Using Eco-Guilt to Motivate Environmental Behavior Change

References

• Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., Turk, C. L., Shaw, L. L., & Klein, T. R. (1995). Information function of empathic emotion: Learning that we value the other’s welfare. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 300–313. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumberg, F. C., Almonte, D. E., Barkhardori, Y., & Leno, A. (2014). Academic lessons from video game learning. In F. C. Blumberg (Ed.), Learning by playing: Video gaming in education (pp. 3–11). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brügger, A., Morton, T. A., & Dessai, S. (2015). Hand in hand: Public endorsement of climate change mitigation and adaptation. PloS one, 10(4), e0124843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D’ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The basic empathy scale in adults (BES-A): factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 679–691. doi: 10.1037/a0032297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czap, N. V., & Czap, H. J. (2010). An experimental investigation of revealed environmental concern. Ecological Economics, 69, 2033–2041. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahab, D. J., Gentry, J. W., & Su, W. (1995). New ways to reach non-recyclers: An extension of the model of reasoned action to recycling behaviors. ACR North American Advances, 22, 251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimenional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Environmental behavior: Discrepancies between aspirations and reality. Rationality and Society, 10(1), 79–102. doi: 10.1177/104346398010001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24, 56–62. doi: 10.1177/0956797612449177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L., & Hart, P. S. (2018). Is there any hope? How climate change news imagery and text influence audience emotions and support for climate mitigation policies. Risk Analysis, 38, 585–602. doi: 10.1111/risa.12868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup. (2018). Party affiliation. Retrieved from http://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Gillath, O., McCall, C., Shaver, P. R., & Blascovich, J. (2008). What can virtual reality teach us about prosocial tendencies in real and virtual environments? Media Psychology, 11, 259–282. doi: 10.1080/15213260801906489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, M., & Melzer, A. (2012). Macbeth and the joystick: Evidence for moral cleansing after playing a violent video game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1356–1360. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizzard, M., Tamborini, R., Lewis, R. J., Wang, L., & Prabhu, S. (2014). Being bad in a video game can make us morally sensitive. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 499–504. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizzard, M., Tamborini, R., Sherry, J. L., & Weber, R. (2017). Repeated play reduces video games’ ability to elicit guilt: Evidence from a longitudinal experiment. Media Psychology, 20, 267–290. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2016.1142382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699–718. doi: 10.1177/0013916595275005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C., & Saito, K. (2015). A four-party view of US environmental concern. Environmental Politics, 24(2), 212–227. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2014.976485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harth, N. S., Leach, C. W., & Kessler, T. (2013). Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour: Different emotions predict distinct intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh, J. B. (2010). Personality and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 245–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kees, J., Berry, C., Burton, S., & Sheehan, K. (2017). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 141–155. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Kim, M., Kim, S., & Choi, J. (2014). Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2097–2105. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallett, R. K. (2012). Eco-guilt motivates eco-friendly behavior. Ecopsychology, 4(3), 223–231. doi: 10.1089/eco.2012.0031
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, I., Bekebrede, G., Harteveld, C., Warmelink, H., Zhou, Q., van Ruijven, T., … Wenzler, I. (2014). The research and evaluation of serious games: Toward a comprehensive methodology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 502–527. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x
   Google Scholar
• Rees, J. H., Klug, S., & Bamberg, S. (2015). Guilty conscience: Motivating pro-environmental behavior by inducing negative moral emotions. Climatic Change, 130, 439–452. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1278-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. (2000). New environmental theories: Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391–406. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1998). Values and proenvironmental behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 540–558. doi: 10.1177/0022022198294003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seelig, M. I. (2019). Popularizing the environment in modern media. The Communication Review, 22(1), 45–83. doi: 10.1080/10714421.2019.1569449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K. R., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Video games and the future of learning. Phi delta kappan, 87(2), 105–111. doi: 10.1177/003172170508700205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27, 723–743. doi: 10.1177/0013916595276001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange Loop Games. (2015). Eco. (Version Beta) [Computer software]. Seattle, WA: Strange Loop Games.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrant, M. A., & Green, G. T. (1999). Outdoor recreation and the predictive validity of environmental attitudes. Leisure Sciences, 21(1), 17–30. doi: 10.1080/014904099273264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiefenbeck, V., Staake, T., Roth, K., & Sachs, O. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy, 57, 160–171. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, A. J., & Lewis, N. (2012). Mirrored morality: An exploration of moral choice in video games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 610–614. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitburn, J., Linklater, W. L., & Milfont, T. L. (2018). Exposure to urban nature and tree planting are related to pro-environmental behavior via connection to nature, the use of nature for psychological restoration, and environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 51, 787–810. doi: 10.1177/0013916517751009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Seo, M., Rickard, L. N., & Harrison, T. M. (2015). Information sufficiency and attribution of responsibility: Predicting support for climate change policy and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Risk Research, 18, 727–746. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2014.910692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar