Protective Progressives to Distrustful Traditionalists: A Post Hoc Segmentation Method for Science Communication

References

• Altemeyer, R. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2011). The role of media and deference to scientific authority in cultivating trust in sources of information about emerging technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edr032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. O. (2012). Public perceptions of incompatibiility between “science and religion”. Public Understanding of Science, 21(3), 340–353. doi: 10.1177/0963662511434908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C. (2018). Audiences for science communication in the United States. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1005–1022. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1457067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blashfield, R. K. (1976). Mixture model tests of cluster analysis: Accuracy of four agglomerative hierarchical methods. Psychological Bulletin, 83(3), 377–388. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.3.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S. (2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science, 316(5827), 996–997. doi: 10.1126/science.1133398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brashers, D. E., Goldsmith, D. J., & Hsieh, E. (2002). Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 258–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00807.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossard, D., & Nisbet, M. C. (2007). Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding US opinion on agricultural biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 24–52. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edl003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Kim, E., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2008). Religiosity as a perceptual filter: Examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 546–558. doi: 10.1177/0963662507087304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M., Anderson, A. A., Choi, D.-H., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Liang, X., … Dudo, A. (2012). Coverage of emerging technologies: A comparison between print and online media. New Media & Society, 14(6), 1039–1059. doi: 10.1177/1461444812439061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füchslin, T., Schäfer, M., & Metag, J. (2018). A short survey instrument to segment populations according to their attitudes toward science. Scale development, optimization and assessment. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1095–1108. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1461673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187. doi: 10.1177/0003122412438225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, L., & Weingart, P. (2018). Promises and reservations toward science and technology among South African publics: A culture-sensitive approach. Public Understanding of Science, 27(1), 47–58. doi: 10.1177/0963662517693453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J. (2009). Review article: Putting polarization in perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 413–448. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, D. W., Reser, J. P., Morrison, M., Phillips, W. J., Nunn, P., & Cooksey, R. (2014). Audience segmentation and climate change communication: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(4), 441–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2008). Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(2), 171–192. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edn017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovick, S. R., Liang, M.-C., & Kahlor, L. (2014). Predicting cancer risk knowledge and information seeking: The role of social and cognitive factors. Health Communication, 29(7), 656–668. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.763204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelen, T. G., & Lockett, L. A. (2014). Religion, partisanship, and attitudes toward science policy. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1177/2158244013518932
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, S., Nakayama, M., & Saijo, M. (2011). A survey of scientific literacy to provide a foundation for designing science communication in Japan. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6), 674–690. doi: 10.1177/0963662511418893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2013). Marketing management, 15th global edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-J., & Scheufele, D. A. (2006). The influence of knowledge and deference toward scientific authority: A media effects model for public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 819–834. doi: 10.1177/107769900608300406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, X., Ho, S. S., Brossard, D., Xenos, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., Anderson, A. A., … He, X. (2015). Value predispositions as perceptual filters: Comparing of public attitudes toward nanotechnology in the United States and Singapore. Public Understanding of Science, 24(5), 582–600. doi: 10.1177/0963662513510858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Mertz, C. (2011). Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PloS one, 6(3), e17571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., & Dunbar, I. (2012). Market segmentation: How to do it and how to profit from it. West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Metag, J., Füchslin, T., & Schäfer, M. S. (2017). Global warming’s five Germanys: A typology of Germans’ views on climate change and patterns of media use and information. Public Understanding of Science, 26(4), 434–451. doi: 10.1177/0963662515592558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, G. W., & Cheng, R. (1996). Measuring the influence of individual data points in a cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 13(2), 315–335. doi: 10.1007/BF01246105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, T. L., & Noy, S. (2015). Traditional, modern and post-secular perspectives on science and religion in the United States. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 82–115. doi: 10.1177/0003122414558919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015). Americans, politics and science issues. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/07/01/americans-politics-and-science-issues/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2017). 2017 Science news and information questionnaire. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2017/09/20102531/PJ_2017.09.20_Science-and-News_TOPLINE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S., Füchslin, T., Metag, J., Kristiansen, S., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2018). The different audiences of science communication: A segmentation analysis of the Swiss population’s perceptions of science and their information and media use patterns. Public Understanding of Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0963662517752886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Brossard, D. (2008). Nanotechnology as a moral issue? Religion and science in the US. AAAS Professional Ethics Report, 21(1), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., Corley, E. A., Shih, T.-J., Dalrymple, K. E., & Ho, S. S. (2009). Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nature Nanotechnology, 4(2), 91–94. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., & Whitney, R. E. (1973). Political persuasion. In I. De Sola Pool (Ed.), Handbook of communication (pp. 253–289). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Su, L. Y.-F., Akin, H., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2015). Science news consumption patterns and their implications for public understanding of science. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(3), 597–616. doi: 10.1177/1077699015586415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K., & Geiger, N. (2017). From alarmed to dismissive of climate change: A single item assessment of individual differences in concern and issue involvement. Environmental Communication, 11(4), 568–586. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2017.1308409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. M., Rimal, R. N., Morrison, D., & Kim, H. (2006). The role of anxiety in seeking and retaining risk information: Testing the risk perception attitude framework in two studies. Human Communication Research, 32(2), 130–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00006.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 235–244. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A. (2000). Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, S. K., Xenos, M. A., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2015). Selecting our own science: How communication contexts and individual traits shape information seeking. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 172–191. doi: 10.1177/0002716214557782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar