds.), Adaptive and integrated water management (pp. 1–22). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-75941-6_1
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. (2012). Storytelling in earth sciences: The eight basic plots. Earth-Science Reviews, 115(3), 153–162. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt Miles, J. D. (2013). Designing collaborative processes for adaptive management: Four structures for multistakeholder collaboration. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 5. doi: 10.5751/ES-05709-180405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REFORM. (2015). REFORM Newsletter No 6 - March, 2015. PhD research in REFORM - Effects of river restoration on ecosystem functions: Integrating functional aspects into river management. REFORM. [European Union’s Seventh program website]. Retrieved July 17, 2018, from https://reformrivers.eu/news/295
   Google Scholar
• Rohrmann, B. (1992). The evaluation of risk communication effectiveness. Acta Psychologica, 81(2), 169–192. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(92)90004-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholtz, J. (2004). National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved from http://notification.etisalat.com.eg/etisalat/templates/582/Usability%2520Evaluation_rev1[1].pdf
   Google Scholar
• Segel, E., & Heer, J. (2010). Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1139–1148. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Kern, F. (2009). The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy. Environmental Politics, 18(1), 78–98. doi: 10.1080/09644010802624835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, S. H., DeLorme, D. E., & Hagen, S. C. (2014). An analysis of the narrative-building features of interactive sea level rise viewers. Science Communication, 36(6), 675–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Bijl-Brouwer, M., & van der Voort, M. (2014). Understanding design for dynamic and diverse use situations. International Journal of Design, 8(2), 29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbrugge, L. N. H., Ganzevoort, W., Fliervoet, J. M., Panten, K., & van den Born, R. J. G. (2017). Implementing participatory monitoring in river management: The role of stakeholders’ perspectives and incentives. Journal of Environmental Management. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J. F., & Buuren, A. van. (2011). Implementing room for the river: Narratives of success and failure in Kampen, the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(4), 779–801. doi: 10.1177/0020852311419387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 103–120. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V. (2009). Communicating uncertainty: Models of communication and the role of science in assessing progress towards environmental objectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11(2), 87–102. doi: 10.1080/15239080902891285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozniak, A., Lück, J., & Wessler, H. (2015). Frames, stories, and images: The advantages of a multimodal approach in comparative media content research on climate change. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 469–490. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.981559
   Google Scholar
• Zulkafli, Z., Perez, K., Vitolo, C., Buytaert, W., Karpouzoglou, T., Dewulf, A., … Shaheed, S. (2017). User-driven design of decision support systems for polycentric environmental resources management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 88, 58–73. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar