711
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Positive Affective Framing of Information Reduces Risk Perceptions and Increases Acceptance of Recycled Water

& ORCID Icon
Pages 391-402 | Received 03 Oct 2018, Accepted 10 Jul 2019, Published online: 22 Nov 2019

References

  • Apostolidis, N., Hertle, C., & Young, R. (2011). Water recycling in Australia. Water, 3, 869–881. doi: 10.3390/w3030869
  • Callaghan, P., Moloney, G., & Blair, D. (2012). Contagion in the representational field of water recycling: Informing new environment practice through social representation theory. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 22(1), 20–37. doi: 10.1002/casp.1101
  • Ching, L. (2010). Eliminating ‘yuck’: A simple exposition of media and social change in water reuse policies. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 26(1), 111–124. doi: 10.1080/07900620903392174
  • Conner, M., & Sparks, P. (2002). Ambivalence and attitudes. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 37–70.
  • Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and Persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345–374. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034
  • Dolnicar, S., Hurlimann, A., & Nghiem, L. D. (2010). The effect of information on public acceptance - The case of water from alternative sources. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1288–1293. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.003
  • Fielding, K. S., Dolnicar, S., & Schultz, T. (2018). Public acceptance of recycled water. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35, 551–586. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2017.1419125
  • Fielding, K. S., & Roiko, A. H. (2014). Providing information promotes greater public support for potable recycled water. Water Research, 61, 86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.002
  • Gibson, F. L., & Burton, M. (2014). Salt or sludge? Exploring preferences for potable water sources. Environmental and Resource Economics, 57(3), 453–476. doi: 10.1007/s10640-013-9672-9
  • Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2006). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion Regulation (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
  • Hurlimann, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2010). When public opposition defeats alternative water projects - The case of Toowoomba Australia. Water Research, 44(1), 287–297. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.020
  • Hurlimann, A., Hemphill, E., McKay, J., & Geursen, G. (2008). Establishing components of community satisfaction with recycled water use through a structural equation model. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 1221–1232.
  • Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Analysis, 26(2), 631–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00773.x
  • Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286.
  • Menegaki, A. N., Mellon, R. C., Vrentzou, A., Koumakis, G., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2009). What’s in a name: Framing treated wastewater as recycled water increases willingness to use and willingness to pay. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 285–292.
  • Nancarrow, B. E., Leviston, Z., Po, M., Porter, N. B., & Tucker, D. I. (2008). What drives communities’ decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 57(4), 485–491.
  • Nancarrow, B. E., Leviston, Z., & Tucker, D. I. (2009). Measuring the predictors of communities’ behavioural decisions for potable reuse of wastewater. Water, Science & Technology, 60(12), 3199–3209. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.759
  • Po, M., Kaercher, J. D., & Nancarrow, B. E. (2003). Literature review of factors influencing public perceptions of water reuse (Technical Report 54/03). Canberra: CSIRO Land and Water.
  • Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2005). Trust in risk regulation: Cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? Risk Analysis, 25(1), 199–209.
  • Price, J., Fielding, K., & Leviston, Z. (2012). Supporters and opponents of potable recycled water: Culture and cognition in the Toowoomba referendum. Society and Natural Resources, 25, 980–995.
  • Price, J., Fielding, K. S., Gardner, J., Leviston, Z., & Green, M. (2015). Developing effective messages about potable recycled water: The importance of message structure and content. Water Resources Research, 51, 2174–2187. doi: 10.1002/2014WR016514
  • Ross, V. L., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: Testing a social-psychological model. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 61–68.
  • Rozin, P., Haddad, B., Nemeroff, C., & Slovic, P. (2015). Psychological aspects of the rejection of recycled water: Contamination, purification and disgust. Judgement and Decision Making, 10(1), 50–63.
  • Russell, S., & Lux, C. (2009). Getting over yuck: Moving from psychological to cultural and sociotechnical analyses of responses to water recycling. Water Policy, 11(1), 21–35. doi: 10.2166/wp.2009.007
  • Schmidt, C. W. (2009). The yuck factor: When disgust meets discovery. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(2), A524–A527.
  • Schultz, T., & Fielding, K. (2014). The common in-group identity model enhances communication about recycled water. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 296–305.
  • Schütz, H., & Wiedemann, P. M. (2008). Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 369–379.
  • Simpson, J., & Stratton, H. (2011). Talking about water: Words and images that enhance understanding (Waterlines Report). Canberra: National Water Commission.
  • Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 689–701. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00439.x
  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322.
  • Slovic, P., Peters, E., Finucane, M. L., & MacGregor, D. G. (2005). Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology, 24(4), S35–S40.
  • Townsend, E., & Campbell, S. (2004). Psychological determinants of willingness to taste and purchase genetically modified food. Risk Analysis, 25(5), 1385–1393. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00533.x
  • Uhlmann, V., & Head, B. W. (2011). Water recycling: Recent history of local government initiatives in South East Queensland. Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report No. 45. Brisbane: Urban Water Security Research Alliance.
  • United Nations Environment Programme. (2008). Vital water graphics: An overview of the world's fresh and marine waters (2nd ed.). Nairobi: Author.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
  • World Bank. (2010). Water and development: An evaluation of World Bank Support, 1997-2007. Washington, DC: Author.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.