Audience Segments in Environmental and Science Communication: Recent Findings and Future Perspectives

References

• Ashworth, P., Jeanneret, T., Gardner, J., & Shaw, H. (2011). Communication and climate change: What the Australian public thinks ( Report No. EP112769). Canberra: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J., & Szuster, B. (2018). Beyond unidimensionality: Segmenting contemporary pro-environmental worldviews through surveys and repertory grid analysis. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1062–1076. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1504809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C. (2013). The state of public opinion research on attitudes and understanding of science and technology. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33(1-2), 12–20. doi: 10.1177/0270467613496723
   Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C. (2018). Audiences for science communication in the United States. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1005–1022. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1457067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfadelli, H. (2017). Communications about biotechnologies and GMOs across Europe. In K. H. Jamieson, D. M. Kahan, & D. Scheufele (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on the science of science communication (pp. 157–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brossard, D. (2013). New media landscapes and the science information consumer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Supplement 3), 14096–14101. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212744110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chryst, B., Marlon, J., van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., & Roser-Renouf, C. (2018). Global warming’s “Six Americas Short Survey”: Audience segmentation of climate change views using a four question instrument. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1109–1122. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1508047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Councils UK, R. (2008). Public attitudes to science 2008: A survey. London: Department of Innovation. Universities & Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Detenber, B., Rosenthal, S., Liao, Y., & Ho, S. S. (2016). Audience segmentation for campaign design: Addressing climate change in Singapore. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4736–4758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibb, S., & Simkin, L. (2009). Bridging the segmentation theory/practice divide. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(3), 219–225. doi: 10.1362/026725709X429728
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer. (2017). Eurobarometer 468 - attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. Brussels: European Union. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_416_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2014). The science of science communication II. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13583–13584. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414635111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füchslin, T., Schäfer, M. S., & Metag, J. (2018). A short survey instrument to segment populations according to their attitudes toward science. Scale development, optimization and assessment. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1095–1108. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1461673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, L., & Weingart, P. (2018). Promises and reservations towards science and technology among South African publics: A culture-sensitive approach. Public Understanding of Science, 27(1), 47–58. doi: 10.1177/0963662517693453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, L., Weingart, P., & Meyer, C. (2018). “Science is everywhere, but no one knows It”: Assessing the cultural distance to science of rural South African publics. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1046–1061. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1455724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefner, D. (2013). „Wie kriegen wir sie ins Boot?“ – Eine Typologie zur Entwicklung von Kommunikationsstrategien zur Förderung umweltschützenden Verhaltens [„How do we bring them in? [A typology of relevant characteristics and communication habits for developing communication strategies promoting environmentally sustainable behaviour]. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 61(3), 387–405. doi: 10.5771/1615-634x-2013-3-387
   Google Scholar
• Hine, D. W., Reser, J. P., Morrison, M., Phillips, W. J., Nunn, P., & Cooksey, R. (2014). Audience segmentation and climate change communication: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(4), 441–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, T., & Doron, N. (2011). Climate change and sustainable consumption: What do the public think is fair. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, S., Nakayama, M., & Saijo, M. (2013). A survey of scientific literacy to provide a foundation for designing science communication in Japan. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6), 674–690. doi: 10.1177/0963662511418893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, S., Bonfadelli, H., & Kovic, M. (2016). Risk perception of nuclear energy after Fukushima: Stability and change in public opinion in Switzerland. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(1), 24–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Howe, P. (2013). Global warming’s six Americas, September 2012. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Smith, N. (2010). Global warming’s six Americas. New Haven, CT: Yale University and George Mason University.
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., Thaker, J., Feinberg, G., & Cooper, D. (2013). Global warming’s six Indias. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., & Hulme, M. (2009). Believing is seeing: Laypeople's views of future socio-economic and climate change in England and in Italy. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 383–400. doi: 10.1177/0963662508089540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotenberg, L. D., Schechter, C., & Strand, J. (2011). Segmentation and targeting. In G. Hastings, K. Angus, & C. Bryant (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social marketing (pp. 125–135). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Mertz, C. K. (2011). Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PloS one, 6(3), e17571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2009). Global warming's six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation analysis. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Maibach, E. W., Weber, D., Massett, H., Hancock, G. R., & Price, S. (2006). Understanding consumers’ health information preferences development and validation of a brief screening instrument. Journal of Health Communication, 11(8), 717–736. doi: 10.1080/10810730600934633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metag, J., Füchslin, T., & Schäfer, M. S. (2017). Global warming’s five Germanys: A typology of Germans’ views on climate change and patterns of media use and information. Public Understanding of Science, 26(4), 434–451. doi: 10.1177/0963662515592558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metag, J., Maier, M., Füchslin, T., Bromme, L., & Schäfer, M. S. (2018). Between active seekers and non-users: Segments of science-related media usage in Switzerland and Germany. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1077–1094. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1463924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, M., Duncan, R., Sherley, C., & Parton, K. (2013). A comparison between attitudes to climate change in Australia and the United States. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 20(2), 87–100. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2012.762946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Myers, T. (2007). The polls trends: Twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(3), 444–470. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfm031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M., & Markowitz, E. M. (2014). Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: Looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society. PLOS One, 9(2), e88473. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. doi: 10.1177/009365002236196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 673–693. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Science and Technology. (2005). Science in society: Findings from qualitative and quantitative research. London: Department of Trade & Industry, Office of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Science and Technology and the Wellcome Trust. (2000). Science and the public: A review of science communication and public attitudes to science in Britain. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Science and Technology and the Wellcome Trust. (2001). Science and the public: A review of science communication and public attitudes toward science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 10(3), 315–330. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/10/3/305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., & Rosenthal, S. (2016). Global warming’s six Americas and the election, 2016. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Runge, K. K., Brossard, D., & Xenos, M. (2018). Protective progressives to distrustful traditionalists: A post hoc segmentation method for science communication. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1023–1045. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1513854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S., Füchslin, T., Metag, J., Kristiansen, S., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2018). The different audiences of science communication: A segmentation analysis of the Swiss population’s perceptions of science and their information and media use patterns. Public Understanding of Science. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1177/0963662517752886
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. (2018). Beyond the choir? The Need to Understand Multiple Publics for Science. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1123–1126. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1521543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., Corley, E. A., Shih, T. J., Dalrymple, K. E., & Ho, S. S. (2009). Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nature Nanotechnology, 4(2), 91–94. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (1996). Theory and method in health audience segmentation. Journal of Health Communication, 1(3), 267–284. doi: 10.1080/108107396128059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sütterlin, B., Brunner, T. A., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Who puts the most energy into energy conservation? A segmentation of energy consumers based on energy-related behavioral characteristics. Energy Policy, 39(12), 8137–8152. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K., & Geiger, N. (2017). From alarmed to dismissive of climate change: A single item assessment of individual differences in concern and issue involvement. Environmental Communication, 11(4), 568–586. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2017.1308409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, P., & Reis, E. (2007). Segmenting households according to recycling attitudes in a Portuguese urban area. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind, Y. (1978). Issues and advances in segmentation research. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(3), 317–337. doi: 10.2307/3150580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yankelovich, D., & Meer, D. (2006). Rediscovering market segmentation. Harvard Business Review, 84(2), 122–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar